SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Xing-Yu Hu

Publications and source records attributed to Xing-Yu Hu.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Dense-set dependence in the Kat\v{e}tov order for uncountable coordinate ideals

For each countable ordinal $\alpha\geq 2$, Filip\'ow, Kowalczuk and Kwela introduced an ideal $\mathsf{conv}_\alpha$ on the countable compact ordinal space $\omega^\alpha+1$. Kowalczuk later proved that, for each countable limit ordinal $\lambda$, the ideal $\mathsf{conv}_{<\lambda}$ is the greatest lower bound of $\{\mathsf{conv}_\beta:\beta<\lambda\}$ in the Kat\v{e}tov order. At the first uncountable level, let $A\subseteq[2,\omega_1)$ be uncountable and let $D$ be a countable dense subset of $X_A=\prod_{\alpha\in A}(\omega^\alpha+1)$. The coordinate ideal $\mathsf{Conv}(A,D)$ on $D$ consists of those $B\subseteq D$ with $\pi_\alpha[B]\in\mathsf{conv}_\alpha$ for every $\alpha\in A$. For a pair $D\subseteq E$ of countable dense sets, call $\alpha$ non-small if $\pi_\alpha[E\setminus D]\notin\mathsf{conv}_\alpha$. In ZFC, if at most countably many coordinates are non-small, then $\mathsf{Conv}(A,D)\equiv_K\mathsf{Conv}(A,E)$. Under CH this countability bound is sharp: for every $A\subseteq[3,\omega_1)$ with $|A|=\aleph_1$, there are countable dense sets $D\subseteq D^*\subseteq X_A$ such that $\mathsf{Conv}(A,D^*)\leq_K\mathsf{Conv}(A,D)$ but $\mathsf{Conv}(A,D)\not\leq_K\mathsf{Conv}(A,D^*)$, and in particular $\mathsf{Conv}(A,D)$ and $\mathsf{Conv}(A,D^*)$ are not Kat\v{e}tov equivalent. The non-reduction is obtained, under CH, by diagonalizing along $\omega_1$ coordinates against the elements of $\omega^\omega$ that code retractions $D^*\to D$.

math.LO

Dense-Kernel and Closed-Core Reductions in the D-space Problem for Charming Spaces

Let X be a charming space with a Lindelof Sigma kernel Y, and let B be the closure of Y in X. We show that the question whether every charming space is a D-space can be reduced first to the dense-kernel case and then to a closed core. We define Obs_cc(Y,B) as the set of boundary points x in B minus Y such that, for every open neighborhood U of x in X, the intersection of U and Y is not countably compact, and let H be the closure of Obs_cc(Y,B) in B. We prove that the intersection of H with B minus Y is exactly Obs_cc(Y,B), and our main reduction theorem shows that X is a D-space if and only if H is. We also prove the following sufficient condition. If there is a closed set S contained in B minus Y with compact covering number less than the dominating number d, such that every point of B minus Y minus S has an open neighborhood U in X for which the intersection of U and Y is countably compact, then X is a D-space.

math.GN

Raikov Remainders of Quotients by Raikov-Complete Almost Metrizable Normal Subgroups

Let \(N\) be a closed normal subgroup of a topological group \(G\), and let \(\widehat q:\rho G\to\rho(G/N)\) extend the quotient homomorphism. We prove that \(r_\rho(G/N)=\widehat q\bigl(r_\rho(G)\bigr)\) holds if and only if \(\widehat q\) is onto and \(\widehat q^{-1}(G/N)=G\), and we show that neither condition implies the other. Both conditions hold whenever \(N\) is Raikov complete and almost metrizable. Consequently, pseudocompactness of \(r_\rho(G)\) passes to \(r_\rho(G/N)\). In particular, the conclusion applies to closed locally compact normal subgroups.

math.GN

Carrier ideals, tail obstructions, and remainder traces for ladder-system spaces

For a ladder-system space $X_L$ with carrier $S\subseteq E^{\omega_1}_\omega$, the finite-label uniformization property $M_{<\omega}$ characterizes countable metacompactness, and countable metacompactness is equivalent to the $\Delta$-property. Both equivalences are known for stationary carriers. For arbitrary carriers, an active-tail formulation gives a direct proof that $M_{<\omega}$ is equivalent to the $\Delta$-property and leads to a support-finite decomposition theorem, together with club-smallness and trace criteria that avoid explicit ladder-position thresholds. A club-gap argument, combined with Fodor's lemma, shows that finite and countable tail multiplicity determine the same carrier ideal, namely $\mathrm{NS}\restriction S$. Subsets of the isolated part that meet each ladder in only finitely many points have clopen remainder traces, and these traces form a generalized Boolean algebra. All such traces are disjoint from the carrier part of the remainder. Finally, the subcarriers whose restricted spaces are $\sigma$-closed discrete form an ideal $\mathcal{C}_L$ containing $\mathrm{NS}\restriction S$. If $X_L$ is a $\Delta$-space, a threshold-based gluing argument shows that $\mathcal{C}_L$ is a $\sigma$-ideal. Whether this holds for every ladder system remains open.

math.LO