arXiv subjects

Xing Hu

Publications and source records attributed to Xing Hu.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2026

Diffploit: Facilitating Cross-Version Exploit Migration for Open Source Library Vulnerabilities

Exploits are commonly used to demonstrate the presence of library vulnerabilities and validate their impact across different versions. However, their direct application to alternative versions often fails due to breaking changes introduced during evolution. These failures stem from both changes in triggering conditions (e.g., API refactorings) and broken dynamic environments (e.g., build or runtime errors), which are challenging to interpret and adapt manually. Existing techniques primarily focus on code-level trace alignment through fuzzing, which is both time-consuming and insufficient for handling environment-level failures. Moreover, they often fall short when dealing with complicated triggering condition changes across versions. To overcome this, we propose Diffploit, an iterative, diff-driven exploit migration method structured around two key modules: the Context Module and the Migration Module. The Context Module dynamically constructs contexts derived from analyzing behavioral discrepancies between the target and reference versions, which capture the failure symptom and its related diff hunks. Leveraging these contexts, the Migration Module guides an LLM-based adaptation through an iterative feedback loop, balancing exploration of diff candidates and gradual refinement to resolve reproduction failures effectively. We evaluate Diffploit on a large-scale dataset containing 102 Java CVEs and 689 version-migration tasks across 79 libraries. Diffploit successfully migrates 84.2% exploits, outperforming the change-aware test repair tool TARGET by 52.0% and the rule-based tool in IDEA by 61.6%. Beyond technical effectiveness, Diffploit identifies 5 CVE reports with incorrect affected version ranges, three of which have been confirmed. It also discovers 111 unreported vulnerable versions in the GitHub Advisory Database.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

RACE-Bench: A Reasoning-Augmented Benchmark for Repository-Level Code Agents on Feature Addition

Repository-level code agents have shown strong promise in real-world feature addition tasks, making reliable evaluation of their capabilities increasingly important. However, existing benchmarks primarily evaluate these agents as black boxes based on final test correctness, providing limited insight into how they reason and where failures arise. To address this limitation, we introduce RACE-bench, a reasoning-augmented benchmark for evaluating code agents on repository-level feature addition tasks. RACE-bench contains 528 real-world feature addition instances from 12 open-source repositories. Each instance is paired with executable patch verification and structured intermediate reference reasoning covering issue understanding, file localization, implementation tasks, and step decomposition. Based on this design, we introduce a dual-track evaluation framework that jointly measures patch correctness and intermediate reasoning alignment with developer-accepted reference trajectories. We evaluate three representative repository-level code agents on RACE-bench. On the full benchmark, Resolved Rate ranges from 29% to 70% across different agents. Our reasoning-level analysis further shows that while current agents perform well at understanding high-level intent, their performance degrades substantially when translating intent into concrete implementation steps. We also find patches that can be applied but still fail the tests cover fewer reference-reasoning elements (35.7% lower recall) and contain more unsupported reasoning elements (94.1% higher over-prediction) than successful patches. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating repository-level code agents beyond final patch correctness by examining the quality of their reasoning processes.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

SmellCC: A Tool for Automated Code Smells Remediation

Code smells significantly threaten software maintainability by accumulating technical debt, yet developers often lack the resources to manually address these flaws under tight release schedules. While static analysis tools like SonarQube provide precise detection, they function largely as passive alert systems, leaving the burden of refactoring on developers. To bridge this gap, we present a novel cleaning tool, namely SmellCC, a Visual Studio Code extension that augments SonarQube with an LLM-based pipeline to automatically detect and refactor Python code smells. By employing Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and few-shot learning, SmellCC provides in-place, one-click remediation for the top-10 most frequent smells, effectively preventing the accumulation of technical debt during development. Our quantitative evaluation demonstrates that our SmellCC is promising in helping developers effectively eliminate code smells (96.8\% cleaning rate) with high accuracy (i.e., 91.3\%), ensuring that the refactored code remains syntactically correct and behavior-preserving, thereby significantly improving long-term software maintainability.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

