Xinyi Mary Xie | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

VisTa3D: A Dataset and Benchmark for Thin Object Reconstruction from Vision, Tactile, and 3D Point Clouds

State-of-the-art 3D reconstruction models, whether from visual, range, or both, tend to underperform on thin objects. This is partially due to the small amount of space such objects occupy in RGB images and in 3D point clouds. To test the extent of their errors, we collected the first thin object dataset comprising of synchronized RGB images, depth maps, and tactile response maps, where each frame is associated with inertial measurements, camera pose and calibration, and groundtruth depth and segmentation maps obtained from laser scanning of thin objects. We hypothesize that tactile data can aid in the reconstruction of thin objects as their response maps provide local shape and deformation information. Our dataset, termed VisTa3D, comprises of 387 scenes covering 70 thin objects over 17 environments. We benchmarked current 3D reconstruction models on VisTa3D and found that, indeed, they exhibit low fidelity on thin objects. To test if tactile data can help, we introduce the first visual-range-tactile 3D reconstruction model as a baseline. Code and data: https://huggingface.co/datasets/shaniaguo/VisTa3D.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Tuning Out-of-Distribution (OOD) Detectors Without Given OOD Data

Existing out-of-distribution (OOD) detectors are often tuned by a separate dataset deemed OOD with respect to the training distribution of a neural network (NN). OOD detectors process the activations of NN layers and score the output, where parameters of the detectors are determined by fitting to an in-distribution (training) set and the aforementioned dataset chosen adhocly. At detector training time, this adhoc dataset may not be available or difficult to obtain, and even when it's available, it may not be representative of actual OOD data, which is often ''unknown unknowns." Current benchmarks may specify some left-out set from test OOD sets. We show that there can be significant variance in performance of detectors based on the adhoc dataset chosen in current literature, and thus even if such a dataset can be collected, the performance of the detector may be highly dependent on the choice. In this paper, we introduce and formalize the often neglected problem of tuning OOD detectors without a given ``OOD'' dataset. To this end, we present strong baselines as an attempt to approach this problem. Furthermore, we propose a new generic approach to OOD detector tuning that does not require any extra data other than those used to train the NN. We show that our approach improves over baseline methods consistently across higher-parameter OOD detector families, while being comparable across lower-parameter families.

cs.LG↗