arXiv subjects

Wells Lucas Santo

Publications and source records attributed to Wells Lucas Santo.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Position: AI/ML Deepfake Research is Misaligned with AI-Generated Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery (AIG-NCII)

AI-generated non-consensual intimate imagery (AIG-NCII) is not adequately addressed in AI/ML literature regarding AI-generated media, commonly referred to as "deepfakes". While research on deepfakes currently focuses on its epistemic harms -- or harms relating to truth and authenticity -- this is misaligned with the dominant reality of generative AI abuse involving sexualized imagery. We conduct a landscape analysis of highly-cited works to demonstrate that technical interventions addressing deepfakes almost entirely ignore AIG-NCII, limiting the research ecosystem to authenticity detection tools. In this position paper, we argue that existing interventions address viewer-centric epistemic harms, such as fraud or scams, but ignore subject-centric dignity harms, such as AIG-NCII. We illustrate that knowing an image is synthetic does not mitigate harms to subjects and may, in some cases, even exacerbate them. We conclude by offering recommendations to realign the field, including updating threat models to consider subject-centric harms and addressing AIG-NCII in AI safety research. Finally, we caution that researchers should only engage in this high-risk domain if they implement safety guardrails for both subjects and researchers and establish partnerships with domain experts in sexual violence prevention.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

To Police or to Guide: How Higher Education Computer Science Instructors Design and Implement Generative AI Policies

While generative AI tools are directly changing how undergraduate computer science is learned and taught, they are also reshaping the relationships between instructors and students. In contrast to existing tool-oriented research on how instructors view and adopt AI, this study investigates how instructors think about their roles and responsibilities to students through their course AI policies. Based on 13 semi-structured interviews with CS instructors in the US, we found that while instructors recognize that AI tools could harm student learning, AI policies primarily seek to AI-proof assessments without directly addressing student learning. Although policies such as switching to paper exams can preserve assessment integrity in the short term, instructors report extra burden of policing student AI use behaviors and worsening relationships with students. Based on the experiences of several interviewees, we make recommendations on AI policies that are more learning-oriented and could guide students toward healthier AI usage instead.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

Resisting AI Solutionism through Workplace Collective Action

In the face of increasing austerity and threats of AI-enabled labor replacement at the University of Michigan, a group of workers and students have coalesced around the project of "AI resistance" since Fall 2024. Forming a cross-departmental coalition including librarians, faculty, staff, graduate workers, and undergraduate students, we have hosted a public workshop questioning the techno-deterministic inevitability of AI use at the University and are working with other campus organizations to maintain an ongoing organizing space. This workshop submission incorporates our reflections thus far on the strategies we've employed, the challenges to collective resistance, and our role as workers in resisting AI within the University. Our aim for this work is to provide concrete inspiration for technologists, students, and staff looking to resist AI techno-solutionism within their own universities.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2024

Facing Identity: The Formation and Performance of Identity via Face-Based Artificial Intelligence Technologies

How is identity constructed and performed in the digital via face-based artificial intelligence technologies? While questions of identity on the textual Internet have been thoroughly explored, the Internet has progressed to a multimedia form that not only centers the visual, but specifically the face. At the same time, a wealth of scholarship has and continues to center the topics of surveillance and control through facial recognition technologies (FRTs), which have extended the logics of the racist pseudoscience of physiognomy. Much less work has been devoted to understanding how such face-based artificial intelligence technologies have influenced the formation and performance of identity. This literature review considers how such technologies interact with faciality, which entails the construction of what a face may represent or signify, along axes of identity such as race, gender, and sexuality. In grappling with recent advances in AI such as image generation and deepfakes, I propose that we are now in an era of "post-facial" technologies that build off our existing culture of facility while eschewing the analog face, complicating our relationship with identity vis-a-vis the face. Drawing from previous frameworks of identity play in the digital, as well as trans practices that have historically played with or transgressed the boundaries of identity classification, we can develop concepts adequate for analyzing digital faciality and identity given the current landscape of post-facial artificial intelligence technologies that allow users to interface with the digital in an entirely novel manner. To ground this framework of transgression, I conclude by proposing an interview study with VTubers -- online streamers who perform using motion-captured avatars instead of their real-life faces -- to gain qualitative insight on how these sociotechnical experiences.

cs.CY↗