arXiv subjects

Wing-Keung Wong

Publications and source records attributed to Wing-Keung Wong.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Clustering based on Stochastic Dominance with application for risk averters and risk seekers

Stochastic Dominance (SD) theory provides a rigorous framework for selecting superior assets tailored to the asset allocation needs of investors with varying risk preferences (i.e., risk-averse, risk-seeking, and risk-neutral). However, traditional stock clustering methods typically rely on geometric metrics such as Euclidean distance, which often fail to effectively capture the intrinsic risk dominance relationships among assets. To address this limitation, this paper proposes an innovative clustering analysis framework based on SD test statistics. Methodologically, this study deeply integrates SD theory with machine learning algorithms. Transcending the limitations of traditional reliance on geometric distance, we innovatively utilize test statistics from first-, second-, and third-order SD to construct a "Stochastic Dominance Coefficient Matrix." Building upon this matrix, we modify the classic K-means and Hierarchical Clustering algorithms. Specifically, we derive 12 distinct algorithm variants tailored to different orders of SD relationships. Simultaneously, we construct the SD-SC coefficient and the SD-DBI index as specialized validity indices to evaluate the clustering performance. Empirically, we analyze constituent stock data from a representative developed market (the US NASDAQ Index) and an emerging market (China's CSI 100 Index). The results verify the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed method. Furthermore, we apply the clustering results to the modification of the Single Index Model and the construction of Global Minimum Variance Portfolios (GMVP). The findings demonstrate that the proposed method effectively facilitates customized asset allocation for investors, holding significant theoretical value and practical implications.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2017

A New Test of Multivariate Nonlinear Causality

The multivariate nonlinear Granger causality developed by Bai et al. (2010) plays an important role in detecting the dynamic interrelationships between two groups of variables. Following the idea of Hiemstra-Jones (HJ) test proposed by Hiemstra and Jones (1994), they attempt to establish a central limit theorem (CLT) of their test statistic by applying the asymptotical property of multivariate $U$-statistic. However, Bai et al. (2016) revisit the HJ test and find that the test statistic given by HJ is NOT a function of $U$-statistics which implies that the CLT neither proposed by Hiemstra and Jones (1994) nor the one extended by Bai et al. (2010) is valid for statistical inference. In this paper, we re-estimate the probabilities and reestablish the CLT of the new test statistic. Numerical simulation shows that our new estimates are consistent and our new test performs decent size and power.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2017

The Hiemstra-Jones Test Revisited

The famous Hiemstra-Jones (HJ) test developed by Hiemstra and Jones (1994) plays a significant role in studying nonlinear causality. Over the last two decades, there have been numerous applications and theoretical extensions based on this pioneering work. However, several works note that counterintuitive results are obtained from the HJ test, and some researchers find that the HJ test is seriously over-rejecting in simulation studies. In this paper, we reinvestigate HJ's creative 1994 work and find that their proposed estimators of the probabilities over different time intervals were not consistent with the target ones proposed in their criterion. To test HJ's novel hypothesis on Granger causality, we propose new estimators of the probabilities defined in their paper and reestablish the asymptotic properties to induce new tests similar to those of HJ. Some simulations will also be presented to support our findings.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2010

Revisiting Gruss's inequality: covariance bounds,QDE but not QD copulas, and central moments

Since the pioneering work of Gerhard Gruss dating back to 1935, Gruss's inequality and, more generally, Gruss-type bounds for covariances have fascinated researchers and found numerous applications in areas such as economics, insurance, reliability, and, more generally, decision making under uncertainly. Gruss-type bounds for covariances have been established mainly under most general dependence structures, meaning no restrictions on the dependence structure between the two underlying random variables. Recent work in the area has revealed a potential for improving Gruss-type bounds, including the original Gruss's bound, assuming dependence structures such as quadrant dependence (QD). In this paper we demonstrate that the relatively little explored notion of `quadrant dependence in expectation' (QDE) is ideally suited in the context of bounding covariances, especially those that appear in the aforementioned areas of application. We explore this research avenue in detail, establish general Gruss-type bounds, and illustrate them with newly constructed examples of bivariate distributions, which are not QD but, nevertheless, are QDE. The examples rely on specially devised copulas. We supplement the examples with results concerning general copulas and their convex combinations. In the process of deriving Gruss-type bounds, we also establish new bounds for central moments, whose optimality is demonstrated.

math.PR↗