SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Weitao An

Publications and source records attributed to Weitao An.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Semantic Evidence Regulation via Relational Bias for Zero-Shot Object Navigation

Object navigation requires an embodied agent to locate a target object in an unknown environment through visual observations. Existing zero-shot methods typically leverage open-vocabulary perception and semantic priors to identify promising search regions. However, these methods often assume that semantic cues provide reliable guidance, while lacking mechanisms to assess and adjust their influence during exploration. Consequently, misleading semantic evidence can persist throughout navigation, biasing frontier selection and causing agents to repeatedly explore unreliable regions. To address this problem, we propose SER-Nav, a training-free framework that achieves dynamic Semantic Evidence Regulation via relational bias. SER-Nav introduces dual relational biases: activation reinforces target-related and contextual evidence to guide exploration, while inhibition attenuates misleading evidence caused by perceptual confusion and failed verification. These relational biases dynamically update the navigation search space, and a reliability-aware commitment gate prevents premature pursuit of insufficiently verified targets. By adaptively adjusting the influence of semantic cues, SER-Nav preserves useful guidance while mitigating persistent semantic misguidance under noisy open-vocabulary perception. Experiments on standard ObjectNav benchmarks demonstrate that SER-Nav consistently improves success rate and path efficiency over representative zero-shot methods. Extensive ablation studies further validate the effectiveness of each component. Real-world robot experiments further validate its robustness and practical applicability.

cs.RO

DSCD-Nav: Dual-Stance Cooperative Debate for Object Navigation

Adaptive navigation in unfamiliar indoor environments is crucial for household service robots. Despite advances in zero-shot perception and reasoning from vision-language models, existing navigation systems still rely on single-pass scoring at the decision layer, leading to overconfident long-horizon errors and redundant exploration. To tackle these problems, we propose Dual-Stance Cooperative Debate Navigation (DSCD-Nav), a decision mechanism that replaces one-shot scoring with stance-based cross-checking and evidence-aware arbitration to improve action reliability under partial observability. Specifically, given the same observation and candidate action set, we explicitly construct two stances by conditioning the evaluation on diverse and complementary objectives: a Task-Scene Understanding (TSU) stance that prioritizes goal progress from scene-layout cues, and a Safety-Information Balancing (SIB) stance that emphasizes risk and information value. The stances conduct a cooperative debate and make policy by cross-checking their top candidates with cue-grounded arguments. Then, a Navigation Consensus Arbitration (NCA) agent is employed to consolidate both sides' reasons and evidence, optionally triggering lightweight micro-probing to verify uncertain choices, preserving NCA's primary intent while disambiguating. Experiments on HM3Dv1, HM3Dv2, and MP3D demonstrate consistent improvements in success and path efficiency while reducing exploration redundancy.

cs.RO