arXiv subjects

Xiao Jia

Publications and source records attributed to Xiao Jia.

15 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

CGSM: Concept-Guided Segmentation Model for Precise Pulmonary Lesion Delineation

Accurate segmentation of pulmonary lesions is essential for effective clinical diagnosis and treatment strategies. Existing segmentation approaches often lack task-specific semantic guidance, as text-based annotations typically offer coarse localization of lesions, leading to inadequate delineation of lesion boundaries and poor performance on small-scale lesions. To address this, we propose CGSM, a Concept-Guided Segmentation Model that integrates LLM-generated and clinically reviewed concepts into the segmentation process. Specifically, we design a Concept-Visual Alignment Module (CVAM) to activate relevant tokens within the concepts that align with visual features, enhancing the interaction between textual and visual information. In addition, we introduce a Concept Modulated Decoder (CM-Decoder), which uses concepts from CVAM as modulation signals to facilitate the adaptive fusion of image and text features, improving the segmentation accuracy. Extensive experiments on two public datasets show that CGSM achieves state-of-the-art performance, with results of 91.59% Dice and 84.49% mIoU on the QaTa-COV19 dataset, demonstrating its effectiveness in pulmonary lesion segmentation.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Mapping the Emerging Social Science of Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly shape communication, learning, work, creativity, and decision-making, yet social-science research on these developments remains fragmented. We map this emerging field using a curated corpus of 198 papers reviewed in full and a field-scale corpus of 47,719 published papers from five bibliographic databases. Combining sentence embeddings, K-means clustering, within-cluster Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), author and LLM classifications, and structural topic modeling, we identify three domains: LLM as Social Minds, examining socially interpretable model behavior; LLM Societies, examining collective dynamics among interacting model-based agents; and LLM-Human Interactions, examining how people perceive, use, and are affected by LLMs. These domains contain 13 subcategories spanning reasoning, personality and bias, behavioral games, collective intelligence, simulation, trust, work, creativity, and education. In the curated corpus, the three-domain solution is highly stable under resampling (adjusted Rand index = 0.952), and K-means assignments agree with author full-text classifications for 77.78% of papers. At field scale, 13 of 15 topics map onto the taxonomy, while K-means and structural-topic-model domains agree for 73.83% of overlapping papers. LLM-Human Interactions accounts for 78.02% of domain-mapped topic mass, but venue analysis reveals a contrasting pattern: Social Minds and LLM Societies together account for 66.37% of highly cited papers in leading conference venues, whereas LLM-Human Interactions accounts for 76.81% in the corresponding journal subset. The resulting taxonomy provides a reproducible framework for understanding how model behavior, agent interaction, and institutional context jointly shape the social consequences of LLMs.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Heterogeneous Neural Predictivity from Language Models During Naturalistic Comprehension

Language-model representations provide structured, high-dimensional annotations of naturalistic language stimuli and can serve as informative neural predictors during comprehension. We analyzed locked derived data from Brain Treebank, MEG-MASC, and Podcast ECoG with eight frozen language models, blocked encoding models, and matched temporal, nuisance, and representation-capacity controls. Positive held-out prediction and gains over low-level baselines were widespread in source-level summaries. Across Brain Treebank and Podcast ECoG, 67 of 432 evaluable rows met a controlled predictive-only criterion, and model-side feature ablations changed prediction scores in most evaluable source rows. Brain-derived, timing-linked, acoustic, and implanted-signal controls confirmed component-level sensitivity of the analysis pipeline. These findings show that language-model-derived quantities can annotate neural activity during natural speech and text comprehension. Participant-level matched-control advantages were localized rather than uniform, response-profile and feature-specificity contrasts bounded representational or computational interpretations, and complete co-indexed integrated interpretation will require future jointly indexed coverage. Together, the analyses identify language-model features as useful neural predictors and separate predictive usefulness from claims about shared neural organization or language-processing computations.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

NeuroState-Bench: A Human-Calibrated Benchmark for Commitment Integrity in LLM Agent Profiles

