Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Xuding Zhu

Publications and source records attributed to Xuding Zhu.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Multiple DP-coloring of planar graphs without 3-cycles and normally adjacent 4-cycles

The concept of DP-coloring of a graph is a generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. Multiple DP-coloring of graphs, as a generalization of multiple list coloring, was first studied by Bernshteyn, Kostochka and Zhu in 2019. This paper proves that planar graphs without 3-cycles and normally adjacent 4-cycles are $(7m, 2m)$-DP-colorable for every integer $m$. As a consequence, the strong fractional choice number of any planar graph without 3-cycles and normally adjacent 4-cycles is at most $7/2$.

math.CO↗

The strong fractional choice number and the strong fractional paint number of graphs

This paper studies the strong fractional choice number $ch^s_f(G)$ and the strong fractional paint number $χ^s_{f,P}(G)$ of a graph $G$. We prove that these parameters of any finite graph are rational numbers. On the other hand, for any positive integers $p,q$ satisfying $2 \le \frac{2p}{2q+1} \leq \lfloor\frac{p}{q}\rfloor$, there exists a graph $G$ with $ch^s_f(G) = χ^s_{f,P}(G) = \frac{p}{q}$. The relationship between $χ^s_{f,P}(G)$ and $ch^s_f(G)$ is explored. We prove that the gap $χ^s_{f,P}(G)-ch^s_f(G)$ can be arbitrarily large. The strong fractional choice number of a family $\mathcal{G}$ of graphs is the supremum of the strong fractional choice number of graphs in $\mathcal{G}$. Let $\mathcal{P}$ denote the class of planar graphs and $\mathcal{P}_{k_1,\ldots, k_q}$ denote the class of planar graphs without $k_i$-cycles for $i=1,\ldots, q$. We prove that $3 + \frac{1}{2} \leq ch^s_f(\mathcal{P}_{ 4}) \leq 4$, $ch^s_f(\mathcal{P}_{ k})=4$ for $k \in \{5,6\}$, $3 +\frac{1}{12} \leq ch^s_f(\mathcal{P}_{ 4,5}) \leq 4$ and $ch^s_f(\mathcal{P}) \ge 4+\frac 13$. The last result improves the lower bound $4+\frac 29$ in [X. Zhu, multiple list colouring of planar graphs, Journal of Combin. Th. Ser. B,122(2017),794-799].

math.CO↗

Girth and $λ$-choosability of graphs

Assume $ k $ is a positive integer, $ λ=\{k_1,k_2,...,k_q\} $ is a partition of $ k $ and $ G $ is a graph. A $λ$-assignment of $ G $ is a $ k $-assignment $ L $ of $ G $ such that the colour set $ \bigcup_{v\in V(G)} L(v) $ can be partitioned into $ q $ subsets $ C_1\cup C_2\cup\cdots\cup C_q $ and for each vertex $ v $ of $ G $, $ |L(v)\cap C_i|=k_i $. We say $ G $ is $λ$-choosable if for each $λ$-assignment $ L $ of $ G $, $ G $ is $ L $-colourable. In particular, if $ λ=\{k\} $, then $λ$-choosable is the same as $ k $-choosable, if $ λ=\{1, 1,...,1\} $, then $λ$-choosable is equivalent to $ k $-colourable. For the other partitions of $ k $ sandwiched between $ \{k\} $ and $ \{1, 1,...,1\} $ in terms of refinements, $λ$-choosability reveals a complex hierarchy of colourability of graphs. Assume $λ=\{k_1, \ldots, k_q\} $ is a partition of $ k $ and $λ' $ is a partition of $ k'\ge k $. We write $ λ\le λ' $ if there is a partition $λ''=\{k''_1, \ldots, k''_q\}$ of $k'$ with $k''_i \ge k_i$ for $i=1,2,\ldots, q$ and $λ'$ is a refinement of $λ''$. It follows from the definition that if $ λ\le λ' $, then every $λ$-choosable graph is $λ'$-choosable. It was proved in [X. Zhu, A refinement of choosability of graphs, J. Combin. Theory, Ser. B 141 (2020) 143 - 164] that the converse is also true. This paper strengthens this result and proves that for any $ λ\not\le λ' $, for any integer $g$, there exists a graph of girth at least $g$ which is $λ$-choosable but not $λ'$-choosable.

