arXiv subjects

Xibin Han

Publications and source records attributed to Xibin Han.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Socially fluent AI decouples conversational signals from source identity in online interaction

Socially fluent agentic AI can now participate in online interaction in ways that resemble ordinary human conversation, potentially weakening people's ability to infer who is human from conversational signals alone. We tested this possibility in synchronous text-based group interaction by embedding undisclosed AI agents as ordinary teammates across analytical, creative, and ethical tasks. Across 786 participants who made 1,572 post-interaction identity judgments, people did not distinguish AI from human teammates above chance. This failure did not arise because the interaction lacked identity-relevant information. Conversational behaviour contained robust cues that differentiated AI from humans and supported highly accurate computational classification. Instead, participants relied on familiar suspicion heuristics, including response speed, fluency, and perceived scriptedness, that were only weakly related to actual identity. Representational analyses further showed that judgments were organised around subjective impressions rather than the behavioural structure encoding ground truth. This dissociation creates new vulnerabilities to coordinated AI agents that can influence and manipulate online discourse at scale.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

From School AI Readiness to Student AI Literacy: A National Multilevel Mediation Analysis of Institutional Capacity and Teacher Capability

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in vocational education systems, yet empirical evidence linking institutional AI readiness to student learning outcomes remains limited. This study develops and tests a 2-2-1 cross-level mediation framework examining how school-level AI readiness is associated with student AI literacy through aggregated teacher mechanisms. Using linked survey data from 1,007 vocational institutions, 156,125 teachers, and 2,379,546 students nationwide, multilevel models were estimated to assess direct, indirect, and contextual effects. Results indicate that overall school AI readiness is positively associated with student AI literacy after adjusting for institutional and regional characteristics. When examined independently, all readiness dimensions show positive associations, while simultaneous modelling suggests that readiness operates as an integrated organisational configuration. Cross-level mediation analyses reveal that aggregated teacher-perceived AI capability partially mediates the relationship between institutional readiness and student literacy, whereas general attitudinal acceptance measures do not demonstrate stable transmission effects. Robustness analyses further show that this readiness-capability-literacy pathway remains structurally stable across heterogeneous regional AI development contexts and under alternative modelling specifications. These findings reposition institutional AI readiness as a multilevel organisational condition linked to student AI literacy, identify collective teacher capability as its central transmission mechanism, and underscore the need to align infrastructural investment with sustained professional capacity development.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

The Social Blindspot in Human-AI Collaboration: How Undetected AI Personas Reshape Team Dynamics

As generative AI systems become increasingly embedded in collaborative work, they are evolving from visible tools into human-like communicative actors that participate socially rather than merely providing information. Yet little is known about how such agents shape team dynamics when their artificial nature is not recognised, a growing concern as human-like AI is deployed at scale in education, organisations, and civic contexts where collaboration underpins collective outcomes. In a large-scale mixed-design experiment (N = 905), we examined how AI teammates with distinct communicative personas, supportive or contrarian, affected collaboration across analytical, creative, and ethical tasks. Participants worked in triads that were fully human or hybrid human-AI teams, without being informed of AI involvement. Results show that participants had limited ability to detect AI teammates, yet AI personas exerted robust social effects. Contrarian personas reduced psychological safety and discussion quality, whereas supportive personas improved discussion quality without affecting safety. These effects persisted after accounting for individual differences in detectability, revealing a dissociation between influence and awareness that we term the social blindspot. Linguistic analyses confirmed that personas were enacted through systematic differences in affective and relational language, with partial mediation for discussion quality but largely direct effects on psychological safety. Together, the findings demonstrate that AI systems can tacitly regulate collaborative norms through persona-level cues, even when users remain unaware of their presence. We argue that persona design constitutes a form of social governance in hybrid teams, with implications for the responsible deployment of AI in collective settings.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Emergent Learner Agency in Implicit Human-AI Collaboration: How Supportive and Contrarian AI Personas Reshape Interaction

As agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems move beyond tool-like support toward more autonomous, team-like roles, a central question concerns the extent to which such systems can meaningfully participate in collaborative learning. Emerging work suggests that agentic AI may adopt distinct interactional personas, such as supportive or contrarian roles, yet little is known about how these personas shape learner agency and group dynamics when AI operates as an undisclosed teammate. This study investigates how supportive and contrarian AI personas influence emergent learner agency, discourse patterns, and experiential outcomes in implicit human-AI creative collaboration. A total of 224 university students were randomly assigned to 97 online triads in human-only, supportive-AI, or contrarian-AI conditions. Teams completed an individual-group-individual creative movie-plot task via a 10-minute text chat. Discourse was coded using a creative-regulatory framework and analysed via transition network analysis, sequential pattern mining, and Gaussian mixture clustering to characterise emergent agency patterns. These patterns were linked to cognitive load, psychological safety, teamwork satisfaction, and creative performance. The findings revealed that contrarian AI produced challenge- and reflection-rich discourse indicative of productive friction, whereas supportive AI promoted agreement-centred trajectories. However, while contrarian personas stimulated critical engagement, they reduced teamwork satisfaction and psychological safety without yielding corresponding gains in creative performance. Educational designs need to balance epistemic challenge with the preservation of the affective climate to ensure that hybrid collaboration supports rather than undermines the learner experience.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Agentic AI as Undercover Teammates: Argumentative Knowledge Construction in Hybrid Human-AI Collaborative Learning

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) agents are increasingly embedded in collaborative learning environments, yet their impact on the processes of argumentative knowledge construction remains insufficiently understood. Emerging conceptualisations of agentic AI and artificial agency suggest that such systems possess bounded autonomy, interactivity, and adaptability, allowing them to engage as epistemic participants rather than mere instructional tools. Building on this theoretical foundation, the present study investigates how agentic AI, designed as undercover teammates with either supportive or contrarian personas, shapes the epistemic and social dynamics of collaborative reasoning. Drawing on Weinberger and Fischer's (2006) four-dimensional framework, participation, epistemic reasoning, argument structure, and social modes of co-construction, we analysed synchronous discourse data from 212 human and 64 AI participants (92 triads) engaged in an analytical problem-solving task. Mixed-effects and epistemic network analyses revealed that AI teammates maintained balanced participation but substantially reorganised epistemic and social processes: supportive personas promoted conceptual integration and consensus-oriented reasoning, whereas contrarian personas provoked critical elaboration and conflict-driven negotiation. Epistemic adequacy, rather than participation volume, predicted individual learning gains, indicating that agentic AI's educational value lies in enhancing the quality and coordination of reasoning rather than amplifying discourse quantity. These findings extend CSCL theory by conceptualising agentic AI as epistemic and social participants, bounded yet adaptive collaborators that redistribute cognitive and argumentative labour in hybrid human-AI learning environments.

cs.HC↗