SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Werner Sommer

Publications and source records attributed to Werner Sommer.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Beyond variance: sensitivity-based dimensions in brain networks underlie individual differences in cognitive ability

Explaining individual differences in cognitive abilities requires both identifying brain parameters that vary across individuals and understanding how brain networks are recruited for specific tasks. Typically, task performance relies on the integration and segregation of functional subnetworks, often captured by parameters like regional excitability and connectivity. Yet, the high dimensionality of these parameters hinders pinpointing their functional relevance. Here, we apply stiff-sloppy analysis to human brain data, revealing that certain subtle parameter combinations ("stiff dimensions") powerfully influence neural activity during task processing, whereas others ("sloppy dimensions") vary more extensively but exert minimal impact. Using a pairwise maximum entropy model of task fMRI, we show that even small deviations in stiff dimensions-derived through Fisher Information Matrix analysis-govern the dynamic interplay of segregation and integration between the default mode network (DMN) and a working memory network (WMN). Crucially, separating a 0-back task (vigilant attention) from a 2-back task (working memory updating) uncovers partially distinct stiff dimensions predicting performance in each condition, along with a global DMN-WMN segregation shared across both tasks. Altogether, stiff-sloppy analysis challenges the conventional focus on large parameter variability by highlighting these subtle yet functionally decisive parameter combinations.

q-bio.NC

What do neuroanatomical networks reveal about the ontology of human cognitive abilities?

Over the last decades, cognitive psychology has come to fair consensus about the ontological structure of human intelligence. However, it remains an open question, whether anatomical properties of the brain support the same ontology. The present study explored the ontological structure derived from neuroanatomical networks associated with performance in 15 cognitive tasks indicating various abilities. Results suggest that the brain-derived (neurometric) ontology is partly consistent with the cognitive performance-derived (psychometric) ontology. However, there are interpretable and complementary differences as well. Moreover, the cortical areas associated with different inferred abilities are segregated, with little or no overlap. Nevertheless, these spatially segregated cortical areas are integrated via denser white matter structural connections as compared with the general brain connectome. The integration of ability-related cortical networks constitutes a neural counterpart to the psychometric construct of general intelligence, while the consistency and differences between psychometric and neurometric ontologies represent crucial pieces of knowledge for theory building, clinical diagnostics and treatment.

q-bio.NC