arXiv subjects

Xihang Wang

Publications and source records attributed to Xihang Wang.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Evaluation Principles for MRI-MRA Registration in Trigeminal Neuralgia: An ROI-Centered Neurovascular Benchmark

Preoperative evaluation of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) often requires joint interpretation of structural MRI, which depicts the trigeminal nerve and surrounding cisternal anatomy, and time-of-flight MRA, which highlights vascular structures. Although MRI-MRA fusion is clinically attractive for visualizing neurovascular compression, this task is poorly captured by conventional whole-brain registration evaluation because the clinically relevant target is a small trigeminal ROI, vessel annotations are partial and clinically focused, local TOF-MRA contrast is variable, and field-of-view mismatch can limit deformable alignment. We formulate TN MRI-MRA fusion as an ROI-centered neurovascular registration-evaluation problem and construct a benchmark from 149 patients with clinician-annotated bilateral trigeminal ROIs. Six representative registration pipelines were evaluated using local image-based metrics, segmentation-derived vessel-localization metrics, prediction-volume analysis, and contrast- and FOV-stratified comparisons. Conventional evaluation summaries were often misleading: local image similarity, vessel-background separability, and downstream vessel localization did not co-rank methods; one-sided vessel distances were strongly affected by predicted vessel extent under partial annotations; and local MRA contrast determined when vessel-separability metrics were informative. Deformable refinement provided only a small, FOV-dependent benefit over affine alignment, while reader review showed that locally favorable vessel distances could coexist with globally implausible registrations. These findings indicate that TN MRI-MRA registration should be evaluated as a local, vessel-aware, contrast-sensitive, and FOV-aware visualization task rather than as generic multimodal brain registration. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/jhuldr/TN-Reg-Benchmark.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Purifying Multimodal Retrieval: Fragment-Level Evidence Selection for RAG

Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MRAG) is widely adopted for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) with external evidence to reduce hallucinations. Despite its success, most existing MRAG frameworks treat retrieved evidence as indivisible documents, implicitly assuming that all content within a document is equally informative. In practice, however, sometimes only a small fraction of a document is relevant to a given query, while the remaining content introduces substantial noise that may lead to performance degradation. We address this fundamental limitation by reframing MRAG as a fine-grained evidence selection problem. We propose Fragment-level Evidence Selection for RAG (FES-RAG), a framework that selects atomic multimodal fragments rather than entire documents as grounding evidence. FES-RAG decomposes retrieved multimodal documents into sentence-level textual fragments and region-level visual fragments, enabling precise identification of evidence that directly supports generation. To guide fragment selection, we introduce Fragment Information Gain (FIG), a principled metric that measures the marginal contribution of each fragment to the MLLM's generation confidence. Based on FIG, we distill fragment-level utility judgments from a high-capacity MLLM into a lightweight selector, achieving accurate evidence selection with low inference overhead. Experiments on the M2RAG benchmark show that FES-RAG consistently outperforms state-of-the-art document-level MRAG methods, achieving up to 27 percent relative improvement in CIDEr. By selecting fewer yet more informative fragments, our approach substantially reduces context length while improving factual accuracy and generation coherence.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

MEG-RAG: Quantifying Multi-modal Evidence Grounding for Evidence Selection in RAG

Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MRAG) addresses key limitations of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), such as hallucination and outdated knowledge. However, current MRAG systems struggle to distinguish whether retrieved multimodal data truly supports the semantic core of an answer or merely provides superficial relevance. Existing metrics often rely on heuristic position-based confidence, which fails to capture the informational density of multimodal entities. To address this, we propose Multi-modal Evidence Grounding (MEG), a semantic-aware metric that quantifies the contribution of retrieved evidence. Unlike standard confidence measures, MEG utilizes Semantic Certainty Anchoring, focusing on high-IDF information-bearing tokens that better capture the semantic core of the answer. Building on MEG, we introduce MEG-RAG, a framework that trains a multimodal reranker to align retrieved evidence with the semantic anchors of the ground truth. By prioritizing high-value content based on semantic grounding rather than token probability distributions, MEG-RAG improves the accuracy and multimodal consistency of generated outputs. Extensive experiments on the M$^2$RAG benchmark show that MEG-RAG consistently outperforms strong baselines and demonstrates robust generalization across different teacher models.

cs.CL↗