SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

William Bassichis

Publications and source records attributed to William Bassichis.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Click, Watch, Learn: The Impact of Student Self-Study Materials on Physics E&M Course Outcomes

Performance in introductory courses, particularly physics, is often crucial for student success in STEM majors and can impact an individual's tendency to persist in their chosen field. To enhance students' individual learning experiences, faculty at many universities have worked to develop open-access, self-study materials to help build conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills. Faculty at Texas A&M University have contributed to these efforts, creating more than 200 online video resources and a broad bank of prior exams available to students. This work explores and measures the impact that these resources can have on student course outcomes in an introductory, calculus-based electricity and magnetism course. Data were collected from three fall semesters, 2021-2023, including classroom performance, a conceptual assessment, and relevant university level data to contextualize student background and pre-class abilities. Similar to prior studies, we found that relevant prior preparation in mathematics was the strongest predictor of student performance, with prior physics knowledge being a weaker but still statistically significant predictor. Students' utilization of supplemental old exams was the second highest predictor of student performance. First generation students were observed to have a slightly lower average performance on exams. However, interaction terms in the regression models indicated that first generation students using supplemental old exams were able to close this gap. Through anonymous surveys, students reported warm impressions of the materials, with over 80 per cent of students sharing that they had a noticeable contribution to their learning outside of the classroom and 98 per cent stating they would recommend them to their peers.

physics.ed-ph

Gendered Performance Differences in Introductory Physics: A Study from a Large Land-Grant University

Studies examining gender differences in introductory physics show a consensus when it comes to a gender gap on conceptual assessments; however, the story is not as clear when it comes to differences in gendered performance on exams. This study examined whether gendered differences exist on midterm and final exams in introductory physics courses and if such differences were correlated with a gender difference in final course grades. The population for this study included more than 10,000 students enrolled in algebra- and calculus-based introductory physics courses between spring 2007 and spring 2019. We found a small but statistically significant difference, with a weak effect size, in final letter grades for only one out of four courses: algebra-based mechanics. By looking at midterm exam grades, statistically significant differences were noted for some exams in three out of four courses, with algebra-based electricity and magnetism being the exception. In all statistically significant cases, the effect size was small or weak, indicating that performance on exams and final letter grades was not strongly dependent on gender. As an added dimension examining gendered differences, we investigated if differences exist when accounting for instructor gender. Additionally, a questionnaire was administered in fall 2019 to more than 1,600 students in both introductory sequences to explore students' perceptions of performance, class contributions, and inclusion. We observed some differences between students' perception of their performance and contribution when grouped by gender, but no difference on perception of inclusion.

physics.ed-ph