AgentExecutor: Partial Code Execution via Agentic Context Generation

Executing code snippets is essential for dynamic program analysis, but it remains challenging to execute an arbitrary code snippet due to issues like missing context and incomplete dependencies. Existing approaches to partial code execution, such as LExecutor and Treefix, leverage the power of language models to infer missing information and enable execution. However, they suffer from (i) limited action spaces and feedback, and (ii) rigid optimization strategies, which restrict their effectiveness and efficiency. In this paper, we propose AgentExecutor, a novel multi-agent framework for partial code execution. Our approach introduces a three-phase design: execution environment preparation, dynamic exploration with iterative refinement, and prefix evolution via program synthesis. Supported by the power of LLM agents who can think, act, and get feedback iteratively, AgentExecutor is able to autonomously explore a richer action space, enabling diverse operations such as creating resource files and resolving environment configuration. Furthermore, it adopts adaptive optimization strategies, including coverage-guided context pruning and prefix evolution via program synthesis, to systematically improve the execution quality of partial code. We evaluate AgentExecutor on two widely used datasets comprising Stack Overflow snippets and open-source project code. The results show that AgentExecutor achieves up to 94% and 90% code coverage, outperforming the state-of-the-art approach Treefix by 19.9% and 13.8%, respectively. In addition, AgentExecutor significantly reduces execution time (by up to 80.3%) and cost (by up to 56.6%). These findings demonstrate that AgentExecutor provides an effective and efficient solution for partial code execution.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Ensemble Fuzzing with Dynamic Resource Scheduling and Multidimensional Seed Evaluation

Fuzzing is widely used for detecting bugs and vulnerabilities, with various techniques proposed to enhance its effectiveness. To combine the advantages of multiple technologies, researchers proposed ensemble fuzzing, which integrates multiple base fuzzers. Despite promising results, state-of-the-art ensemble fuzzing techniques face limitations in resource scheduling and performance evaluation, leading to unnecessary resource waste. In this paper, we propose Legion, a novel ensemble fuzzing framework that dynamically schedules resources during the ensemble fuzzing campaign. We designed a novel resource scheduling algorithm based on the upper confidence bound algorithm to reduce the resource consumption of ineffective base fuzzers. Additionally, we introduce a multidimensional seed evaluation strategy, which considers multiple metrics to achieve more comprehensive fine-grained performance evaluation. We implemented Legion as a prototype tool and evaluated its effectiveness on Google's fuzzer-test-suite as well as real-world open-source projects. Results show that Legion outperforms existing state-of-the-art base fuzzers and ensemble fuzzing techniques, detecting 20 bugs in real-world open-source projects-five previously unknown and three classified as CVEs.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Don't Use a Cannon to Kill a Fly: Lightweight Model Editing for LLMs to Correct Deprecated API Recommendations

Pre-trained or fine-tuned on large code corpora, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in code completion tasks. However, their embedded knowledge is constrained by the timeliness of training data, which often includes code using deprecated APIs. Consequently, LLMs frequently generate deprecated APIs that will no longer be supported in future versions of third-party libraries. While retraining LLMs on updated codebases could refresh their API knowledge, this approach is computationally expensive. Recently, lightweight model editing methods have emerged to efficiently correct specific knowledge in LLMs. However, it remains unclear whether these methods can effectively update deprecated API knowledge and enable edited models to generate up-to-date APIs. To address this gap, we conduct the first systematic study applying 10 state-of-the-art model editing techniques to update deprecated API knowledge in three LLMs: Qwen2.5-Coder, CodeGemma, and DeepSeek-Coder. We introduce EDAPIBench, a dedicated benchmark featuring over 70 deprecated APIs from 8 popular Python libraries, with more than 3,000 editing instances. Our results show that the parameter-efficient fine-tuning method AdaLoRA achieves the best performance in enabling edited models to generate correct, up-to-date APIs, but falls short in Specificity (i.e., the editing influences untargeted knowledge). To resolve this, we propose AdaLoRA-L, which defines "Common API Layers" (layers within the LLMs with high importance across all APIs, storing general knowledge and excluded from editing) and restricts edits exclusively to "Specific API Layers" (layers with high importance only for the target API, storing the API-specific knowledge). Experimental results demonstrate that AdaLoRA-L significantly improves Specificity while maintaining comparable performance across other evaluation metrics.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Assessing the Cross-Version Applicability of Java Library Vulnerability Exploits

