arXiv subjects

Xiwen Teoh

Publications and source records attributed to Xiwen Teoh.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

WebTestPilot: Agentic End-to-End Web Testing against Natural Language Specification by Inferring Oracles with Symbolized GUI Elements

Visual language model (VLM) agents show great promise in automating end-to-end (E2E) web testing against requirements in natural language. However, the probabilistic nature of language models can have inherent hallucinations. Therefore, given a detected inconsistency between the requirement and the web application, it is hard to distinguish whether it stems from the hallucination or a real application bug. Addressing this issue presents two core technical challenges: the implicit oracle inference challenge, where the agent must act as its own oracle to implicitly decide if the application's behavior is correct without guidance, and the probabilistic inference challenge, where an LLM's inconsistent reasoning undermines its trustworthiness as an oracle. Existing LLM-based approaches fail to capture such implicit oracles, either by treating any page navigation that doesn't crash as a success, or by checking each state in isolation, thus missing bugs dependent on context from prior steps. We introduce WebTestPilot, an LLM-based agent designed to address these challenges. WebTestPilot uses (1) a symbolization layer which detects and symbolizes critical GUI elements on the web application into symbols (i.e., variables) and (2) translates natural language specification into a sequence of steps, each of which is equipped with inferred pre- and post-conditions over the symbols as an oracle. This oracle captures data, temporal, and causal dependencies, enabling the validation of implicit requirements. To advance research in this area, we build a benchmark of bug-injected web apps for evaluating NL-to-E2E testing. The results show that WebTestPilot achieves a task completion rate of 99%, with 96% precision and 96% recall in bug detection, outperforming the best baseline (+70 precision, +27 recall). The agent generalizes across diverse natural language inputs and model scales.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Compiling Large Multi-Modal Requirement Documents into Runnable Software Systems: From an Agentic Test-Driven Perspective

Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly improved programming efficiency by translating natural language into code, yet their performance deteriorates when handling large-scale, multi-modal requirement documents containing hundreds of scenarios, often producing incorrect implementations or missing critical constraints. To address this challenge, we propose ARC (Agentic Requirement Compilation), a framework that compiles DSL-based requirement documents into runnable software systems while automatically generating modular software architecture, comprehensive test suites, and traceability across requirements, design, and code. ARC adopts a bidirectional test-driven agentic workflow, combining a top-down architecture design phase with a bottom-up implementation phase to ensure that generated code satisfies synthesized tests. We evaluate ARC on six runnable web system benchmarks and the AppForge benchmark of 101 mobile app generation tasks. Across three independent trials, ARC consistently outperforms state-of-the-art LLM-based baselines, achieving 50.6% more GUI tests passed on average for web systems, a 100% compilation success rate, and a 68.3% test pass rate on AppForge. A user study with 21 participants further shows that users with limited programming experience can write DSL-based requirement documents containing up to 174 scenarios within an average of 5.6 hours to generate maintainable runnable systems, including a real-world ticket-booking application of approximately 10K lines of code.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

MINES: Explainable Anomaly Detection through Web API Invariant Inference

Detecting the anomalies of web applications, important infrastructures for running modern companies and governments, is crucial for providing reliable web services. Many modern web applications operate on web APIs (e.g., RESTful, SOAP, and WebSockets), their exposure invites intended attacks or unintended illegal visits, causing abnormal system behaviors. However, such anomalies can share very similar logs with normal logs, missing crucial information (which could be in database) for log discrimination. Further, log instances can be also noisy, which can further mislead the state-of-the-art log learning solutions to learn spurious correlation, resulting superficial models and rules for anomaly detection. In this work, we propose MINES which infers explainable API invariants for anomaly detection from the schema level instead of detailed raw log instances, which can (1) significantly discriminate noise in logs to identify precise normalities and (2) detect abnormal behaviors beyond the instrumented logs. Technically, MINES (1) converts API signatures into table schema to enhance the original database shema; and (2) infers the potential database constraints on the enhanced database schema to capture the potential relationships between APIs and database tables. MINES uses LLM for extracting potential relationship based on two given table structures; and use normal log instances to reject and accept LLM-generated invariants. Finally, MINES translates the inferred constraints into invariants to generate Python code for verifying the runtime logs. We extensively evaluate MINES on web-tamper attacks on the benchmarks of TrainTicket, NiceFish, Gitea, Mastodon, and NextCloud against baselines such as LogRobust, LogFormer, and WebNorm. The results show that MINES achieves high recall for the anomalies while introducing almost zero false positives, indicating a new state-of-the-art.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