Outcome-only evaluation under-specifies whether an evaluated agent profile preserves the commitments required to solve a multi-turn task coherently. NeuroState-Bench is a human-calibrated benchmark that operationalizes commitment integrity through benchmark-defined side-query probes rather than inferred hidden activations. The released inventory contains 144 deterministic tasks and 306 benchmark-defined side-query probes spanning eight cognitively motivated failure families, paired clean and distractor variants, and three difficulty bands. The main 32-profile evaluation contains a fixed 16-profile local subset and a matched 16-profile hosted large-model subset evaluated through the same benchmark pipeline. Human calibration uses the final merged reporting scope: 104 sampled task units, 216 raw annotations, and 108 adjudicated task rows, with weighted kappa = 0.977 and ICC(2,1) = 0.977. Empirically, task success and commitment integrity diverge across this expanded grid: the success leader is not the integrity leader, 31 of 32 profiles change rank when integrity replaces task success, and integrity rankings are more stable under distractor perturbation. The primary confidence-free score HCCIS-CORE reaches 0.8469 AUC and 0.6992 PR-AUC for post-probe diagnostic discrimination of terminal task failure; the legacy full heuristic variant HCCIS-FULL reaches 0.7997 AUC and 0.6410 PR-AUC. Probe accuracy and state drift achieve slightly higher ROC-AUC, 0.8587, and better Brier/ECE, while HCCIS-CORE has substantially higher point-estimate PR-AUC and remains more closely tied to the benchmark's intended construct. The exploratory neural-augmented variant HCCIS+N is weaker overall, and a randomized subspace control approaches chance. NeuroState-Bench therefore contributes a calibrated evaluation axis for exposing commitment failures over a broader model grid than the original local-only subset.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Do Language Models Align with Brains? Prediction Scores Are Not Enough

Brain-language model comparisons often interpret neural prediction scores as evidence that model representations capture brain-relevant language computation. We asked whether language models align with brains, and whether prediction scores are enough to support that claim, using L-PACT, a source-audited framework that evaluates predictive, relational, mechanism-stripping, and reliability-bounded evidence. Across primary naturalistic language neural datasets and derived language-model representations, L-PACT compared real model features with nuisance baselines and severe controls, tested whether model-to-brain profiles reproduced brain-to-brain patterns, recomputed held-out scores after mechanism stripping, and normalized evidence against brain-brain ceilings. The locked analysis set contains 414 predictive-control rows, 2304 relational profile rows, 4320 mechanism-stripping rows, 420 brain-brain ceiling rows, and 146 integrated decision rows. Assay-sensitivity checks showed that brain-brain reliability, brain-as-model run-to-run relational profiles, independent low-level neural and WAV-derived acoustic-envelope gates, and a deterministic implanted-signal simulation can produce positive evidence when expected. Nevertheless, no real model row passed the predictive, relational, mechanism-stripping, or operational Turing-bounded reliability gates; all 146 integrated rows were control-explained. Less stringent single-criterion rules would have counted raw positive predictive, relational, stripping-delta, and ceiling-normalized effects, but L-PACT downgraded them because controls explained the apparent evidence. In the analyzed derived artifact set, the tested language-model representations do not satisfy L-PACT alignment gates; apparent positives are converted into an auditable control-explained taxonomy rather than treated as structural alignment.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2026