Open-source software supply chain security relies heavily on assessing affected versions of library vulnerabilities. While prior studies have leveraged exploits for verifying vulnerability affected versions, they point out a key limitation that exploits are version-specific and cannot be directly applied across library versions. Despite being widely acknowledged, this limitation has not been systematically validated at scale, leaving the actual applicability of exploits across versions unexplored. To fill this gap, we conduct the first large-scale empirical study on exploit applicability across library versions. We construct a comprehensive dataset consisting of 259 exploits spanning 128 Java libraries and 28,150 historical versions, covering 61 CWEs that account for 76.33% of vulnerabilities in Maven. Leveraging this dataset, we execute each exploit against the library version history and compare the execution outcomes with our manually annotated ground-truth affected versions. We further investigate the root causes of inconsistencies between exploit execution and ground truth, and explore strategies for exploit migration. Our results (RQ1) show that, even without migration, exploits achieve 83.0% recall and 99.3% precision in identifying affected versions in Java, outperforming most widely used vulnerability databases and assessment tools. Notably, this capability enables us to contribute 796 confirmed missing affected versions to the CPE dictionary. We investigate the remaining exploit failures (RQ2) and find that they mainly stem from compatibility issues introduced by library evolution and changing environmental constraints. Based on these observations, we manually migrate exploits for 1,885 versions and distill a taxonomy of 10 strategies from these successful adaptation cases (RQ3), thereby increasing the overall recall to 96.1%.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

An Efficient Fault-Tolerance Scheme for CKKS Computation on CPUs

Fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) enables computation on encrypted data, but its long ciphertext dataflow and high-dimensional modular arithmetic make it vulnerable to silent data corruption caused by transient hardware faults. Existing protection methods either target dedicated accelerators or impose substantial execution, modular-arithmetic, and memory-access overheads on CPUs. This work presents an efficient fault-tolerance scheme for CPU-based CKKS computation. It checks the input-output consistency of polynomial operators while reducing protection overhead at three levels. First, modulus-aware bucket checksum exploits wide CPU accumulators to reduce expensive modular reductions. Second, dataflow-fused in-operator checking embeds checksum accumulation into operator dataflows, avoiding separate scans of long ciphertext polynomials. Third, cross-operator check fusion eliminates redundant checksum computations between adjacent operators while preserving end-to-end checking invariants. We implement the scheme in OpenFHE and evaluate it on representative encrypted applications and ciphertext primitives under random single-bit transient faults. It achieves a 100 percent empirical detection rate across 150,000 non-crashing corrupted-result cases and maintains application accuracy close to the fault-free baseline over a wide range of fault rates. The scheme incurs only 6.0 percent to 8.4 percent runtime overhead, averaging 6.8 percent, and reduces average protection overhead by 4.9 times compared with direct checksum-based protection.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2026

PrimitiveVLA: Learning Reusable Motion Primitives for Efficient and Generalizable Robotic Manipulation

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models offer a promising paradigm for generalist robotic policies, yet their adaptation is hindered by data inefficiency and poor generalization. We argue that these bottlenecks stem from the prevailing Direct Instruction-to-Control Mapping, which forces models to memorize monolithic trajectories rather than reusable motion patterns, i.e., primitives. We propose PrimitiveVLA, a framework that shifts this paradigm toward a Primitive-Centric Disassemble & Assemble paradigm. Supported by a shared Multimodal Canonical Representation (MCR), PrimitiveVLA unifies two phases: (1) Fine-tuning-phase Disassembly, which uses an automated pipeline to disassemble demonstrations into reusable primitives; and (2) Inference-phase Assembly, which employs a VLM-based planner and an LLM-generated switch module for robust closed-loop execution. By disassembling tasks into reusable primitives, PrimitiveVLA enables VLA models to learn invariant motion patterns instead of task-specific trajectories. Extensive experiments show that our framework improves data efficiency and achieves superior zero-shot generalization across unseen and long-horizon tasks.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

When Models Meet Users: An Empirical Study of Perceptions of General LLMs and Multimodal LLMs on Hugging Face

Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly evolved from general-purpose systems to multimodal models capable of processing text, images, and audio. As both general-purpose LLMs (GLLMs) and multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) gain widespread adoption, understanding user perceptions in real-world settings becomes increasingly important. However, existing studies often rely on surveys or platform-specific data (e.g., Reddit or GitHub issues), which either constrain user feedback through predefined questions or overemphasize failure-driven, debugging-oriented discussions, thus failing to capture diverse, experience-driven, and cross-model user perspectives in practice. To address this issue, we conduct an empirical study of user discussions on Hugging Face, a major model hub with diverse models and active communities. We collect and manually annotate 662 discussion threads from 38 representative models (21 GLLMs and 17 MLLMs), and develop a three-level taxonomy to systematically characterize user concerns. Our analysis reveals that LLM access barriers, generation quality, and deployment and invocation complexity are the most prominent concerns, alongside issues such as documentation limitations and resource constraints. Based on these findings, we derive actionable implications for improving LLM ecosystem.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Automating Just-In-Time Python Type Annotation Updating

Type annotations are more and more popular in Python projects to avoid type errors caused by Python's dynamic typing feature. However, when developers change source code, these type annotations are often neglected or overlooked, resulting in outdated and inconsistent type annotations. Such obsolete type annotations can hinder program comprehension, mislead developers, and even introduce bugs in the future. Therefore, it is necessary to avoid and correct these inconsistent type annotations from the very beginning. In this work, we argue that obsolete type annotations can be reduced and even avoided by automatically updating type annotations alongside code changes. We refer to this task as "Just-In-Time (JIT) type annotation updating". To solve this task, we propose a novel LLM-based approach named TypeUp (Type Annotation Updator) to automate this task. TypeUp can automatically generate new type annotations based on the old type annotations and corresponding code changes. Specifically, TypeUp guides LLM to perform type annotation updates by eliciting its knowledge and logical reasoning power and learning from similar code changes. The evaluation results show that TypeUp outperforms state-of-the-art type infer approach (i.e., TypeGen) by 41.9% on our task. Moreover, we conducted an in-the-wild evaluation with real-world software projects, 20 out of 25 type annotation updates generated by our approach have already been confirmed by developers, showing our approach's practical value in real-world environments.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Refploit: Facilitating Exploit Construction via Code-Agent Trajectory Repair

Vulnerability exploits play a crucial role in assessing the downstream impact of Java library vulnerabilities. While some vulnerabilities are accompanied by disclosed exploit references, automatically reproducing such references into runnable exploits remains challenging because they are often incomplete, unstructured, or only describe partial reproduction steps. Recent code agents provide a promising way to automate this process, but our study shows that their generated exploits often appear successful without triggering the actual vulnerable logic, such as replacing vulnerable APIs with self-implemented functions. To address this, we propose Refploit, an LLM-based trajectory recovery framework for facilitating vulnerability reproduction from public exploit references. The key insight is that a failed agent trajectory is not entirely useless. It may have already completed some reproduction subtasks while also revealing misleading directions that should be avoided. Refploit first validates an agent-generated exploit through differential execution. When the exploit is ineffective, Refploit analyzes its reproduction progress, locates the trajectory segments associated with the reproduction progress, and derives constraints to guide focused recovery. We evaluate Refploit on three open-source Java vulnerability datasets, covering 172 exploit references for 143 vulnerabilities. Under DeepSeek-V4-Flash, Refploit successfully reproduces 138 exploits, achieving a reproduction rate of 80.2%. It achieves a 64.3% relative improvement over the initially generated trajectories and outperforms both the SOTA exploit-generation method PoCGen and advanced code agents such as Codex with GPT-5.4. We further adapt Refploit to another code agent and observe consistent improvements, demonstrating its generality.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Mitigating Package Hallucinations in Large Language Models via Model Editing

