arXiv subjects

Wolfgang Huber

Publications and source records attributed to Wolfgang Huber.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

The Challenge of Cell Segmentation in Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics

Spatially resolved transcriptomics (SRT) is transforming how we study tissues by measuring gene expression in cells in their spatial context. However, the field lacks robust methodological guidance on one of its most fundamental analytical steps: how to accurately segment cells and assign spatially localized transcripts to them. Major technical challenges include sparse molecular signals, transcript displacement, complex cellular morphologies, and the projection of three-dimensional tissue architecture onto two-dimensional imaging planes. These challenges make segmentation a major source of uncertainty, with errors that can propagate through downstream analyses and ultimately lead to misleading biological interpretations. Here, we argue that segmentation should be treated as a central unresolved problem in spatial omics rather than a routine preprocessing step. We review current approaches, highlight key methodological limitations, including the lack of appropriate metrics and gold-standard benchmarks, and propose a community-driven path forward. Establishing shared evaluation frameworks, scalable benchmark datasets, and transparent reporting standards will be essential for transforming SRT into a robust and reproducible foundation for biological discovery and clinical translation.

q-bio.OT↗

arXiv2021

Covariate powered cross-weighted multiple testing

A fundamental task in the analysis of datasets with many variables is screening for associations. This can be cast as a multiple testing task, where the objective is achieving high detection power while controlling type I error. We consider $m$ hypothesis tests represented by pairs $((P_i, X_i))_{1\leq i \leq m}$ of p-values $P_i$ and covariates $X_i$, such that $P_i \perp X_i$ if $H_i$ is null. Here, we show how to use information potentially available in the covariates about heterogeneities among hypotheses to increase power compared to conventional procedures that only use the $P_i$. To this end, we upgrade existing weighted multiple testing procedures through the Independent Hypothesis Weighting (IHW) framework to use data-driven weights that are calculated as a function of the covariates. Finite sample guarantees, e.g., false discovery rate (FDR) control, are derived from cross-weighting, a data-splitting approach that enables learning the weight-covariate function without overfitting as long as the hypotheses can be partitioned into independent folds, with arbitrary within-fold dependence. IHW has increased power compared to methods that do not use covariate information. A key implication of IHW is that hypothesis rejection in common multiple testing setups should not proceed according to the ranking of the p-values, but by an alternative ranking implied by the covariate-weighted p-values.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

The importance of transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence research

In their study, McKinney et al. showed the high potential of artificial intelligence for breast cancer screening. However, the lack of detailed methods and computer code undermines its scientific value. We identify obstacles hindering transparent and reproducible AI research as faced by McKinney et al and provide solutions with implications for the broader field.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2018

Adaptive penalization in high-dimensional regression and classification with external covariates using variational Bayes

Penalization schemes like Lasso or ridge regression are routinely used to regress a response of interest on a high-dimensional set of potential predictors. Despite being decisive, the question of the relative strength of penalization is often glossed over and only implicitly determined by the scale of individual predictors. At the same time, additional information on the predictors is available in many applications but left unused. Here, we propose to make use of such external covariates to adapt the penalization in a data-driven manner. We present a method that differentially penalizes feature groups defined by the covariates and adapts the relative strength of penalization to the information content of each group. Using techniques from the Bayesian tool-set our procedure combines shrinkage with feature selection and provides a scalable optimization scheme. We demonstrate in simulations that the method accurately recovers the true effect sizes and sparsity patterns per feature group. Furthermore, it leads to an improved prediction performance in situations where the groups have strong differences in dynamic range. In applications to data from high-throughput biology, the method enables re-weighting the importance of feature groups from different assays. Overall, using available covariates extends the range of applications of penalized regression, improves model interpretability and can improve prediction performance. We provide an open-source implementation of the method in the R package graper.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2013

Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor

RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has been rapidly adopted for the profiling of transcriptomes in many areas of biology, including studies into gene regulation, development and disease. Of particular interest is the discovery of differentially expressed genes across different conditions (e.g., tissues, perturbations), while optionally adjusting for other systematic factors that affect the data collection process. There are a number of subtle yet critical aspects of these analyses, such as read counting, appropriate treatment of biological variability, quality control checks and appropriate setup of statistical modeling. Several variations have been presented in the literature, and there is a need for guidance on current best practices. This protocol presents a "state-of-the-art" computational and statistical RNA-seq differential expression analysis workflow largely based on the free open-source R language and Bioconductor software and in particular, two widely-used tools DESeq and edgeR. Hands-on time for typical small experiments (e.g., 4-10 samples) can be <1 hour, with computation time <1 day using a standard desktop PC.

q-bio.GN↗