Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Xuandong Jia

Publications and source records attributed to Xuandong Jia.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Probing cosmic anisotropy from galaxy clusters via the dipole fitting method

The cosmological principle, as the cornerstone of the standard cosmological model, requires that the universe be homogeneous and isotropic on large scales. As a fundamental assumption, it is constantly subjected to testing via various datasets and methods. In this work, we used the dipole fitting (DF) method to correct the logarithmic luminosity ($\log{L_{X}}$) of galaxy clusters, search for cosmic anisotropic signals, and establish a statistical isotropic analysis scheme. Compared to the type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), the galaxy clusters offer a superior spatial distribution, which enhances the reliability of the identified anisotropic signals. Using a sample of 313 galaxy clusters (observed by Chandra and XMM-Newton), we identified the preferred direction (l, b) = (${257.82^{\circ}}_{-52.88}^{+58.01}$, $-31.30{^{\circ}}_{-39.46}^{+35.92}$) of the cosmic anisotropy. The corresponding magnitude of anisotropy is $A$ = $-5.4 \times 10^{-4}$. Subsample reanalyses categorized by instrumentation (Chandra and XMM-Newton) and redshift (low-redshift, $z \leq 0.10$; high-redshift, $z > 0.10$) revealed more significant anisotropic signals. The XMM-Newton dataset yields a statistical significance of $1.8σ$ (Bootstrap) and $1.9σ$ (Randomized), which are considerably higher than those from the Chandra or total datasets. Meanwhile, the reanalyses also reveal that the choice of equipment and the sample redshift influence the preferred direction, anisotropic magnitude, and statistical significance obtained from galaxy clusters. Overall, the DF method can be well integrated with galaxy clusters and applied to the detection of cosmic anisotropy.

astro-ph.CO↗

Fast Radio Burst Cosmology: Hubble Tension and Dark Energy

Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are luminous, millisecond-duration extragalactic radio transients that have emerged as a powerful, complementary cosmological probe for investigating the late-time cosmic evolution, offering unique advantages over conventional probes such as Type Ia supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations, and cosmic microwave background radiation. This review systematically summarizes the cosmological applications of FRBs, focusing on their critical roles in measuring the Hubble constant ($H_0$) and constraining dark energy properties. Benefiting from the precise dispersion measure (DM) - redshift relation of localized FRBs, the integrated electron density of the intergalactic medium (IGM) along the line of sight can be tightly modeled, enabling independent and low-redshift measurements of the cosmic expansion rate. Current FRB samples consisting of localized and non-localized events provide competitive $H_0$ constraints, offering an independent method to measure $H_0$. FRBs also serve as effective tracers to constrain dark energy equation-of-state parameters. We comprehensively discuss key limiting factors for FRB cosmological precision, including uncertainties in Galactic and host galaxy electron density models, and IGM inhomogeneities. With the rapid growth of high-precision FRB surveys and localized FRB samples, FRBs are promising to provide stringent constraints on late-time cosmic acceleration, dark energy evolution and cosmic baryons.

astro-ph.CO↗

Constraints on transition redshift utilizing the latest H(z) measurements and comments on the Hubble tension

The motivation of this paper is to obtain reliable constraints of transition redshift ($z_{ztr}$) and, in combination with the evolution of the Hubble constant ($H_{0}$) that could alleviate the Hubble tension, discuss the possible origin of the tension. Utilizing the latest H(z) measurements and different methods ($Λ$CDM model, Cosmography, and Gaussian process method), we investigated the impact of methodology and dataset on $z_{ztr}$ constraints, and find that the choice of method has a greater impact on $z_{tr}$ than the observations themselves. Through a statistical analysis of the $z_{ztr}$ constraints from 2004 to 2024, we find that total $z_{tr}$ constraints (2004$-$2024) can be well described by a Gaussian function with the mean value 0.65 and the standard deviation 0.16; that is, $\bar{z}_{tr}$(all) = 0.65 $\pm$ 0.16. And we confirmed that both dataset and methodology can indeed significantly affect the final constraints. The screened $z_{tr}$ constraints with free $H_{0}$ gives a new result $\bar{z}_{tr}$(free) = 0.64 $\pm$ 0.16. Coincidentally, the $z_{tr}$ results overlap with the initial moment of $H_{0}$ evolution ($H_{0}$ value starts to deviate from the Planck result). This may suggest that the Hubble tension might be closely related to this particular period in the evolution of the Universe.

astro-ph.CO↗

Testing cosmic anisotropy with Pade approximation and Pantheon+ sample

Cosmography can be used to constrain the kinematics of universe in a model-independent way. In this work, we attempted to combine the Pad$\rm \acute{e}$ approximations with the latest Pantheon+ sample for testing cosmological principle. Based on the Pad$\rm \acute{e}$ approximations, we first gave the cosmographic constraints on the different order polynomials including third-order (Pad$\rm \acute{e}$$_{(2,1)}$), fourth-order (Pad$\rm \acute{e}$$_{(2,2)}$) and fifth-order (Pad$\rm \acute{e}$$_{(3,2)}$). Based on the Pad$\rm \acute{e}$$_{(2,1)}$ ($j_{0}$ = 1) polynomial and hemisphere comparison (HC) method, we tested the cosmological principle and found the preferred directions of cosmic anisotropy, such as (l, b) = (304.6$^{\circ}$$_{-37.4}^{+51.4}$, $-$18.7$^{\circ}$$_{-20.3}^{+14.7}$) and (311.1$^{\circ}$$_{-8.4}^{+17.4}$, $-$17.53$^{\circ}$$_{-7.7}^{+7.8}$) for $q_{0}$ and $H_{0}$, respectively. These two directions are consistent with each other in $1σ$ confidence level, but the corresponding results of statistical isotropy analyses including Isotropy and Isotropy with real positions (RP) are quite different. The statistical significance of $H_{0}$ are stronger than that of $q_{0}$, i.e., 4.75$σ$ and 4.39$σ$ for the Isotropy and Isotropy with RP respectively. Reanalysis with fixed $q_{0} = -0.55$ (corresponds to $Ω_{m}$ = 0.30) gives similar results. Overall, our model-independent results provide clear indications for a possible cosmic anisotropy, which must be taken seriously. Further test is needed to better understand this signal.

astro-ph.CO↗