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in software engineering tasks, such as code generation, library recommendation, and dependency configuration. However, recent studies show that LLMs may suffer from package hallucination, where they generate non-existent or invalid package names. These hallucinations can be exploited in software supply chain attacks, as attackers may register malicious packages under hallucinated names. Therefore, mitigating package hallucination is important for improving the reliability and security of LLM-assisted software development. In this paper, we introduce BOUND, a lightweight localized model editing framework for mitigating package hallucinations in LLMs. BOUND formulates package hallucination mitigation as a package-validity boundary editing problem, where the boundary refers to the model's ability to distinguish valid packages from hallucinated package names under a given task context. It first locates modules related to package hallucination through a risk-aware localization strategy, and then edits these modules with lightweight LoRA adapters using a boundary-aware objective that reinforces valid packages, suppresses hallucinated packages, and preserves locality behavior. Experimental results show that BOUND effectively reduces package hallucinations while preserving valid package recommendations. In the package recommendation task, BOUND reduces package-level hallucination rate (Package-HR) by 79.9% on edit prompts and by 65.4% on unseen prompts. The learned package-validity boundary further generalizes to other package-related tasks, reducing Package-HR by 12.8% in code generation and by 34.0% in pip install recommendation. These results show that BOUND refines the package-validity boundary of LLMs and improves the reliability of package-related outputs.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

GUIMigrator: Semantics-Preserving Transpilation from Android XML to Compose and SwiftUI

Constructing user interfaces (UIs) is one of the most resource-intensive tasks in mobile development, often consuming more than half of overall effort. Although declarative frameworks such as Jetpack Compose (Android) and SwiftUI (iOS) have become mainstream, the majority of existing Android apps still rely on legacy XML-based layouts. Migrating these UIs to declarative paradigms is essential for maintainability and cross-platform reuse, but manual migration is costly, error-prone, and difficult to scale. We present GUIMigrator, a semantics-preserving framework that automates the migration of Android XML-based UIs to Jetpack Compose and SwiftUI. We design the Semantic UI Transpiler (SUT), which abstracts layout structures and resource semantics from legacy XML and systematically re-expresses them using the component abstractions and idioms of modern declarative frameworks. This design ensures that migrated UIs preserve both visual fidelity and functional equivalence, while generating idiomatic, compilable code that maintains cross-platform consistency with minimal manual intervention. By separating semantic interpretation from platform-specific realization, GUIMigrator provides a deterministic yet extensible basis for cross-platform modernization, avoiding the unpredictability of purely generative approaches. We evaluate GUIMigrator on 31 open-source applications across ten domains. Results show that GUIMigrator achieves high migration completeness and strong visual similarity (81.9% SSIM on Jetpack Compose and 78.2% on SwiftUI on average), while maintaining substantially higher project-wide semantic coherence (PSC) than modern LLM baselines. In addition, GUIMigrator reduces manual development effort by over 90%.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

IntentTester: Intent-Driven Multi-agent Framework for Cross-Library Test Migration

Unit tests capture both functional checks and domain-specific knowledge, but this knowledge remains locked within individual projects and is rarely reused across libraries with overlapping functionality. Existing migration techniques based on structural code mappings (e.g., API signatures) often break down under divergent designs or cross-language settings, resulting in non-executable migrated tests. In this paper, we present IntentTester, a multi-agent framework for intent-driven test reuse. Instead of translating raw code, IntentTester abstracts tests into a language-agnostic Test Description Language (TDL), aligns them with semantically related entities and dependencies in a repository graph, and synthesizes executable tests through LLM-guided reasoning and iterative validation. This design enables cross-library and cross-language migration without manual intervention, producing migrated tests that existing structure-mapping approaches cannot achieve. We evaluate IntentTester on nine open-source projects across three domains (JSON, HTML, and Time) and two languages (Java and Python). IntentTester generates 2,776 syntactically correct tests with 85\% correctness; in comparison, the two baselines achieve 51\% and 43\%. Among them, 2,410 tests executed successfully, yielding a 74\% effectiveness rate. Beyond higher success rates, IntentTester also surfaced previously unknown defects including stack overflows, null dereferences, and parsing inconsistencies, several of which have been acknowledged or patched by maintainers. Our results show that intent-driven migration shifts the focus from code mappings to semantic alignment, allowing practical cross-library and cross-language test reuse while improving test quality and exposing implementation flaws.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

TWLA: Achieving Ternary Weights and Low-Bit Activations for LLMs via Post-Training Quantization