Causal state binding predicts action control in language agents

Autonomous language agents increasingly expose traces, memories, plans and constraints, but existing evaluations rarely test whether these state variables are bound to final actions. We introduce causal state binding, an intervention-coupled evaluation framework that measures whether actions change with the event-specific decisive state while remaining invariant to irrelevant cues. The primary readout is a hidden-target finite-action benchmark in which scorer-side intervention targets are assigned before generation and withheld from the model-visible prompt. Across 57,816 scored records in seven corpus-level units, structured-agent conditions exceeded high-randomness controls and targeted component removals on reason, memory, veto and self-continuity responsiveness. Open-weight validation across Qwen2.5 7B, 14B and 32B plus Mistral-7B showed that action priors, no-field prompts and scrambled decisive context did not recover the structured-control signature. In diagnostic finite-action probes, the minimal decisive-field readout recovered the prescribed action pattern whereas surface-only, action-prior-only and scrambled-field controls did not. Across 300 SWE-bench Lite issue records and six API models, adding an oracle-free causal state-binding composite to a full non-CSB baseline increased constraint-clean issue-to-file hit@3 AUC from 0.873 to 0.935. This validation concerns issue-to-file localization, not patch application or SWE-bench issue resolution. These results support a measurement principle for agent evaluation: action control is predicted by event-specific state-action binding, not by output entropy, action-prior matching or rationale format alone.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

The Emergence of Social Science of Large Language Models

The social science of large language models (LLMs) examines how these systems evoke mind attributions, interact with one another, and transform human activity and institutions. We conducted a systematic review of 270 studies, combining text embeddings, unsupervised clustering and topic modeling to build a computational taxonomy. Three domains emerge organically across the reviewed literature. LLM as Social Minds examines whether and when models display behaviors that elicit attributions of cognition, morality and bias, while addressing challenges such as test leakage and surface cues. LLM Societies examines multi-agent settings where interaction protocols, architectures and mechanism design shape coordination, norms, institutions and collective epistemic processes. LLM-Human Interactions examines how LLMs reshape tasks, learning, trust, work and governance, and how risks arise at the human-AI interface. This taxonomy provides a reproducible map of a fragmented field, clarifies evidentiary standards across levels of analysis, and highlights opportunities for cumulative progress in the social science of artificial intelligence.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

The Emergence of Altruism in Large-Language-Model Agents Society

Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for social simulation is a frontier in computational social science. Understanding the social logics these agents embody is critical to this attempt. However, existing research has primarily focused on cooperation in small-scale, task-oriented games, overlooking how altruism, which means sacrificing self-interest for collective benefit, emerges in large-scale agent societies. To address this gap, we introduce a Schelling-variant urban migration model that creates a social dilemma, compelling over 200 LLM agents to navigate an explicit conflict between egoistic (personal utility) and altruistic (system utility) goals. Our central finding is a fundamental difference in the social tendencies of LLMs. We identify two distinct archetypes: "Adaptive Egoists", which default to prioritizing self-interest but whose altruistic behaviors significantly increase under the influence of a social norm-setting message board; and "Altruistic Optimizers", which exhibit an inherent altruistic logic, consistently prioritizing collective benefit even at a direct cost to themselves. Furthermore, to qualitatively analyze the cognitive underpinnings of these decisions, we introduce a method inspired by Grounded Theory to systematically code agent reasoning. In summary, this research provides the first evidence of intrinsic heterogeneity in the egoistic and altruistic tendencies of different LLMs. We propose that for social simulation, model selection is not merely a matter of choosing reasoning capability, but of choosing an intrinsic social action logic. While "Adaptive Egoists" may offer a more suitable choice for simulating complex human societies, "Altruistic Optimizers" are better suited for modeling idealized pro-social actors or scenarios where collective welfare is the primary consideration.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2023

The Atiyah class of generalized holomorphic vector bundles

We introduce the notion of Atiyah class of a generalized holomorphic vector bundle, which captures the obstruction to the existence of generalized holomorphic connections on the bundle. As in the classical holomorphic case, this Atiyah class can be defined in three different ways: using Čech cohomology, using the first-jet short exact sequence, or adopting the Lie pair point of view.

math.AG↗

arXiv2019

Machine Learning Techniques for Biomedical Image Segmentation: An Overview of Technical Aspects and Introduction to State-of-Art Applications

