arXiv subjects

Xinbao Sun

Publications and source records attributed to Xinbao Sun.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

When to Trust the BIM: Identifiability-Aware LiDAR-Inertial--BIM Fusion under As-Built Deviations

Building information models (BIM) can provide a global geometric reference for robot localization with LiDAR-inertial odometry (LIO). However, as-built deviations from the as-designed model mean that a disagreement between a scan and the BIM may arise from a pose error, an offset wall surface (an as-built deviation or an unmodeled object in front of the wall), or a shifted room, and in some geometries these explanations produce identical observations. In this paper, we formalize this attribution problem as fault identification over three fault classes and derive a geometric criterion for when attribution is possible. Building on it, we propose an identifiability-aware method that reports an attribution only when the fault is attributable; otherwise, it retains the candidates, defers BIM updates and BIM-based pose corrections in the ambiguous directions, and recovers once new references arrive. In the pre-registered two-dimensional study, on cases whose fault is detectable but not attributable, the method's conditional error rate was 0.83%, against 31.67% for a baseline with uncertainty-based abstention at the same answer rate. On the 5,600 attributable cases, the method reported a unique attribution 5,574 times, with no incorrect attributions. In paired fault injections in a laboratory room with its IFC model and on three floors of the SLABIM dataset, it raised no off-target attribution (0 of 168 conditions in the laboratory; 0 of 1,302 on SLABIM) and attributed all eight laboratory faults predicted to be attributable, whereas both reproduced baselines raised off-target structural flags in every setting.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

EnterpriseRAG: Benchmarking LLM Instruction Adherence and Robustness under Non-Ideal Enterprise Retrieval

Enterprise RAG deployments face a critical reliability gap: while LLMs satisfy 80% of individual constraints, only 26.8% of responses meet all requirements simultaneously, revealing a 57-point orchestration gap. Existing benchmarks assume clean retrieval with simple queries, failing to capture production conditions where noisy documents and multi-dimensional constraints coexist. We introduce EnterpriseRAG, a benchmark of 983 expert-validated samples across six domains that systematically simulates three failure modes absent from prior work: retrieval noise, knowledge gaps, and factual conflicts, coupled with complex instructions. Evaluation of 13 state-of-the-art LLMs reveals a severe instruction adherence collapse, where high per-constraint satisfaction masks low holistic compliance. Critical findings expose deep barriers under knowledge gaps and factual conflicts, even with reasoning-enhanced inference, indicating production RAG requires explicit context-aware protocols and calibrated judgment. EnterpriseRAG provides a reproducible foundation for measuring and closing these gaps, directly informing deployment decisions for enterprise-scale RAG systems. We will release the benchmark and evaluation framework upon publication.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

CCR-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Complex Constraints, Control Flows, and Real-World Cases

Enhancing the ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow complex instructions is critical for their deployment in real-world applications. However, existing evaluation methods often oversimplify instruction complexity as a mere additive combination of atomic constraints, failing to adequately capture the high-dimensional complexity arising from the intricate interplay of content and format, logical workflow control, and real-world applications. This leads to a significant gap between current evaluation practices and practical demands. To bridge this gap, we introduce CCR-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to assess LLMs' adherence to complex instructions. CCR-Bench is characterized by: (1) deep entanglement of content and formatting requirements in task specifications; (2) instructions that involve intricate task decomposition, conditional reasoning, and procedural planning; and (3) evaluation samples derived entirely from real-world industrial scenarios. Extensive experiments on CCR-Bench demonstrate that even state-of-the-art models exhibit substantial performance deficiencies, clearly quantifying the gap between current LLM capabilities and the demands of realworld instruction understanding. We believe that CCR-Bench offers a more rigorous and realistic evaluation framework, advancing the development of LLMs toward the next generation of models capable of understanding and executing complex tasks in industrial applications.

cs.CL↗