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit exceptional general language processing capabilities, but their memory and compute costs hinder deployment. Ternarization has emerged as a promising compression technique, offering significant reductions in model size and inference complexity. However, existing methods struggle with heavy-tailed activation distributions and therefore keep activations in high precision, fundamentally limiting end-to-end inference acceleration. To overcome this limitation, we propose TWLA, a post-training quantization (PTQ) framework that achieves 1.58-bit weight compression and 4-bit activation quantization while maintaining high accuracy. TWLA comprises three components: (1) Euclidean-to-Manifold Asymmetric Ternary Quantizer (E2M-ATQ) minimizes layer-output error under weight ternarization via a two-stage optimization from Euclidean initialization to manifold relocation; (2) Kronecker Orthogonal Tri-Modal Shaping (KOTMS) applies a Kronecker-structured orthogonal rotation to reshape weights into ternary-friendly tri-modal distributions, while the shared rotation statistically suppresses activation outliers; and (3) Inter-Layer Aware Activation Mixed Precision (ILA-AMP) explicitly introduces adjacent-layer second-order interaction costs in bit allocation and jointly optimizes for the layer-wise disparity of activation quantization gains induced by the shared orthogonal transform, preventing cascades triggered by a few weak layers. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TWLA maintains high accuracy under W1.58A4, while delivering significant inference acceleration. The code is available at https://github.com/Kishon-zzx/TWLA.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

ATTAIN: Automated Exploit Failure Analysis through Trace-Driven Diff Analysis

Exploits are widely used to check whether library vulnerabilities appear in different versions and to mark affected version ranges. Exploit-based checks sometimes fail because exploits stop running on many versions after API or environment changes. Commit-based methods, such as SZZ-style analysis, sometimes miss the right introduce commits and spread labels incorrectly along long version chains. These problems leave many affected versions unlabeled or wrongly labeled and make manual exploit failure analysis very expensive and impractical at scale. We present ATTAIN, a trace-driven diff analysis framework with three modules to assess vulnerability presence across evolving library versions. The modules are trace construction, diff exploration, and affected-version judgment. The trace construction module executes an exploit across historical library versions and compares their behaviors to capture cross-version execution divergences. Using these divergences, the diff exploration module guides an LLM through a finite-state tool loop to autonomously search over version changes and collect vulnerability-relevant diff hunks. The affected-version judgment module reasons over the collected evidence to determine whether the vulnerability exists in each version and outputs the affected version range. We evaluate ATTAIN on an extensive dataset comprising 224 CVEs and 25,943 library versions across 128 libraries. ATTAIN achieves an F1-score of 93.24%, outperforming the commit-based methods V-SZZ and LLM4SZZ by 116.28% and 33.30%, respectively. ATTAIN uses short tool-guided prompts and a fixed number of iterations, keeping token usage low. It matches or surpasses existing methods on frequent CWE types, including cases where exploit runs fail for non-vulnerability reasons or commit messages do not clearly delimit affected versions.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

SecureVibeBench: Benchmarking Secure Vibe Coding of AI Agents via Reconstructing Vulnerability-Introducing Scenarios

Large language model-powered code agents are rapidly transforming software engineering, yet the security risks of their generated code have become a critical concern. Existing benchmarks have provided valuable insights, but they fail to capture scenarios in which vulnerabilities are actually introduced by human developers, making fair comparisons between humans and agents infeasible. We therefore introduce SecureVibeBench, a benchmark of 105 C/C++ secure coding tasks sourced from 41 projects in OSS-Fuzz for code agents. SecureVibeBench has the following features: (i) realistic task settings that require multi-file edits in large repositories, (ii)~aligned contexts based on real-world open-source vulnerabilities with precisely identified vulnerability introduction points, and (iii) comprehensive evaluation that combines functionality testing and security checking with both static and dynamic oracles. We evaluate 5 popular code agents like OpenHands, supported by 5 LLMs (e.g., Claude sonnet 4.5) on SecureVibeBench. Results show that current agents struggle to produce both correct and secure code, as even the best-performing one, produces merely 23.8\% correct and secure solutions on SecureVibeBench. Our code and data are on https://github.com/iCSawyer/SecureVibeBench.

cs.SE↗