PiMRef: Deducing Ever-evolving Spear-phishing Emails with Knowledge Base Invariants

Phishing email is a critical step in the cybercrime kill chain due to the high reachability of victims' email accounts and the low cost of launching phishing campaigns. This ever-evolving nature of phishing emails makes traditional rule-based and feature-engineering-based phishing email detectors fight an uphill battle in the cat-and-mouse game of defense and attack. In this work, we show that, large language models (LLMs) can be effectively exploited to generate profile-grounded spear-phishing, compromising major paradigms of phishing email detectors. To defend against such LLM-based spear-phishing attacks, we propose PiMRef, the first reference-based solution to detect ever-evolving phishing emails using knowledge-based invariants, targeting the identity-impersonation attacks that characterize spear-phishing. Our rationale lies in the fact that convincing phishing emails often include ``disprovable claims'', which contradict certain real-world facts. Technically, given an email, PiMRef (i) discovers the claimed identity of the sender, (ii) verifies the sender's email domain against a dynamically expandable knowledge base, and (iii) infers call-to-action instructions that encourage next-step engagement. Compared to existing baselines such as D-Fence, HelpHed, and ChatSpamDetector, PimRef reduces the false-positive rate to 0.81\% while maintaining a recall of 90.7\%-93.1\% on conventional phishing benchmarks such as Nazario and PhishPot. On SpearMail, our newly constructed benchmark of 14,672 LLM-generated spear-phishing emails targeting 681 public profiles, PimRef reaches a recall of 86.4\% without incurring additional false positives. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/code-philia/PhishEmail.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2025

GUIPilot: A Consistency-based Mobile GUI Testing Approach for Detecting Application-specific Bugs

In this work, we propose GUIPilot, an approach for detecting inconsistencies between the mobile design and their implementations. The mobile design usually consists of design mock-ups that specify (1) the expected screen appearances (e.g., widget layouts, colors, and shapes) and (2) the expected screen behaviors, regarding how one screen can transition into another (e.g., labeled widgets with textual description). Given a design mock-up and the implementation of its application, GUIPilot reports both their screen inconsistencies as well as process inconsistencies. On the one hand, GUIPilot detects the screen inconsistencies by abstracting every screen into a widget container where each widget is represented by its position, width, height, and type. By defining the partial order of widgets and the costs of replacing, inserting, and deleting widgets in a screen, we convert the screen-matching problem into an optimizable widget alignment problem. On the other hand, we translate the specified GUI transition into stepwise actions on the mobile screen (e.g., click, long-press, input text on some widgets). To this end, we propose a visual prompt for the vision-language model to infer widget-specific actions on the screen. By this means, we can validate the presence or absence of expected transitions in the implementation. Our extensive experiments on 80 mobile applications and 160 design mock-ups show that (1) GUIPilot can achieve 94.5% precision and 99.6% recall in detecting screen inconsistencies, outperforming the state-of-the-art approach, such as GVT, by 66.2% and 56.6% respectively, and (2) GUIPilot reports zero errors in detecting process inconsistencies. Furthermore, our industrial case study on applying GUIPilot on a trading mobile application shows that GUIPilot has detected nine application bugs, and all the bugs were confirmed by the original application experts.

cs.SE↗