Wei-Hsiang Hung | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Separating ClonableQMA and QCMA Relative to a Classical Oracle

Since the introduction of the complexity class QMA as a quantum-verifier analogue of NP (Kitaev, 1997), many have wondered whether quantum proofs are necessary or classical proofs suffice - that is, whether QMA = QCMA or QCMA != QMA (Aharonov and Naveh, 2002; Aaronson and Kuperberg, CCC '07). This longstanding question was recently answered by works of Bostanci, Haferkamp, Nirkhe, and Zhandry (STOC '26) and Bostanci, Huang, and Vaikuntanathan (FOCS '26), which showed that quantum proofs are more powerful than classical ones in the classical-oracle setting. However, it remains unclear what exactly makes quantum proofs more powerful than classical ones. In the information-theoretic setting, a family of quantum states is not classicalizable if and only if it is unclonable. Indeed, these recent works also explicitly highlight the unclonability of their quantum proofs as a key mechanism behind their separations, and their arguments crucially rely on this property. This raises the question of whether unclonability is necessary for quantum proofs to be more powerful than classical ones. In this work, we show that even clonable quantum proofs can be more powerful than classical ones relative to a classical oracle by constructing a classical oracle O such that QCMA^O != ClonableQMA^O. This resolves the open question of Nehoran and Zhandry (ITCS '24), who established the analogous separation relative to a quantum oracle. We also show a classical-oracle separation between BQP/clonableqpoly and BQP/poly, and give applications of our results to quantum cryptography.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

Constant-Rate Certified Deletion

We present a unified framework for upgrading a broad class of cryptographic primitives to support constant-rate certified deletion. Previous constructions require a linear number of qubits per encrypted bit of certified-deletable plaintext. In contrast, we obtain the first constant-rate constructions in the plain model that achieve certified deletion while preserving everlasting security. Our approach applies to a wide range of "all-or-nothing"-type primitives based on BB84-style encodings, including commitment schemes, public-key encryption, attribute-based encryption, and fully homomorphic encryption. Beyond this class, we also obtain constant-rate certified deletion for primitives built from subspace coset states, such as blind delegation, secure software leasing, functional encryption, and differing-inputs iO, and CCA-PKE. Importantly, our framework does not introduce any additional assumptions beyond those required by the underlying certified deletion primitives. Finally, under the hardness of SIS, we show that public verifiability can be incorporated into BB84- and coset-based certified deletion. In combination with our constant-rate constructions, this yields publicly verifiable certified deletion schemes with constant rate.

cs.CR↗