arXiv subjects

Xijin Chen

Publications and source records attributed to Xijin Chen.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Using joint models in phase I dose-finding designs in oncology: considerations for frequentist approaches

Dose-finding trials for oncology studies are traditionally designed to assess safety in the early stages of drug development. With the rise of molecularly targeted therapies and immuno-oncology compounds, biomarker-driven approaches have gained significant importance. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that incorporates multiple values of a predictive biomarker to assist in evaluating binary toxicity outcomes using the factorization of a joint model in phase I dose-finding oncology trials. The proposed joint model framework, which utilizes additional repeated biomarker values as an early predictive marker for potential toxicity, is compared to the likelihood-based continual reassessment method (CRM) using only binary toxicity data, across various dose-toxicity relationship scenarios. Our findings highlight a critical limitation of likelihood-based approaches in early-phase dose-finding studies with small sample sizes: estimation challenges that have been previously overlooked in the phase I dose-escalation setting. We explore potential remedies to address these challenges and emphasize the appropriate use of likelihood-based methods. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed joint model framework, by integrating biomarker information, can alleviate estimation problems in the the likelihood-based continual reassessment method (CRM) and improve the proportion of correct selection. However, we highlight that the inherent data limitations in early-phase dose-finding studies remain a significant challenge that cannot fully be overcomed in the frequentist framework.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2024

Next generation clinical trials: Seamless designs and master protocols

Background: Drug development is often inefficient, costly and lengthy, yet it is essential for evaluating the safety and efficacy of new interventions. Compared with other disease areas, this is particularly true for Phase II / III cancer clinical trials where high attrition rates and reduced regulatory approvals are being seen. In response to these challenges, seamless clinical trials and master protocols have emerged to streamline the drug development process. Methods: Seamless clinical trials, characterized by their ability to transition seamlessly from one phase to another, can lead to accelerating the development of promising therapies while Master protocols provide a framework for investigating multiple treatment options and patient subgroups within a single trial. Results: We discuss the advantages of these methods through real trial examples and the principals that lead to their success while also acknowledging the associated regulatory considerations and challenges. Conclusion: Seamless designs and Master protocols have the potential to improve confirmatory clinical trials. In the disease area of cancer, this ultimately means that patients can receive life-saving treatments sooner.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2022

Some performance considerations when using multi-armed bandit algorithms in the presence of missing data

When comparing the performance of multi-armed bandit algorithms, the potential impact of missing data is often overlooked. In practice, it also affects their implementation where the simplest approach to overcome this is to continue to sample according to the original bandit algorithm, ignoring missing outcomes. We investigate the impact on performance of this approach to deal with missing data for several bandit algorithms through an extensive simulation study assuming the rewards are missing at random. We focus on two-armed bandit algorithms with binary outcomes in the context of patient allocation for clinical trials with relatively small sample sizes. However, our results apply to other applications of bandit algorithms where missing data is expected to occur. We assess the resulting operating characteristics, including the expected reward. Different probabilities of missingness in both arms are considered. The key finding of our work is that when using the simplest strategy of ignoring missing data, the impact on the expected performance of multi-armed bandit strategies varies according to the way these strategies balance the exploration-exploitation trade-off. Algorithms that are geared towards exploration continue to assign samples to the arm with more missing responses (which being perceived as the arm with less observed information is deemed more appealing by the algorithm than it would otherwise be). In contrast, algorithms that are geared towards exploitation would rapidly assign a high value to samples from the arms with a current high mean irrespective of the level observations per arm. Furthermore, for algorithms focusing more on exploration, we illustrate that the problem of missing responses can be alleviated using a simple mean imputation approach.

stat.ML↗