arXiv subjects

Xu-Xiang Zhong

Publications and source records attributed to Xu-Xiang Zhong.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

PeakBench: Benchmarking Resource-Aware Tool Invocation in LLM Agents

LLM agents increasingly solve tasks by invoking multiple tools, where parallel execution is essential for low latency but difficult to manage safely. Existing agent benchmarks primarily evaluate tool selection, argument generation, and end-to-end success under mostly serial execution, largely overlooking valid parallelization and resource-constrained scheduling. This missing scheduling dimension creates a practical failure mode: serial execution is safe but slow, while resource-agnostic parallel execution is fast but prone to avoidable resource overflows. To address this gap, we introduce PeakBench, a benchmark of executable multi-tool workflows with execution-grounded dependency annotations and measured resource profiles. A central challenge in evaluating such workflows is attribution: failures and inefficiencies may arise from incorrect dependency planning, poor resource-constrained scheduling, or both. PeakBench addresses this challenge with a two-part evaluation framework that disentangles logical planning from physical scheduling, with dedicated metrics for each dimension. Using this framework, we show that strong logical planning does not reliably translate into safe or efficient execution under resource constraints. We further show that exposing resource information can reduce avoidable overflows and improve resource utilization, making PeakBench a useful testbed for diagnosing resource-aware agent behavior. Code is available at https://github.com/Czzzk/Staggering-the-Peaks.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Models via Collaborative Filtering

With the development of Large Language Models (LLMs), numerous benchmarks have been proposed to measure and compare the capabilities of different LLMs. However, evaluating LLMs is costly due to the large number of test instances and their slow inference speed. In this paper, we aim to explore how to efficiently estimate a model's real performance on a given benchmark based on its evaluation results on a small number of instances sampled from the benchmark. Inspired by Collaborative Filtering (CF) in Recommendation Systems (RS), we treat LLMs as users and test instances as items and propose a two-stage method. In the first stage, we treat instance selection as recommending products to users to choose instances that can easily distinguish model performance. In the second stage, we see performance prediction as rating prediction problem in RS to predict the target LLM's behavior on unselected instances. Experiments on multiple LLMs and datasets imply that our method can accurately estimate the target model's performance while largely reducing its inference overhead.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Model Assembly Learning with Heterogeneous Layer Weight Merging

Model merging acquires general capabilities without extra data or training by combining multiple models' parameters. Previous approaches achieve linear mode connectivity by aligning parameters into the same loss basin using permutation invariance. In this paper, we introduce Model Assembly Learning (MAL), a novel paradigm for model merging that iteratively integrates parameters from diverse models in an open-ended model zoo to enhance the base model's capabilities. Unlike previous works that require identical architectures, MAL allows the merging of heterogeneous architectures and selective parameters across layers. Specifically, the base model can incorporate parameters from different layers of multiple pre-trained models. We systematically investigate the conditions and fundamental settings of heterogeneous parameter merging, addressing all possible mismatches in layer widths between the base and target models. Furthermore, we establish key laws and provide practical guidelines for effectively implementing MAL.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

OmniEvalKit: A Modular, Lightweight Toolbox for Evaluating Large Language Model and its Omni-Extensions

The rapid advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly expanded their applications, ranging from multilingual support to domain-specific tasks and multimodal integration. In this paper, we present OmniEvalKit, a novel benchmarking toolbox designed to evaluate LLMs and their omni-extensions across multilingual, multidomain, and multimodal capabilities. Unlike existing benchmarks that often focus on a single aspect, OmniEvalKit provides a modular, lightweight, and automated evaluation system. It is structured with a modular architecture comprising a Static Builder and Dynamic Data Flow, promoting the seamless integration of new models and datasets. OmniEvalKit supports over 100 LLMs and 50 evaluation datasets, covering comprehensive evaluations across thousands of model-dataset combinations. OmniEvalKit is dedicated to creating an ultra-lightweight and fast-deployable evaluation framework, making downstream applications more convenient and versatile for the AI community.

cs.CL↗