Xiaofang Cai | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

People, IT, and Structuration (PIS): An Integrative Theoretical Framework for Management Information Systems

The Management Information Systems (MIS) discipline has long grappled with how to theorize the complex, mutually constitutive relationships among people, information technology, and organizational structures. Decades of research have produced influential but fragmented theoretical streams from socio-technical systems theory to technology acceptance models, from adaptive structuration theory to sociomateriality, and each illuminating important facets while leaving integrative questions unresolved. This paper proposes the People - IT - Structuration (PIS) framework as a unifying theoretical lens that synthesizes these streams. Drawing on Giddens' structuration theory, we conceptualize People (P), Information Technology (I), and Structure (S) not as independent variables but as mutually constitutive elements engaged in ongoing structuration processes. We trace the intellectual history of MIS theorizing to demonstrate how PIS resolves persistent tensions in the field,e.g. between technological and social determinism, between variance and process approaches, and between micro-level interaction and macro-level institutional dynamics. We develop a set of formal propositions articulating the mechanisms through which P, I, and S co-evolve, and extend the framework to address contemporary phenomena including artificial intelligence, algorithmic management, and human-AI collaboration. The PIS framework offers both a retrospective lens for understanding the discipline's theoretical evolution and a prospective tool for guiding research in the AI era.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

League of LLMs: A Benchmark-Free Paradigm for Mutual Evaluation of Large Language Models

Although large language models (LLMs) have shown exceptional capabilities across a wide range of tasks, reliable evaluation remains a critical challenge due to data contamination, opaque operation, and subjective preferences. To address these issues, we propose League of LLMs (LOL), a novel benchmark-free evaluation paradigm that organizes multiple LLMs into a self-governed league for multi-round mutual evaluation. LOL integrates four core criteria (dynamic, transparent, objective, and professional) to mitigate key limitations of existing paradigms. Experiments on eight mainstream LLMs in mathematics and programming demonstrate that LOL can effectively distinguish LLM capabilities while maintaining high internal ranking stability (Top-$k$ consistency $= 70.7\%$). Beyond ranking, LOL reveals empirical findings that are difficult for traditional paradigms to capture. For instance, ``memorization-based answering'' behaviors are observed in some models, and higher in-family scores are found in the OpenAI model family ($Δ= 9$, $p < 0.05$). Finally, we make our framework and code publicly available as a valuable complement to the current LLM evaluation ecosystem.

cs.AI↗