In recent years, significant progress has been made in developing more accurate and efficient machine learning algorithms for segmentation of medical and natural images. In this review article, we highlight the imperative role of machine learning algorithms in enabling efficient and accurate segmentation in the field of medical imaging. We specifically focus on several key studies pertaining to the application of machine learning methods to biomedical image segmentation. We review classical machine learning algorithms such as Markov random fields, k-means clustering, random forest, etc. Although such classical learning models are often less accurate compared to the deep learning techniques, they are often more sample efficient and have a less complex structure. We also review different deep learning architectures, such as the artificial neural networks (ANNs), the convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and the recurrent neural networks (RNNs), and present the segmentation results attained by those learning models that were published in the past three years. We highlight the successes and limitations of each machine learning paradigm. In addition, we discuss several challenges related to the training of different machine learning models, and we present some heuristics to address those challenges.

eess.IV↗

arXiv2019

Compact grating coupler using asymmetric waveguide scatterers

We demonstrate a novel grating coupler design based on double asymmetric and vertically oriented waveguide scatterers to efficiently couple normally incident light to a fundamental mode silicon waveguide laying on a buried oxide layer.

physics.optics↗

arXiv2019

Adaptive Guaranteed-Performance Consensus Control for Multiagent Systems With an Adjustable Convergence Speed

Adaptive guaranteed-performance consensus control problems for multi-agent systems are investigated, where the adjustable convergence speed is discussed. This paper firstly proposes a novel adaptive guaranteed-performance consensus protocol, where the communication weights can be adaptively regulated. By the state space decomposition method and the stability theory, sufficient conditions for guaranteed-performance consensus are obtained, as well as the guaranteed-performance cost. Moreover, since the convergence speed is usually adjusted by changing the algebraic connectivity in existing works, which increases the communication burden and the load of the controller, and the system topology is always given in practical applications, the lower bound of the convergence coefficient for multi-agent systems with the adaptive guaranteed-performance consensus protocol is deduced, which is linearly adjustable approximately by changing the adaptive control gain. Finally, simulation examples are introduced to demonstrate theoretical results.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2018

Mono-cross-anisotropic Metasurface Absorbing Boundary Condition (ABC)

We introduce the concept of Metasurface Absorbing-Boundary Condition (MS-ABC). This represents the first application of metasurface technology to computational electromagnetics. MS-ABCs have similar performance as previously reported surface ABCs, but they provide a richer description of absorption, that is independent from the incident wave, and deeper insight into the physics, through bianisotropic susceptibilities. The MS-ABC susceptibilities are synthesized using GSTC synthesis, from which the metasurface is found to be mono-cross-anisotropic, i.e. having only electric-to-magnetic and magnetic-to-electric coupling susceptibility tensors being non-zero, which is physically impossible, but numerically perfectly appropriate. Moreover, it is found that the metasurface is asymmetric, being amplifying in the opposite direction of its basic utilization as an ABC. The MS-ABC is implemented in a GSTC-FDTD scheme, which, for the first time, replaces the virtual grid concept by straightforward surface polarization currents residing on the regular Yee grid.

physics.comp-ph↗

arXiv2018

Nonuniform metasurface analysis in FDTD Based on Susceptibility GSTCs

An accelerated analysis method for non-uniform metasurfaces in FDTD is presented for the first time. The non-uniform metasurfaces are modeled by a distribution of susceptibilities, homogenized parameters. Those susceptibilities are calculated from scattering coefficients of each elements based on Generalized Sheet Transition Conditions (GSTCs). Next, susceptibility modeled metasurface is simulated in 3D FDTD in a form of surface polarization currents. For simplicity, this paper only consider frequencies well below resonance, where the susceptibility is an approximate constant.

physics.comp-ph↗

arXiv2017

Synthesis of Spherical Metasurfaces based on Susceptibility Tensor GSTCs

The bianisotropic susceptibility Generalized Sheet Transition Conditions (GSTCs) synthesis method is extended from planar to spherical metasurfaces. Properties specific to the non-zero intrinsic curvature of the spherical shape are highlighted and different types of corresponding transformations are described. Finally, the susceptibility-GSTC method and exotic properties of spherical metasurfaces are validated and illustrated with three examples: illusion transformation, ring focusing and birefringence.

physics.app-ph↗