math.CO↗

Dense Eulerian graphs are $(1, 3)$-choosable

A graph $G$ is total weight $(k,k')$-choosable if for any total list assignment $L$ which assigns to each vertex $v$ a set $L(v)$ of $k$ real numbers, and each edge $e$ a set $L(e)$ of $k'$ real numbers, there is a proper total $L$-weighting, i.e., a mapping $f: V(G) \cup E(G) \to \mathbb{R}$ such that for each $z \in V(G) \cup E(G)$, $f(z) \in L(z)$, and for each edge $uv$ of $G$, $\sum_{e \in E(u)}f(e)+f(u) \ne \sum_{e \in E(v)}f(e) + f(v)$. This paper proves that if $G$ decomposes into complete graphs of odd order, then $G$ is total weight $(1,3)$-choosable. As a consequence, every Eulerian graph $G$ of large order and with minimum degree at least $0.91|V(G)|$ is total weight $(1,3)$-choosable. We also prove that any graph $G$ with minimum degree at least $0.999|V(G)|$ is total weight $(1,4)$-choosable.

math.CO↗

3-degenerate induced subgraph of a planar graph

A graph $G$ is $d$-degenerate if every non-null subgraph of $G$ has a vertex of degree at most $d$. We prove that every $n$-vertex planar graph has a $3$-degenerate induced subgraph of order at least $3n/4$.

math.CO↗

The strong fractional choice number of $3$-choice critical graphs

A graph $G$ is called $3$-choice critical if $G$ is not $2$-choosable but any proper subgraph is $2$-choosable. A graph $G$ is strongly fractional $r$-choosable if $G$ is $(a,b)$-choosable for all positive integers $a,b$ for which $a/b \ge r$. The strong fractional choice number of $G$ is $ch_f^s(G) = \inf \{r: G $ is strongly fractional $r$-choosable$\}$. This paper determines the strong fractional choice number of all $3$-choice critical graphs.

math.CO↗

Circular chromatic number of signed graphs

A signed graph is a pair $(G, σ)$, where $G$ is a graph and $σ: E(G) \to \{+, -\}$ is a signature which assigns to each edge of $G$ a sign. Various notions of coloring of signed graphs have been studied. In this paper, we extend circular coloring of graphs to signed graphs. Given a signed graph $(G, σ)$ a circular $r$-coloring of $(G, σ)$ is an assignment $ψ$ of points of a circle of circumference $r$ to the vertices of $G$ such that for every edge $e=uv$ of $G$, if $σ(e)=+$, then $ψ(u)$ and $ψ(v)$ have distance at least $1$, and if $σ(e)=-$, then $ψ(v)$ and the antipodal of $ψ(u)$ have distance at least $1$. The circular chromatic number $χ_c(G, σ)$ of a signed graph $(G, σ)$ is the infimum of those $r$ for which $(G, σ)$ admits a circular $r$-coloring. For a graph $G$, we define the signed circular chromatic number of $G$ to be $\max\{χ_c(G, σ): σ\text{ is a signature of $G$}\}$. We study basic properties of circular coloring of signed graphs and develop tools for calculating $χ_c(G, σ)$. We explore the relation between the circular chromatic number and the signed circular chromatic number of graphs, and present bounds for the signed circular chromatic number of some families of graphs. In particular, we determine the supremum of the signed circular chromatic number of $k$-chromatic graphs of large girth, of simple bipartite planar graphs, $d$-degenerate graphs, simple outerplanar graphs and series-parallel graphs. We construct a signed planar simple graph whose circular chromatic number is $4+\frac{2}{3}$. This is based and improves on a signed graph built by Kardos and Narboni as a counterexample to a conjecture of Máčajová, Raspaud, and Škoviera.

math.CO↗

Decomposing planar graphs into graphs with degree restrictions

Given a graph $G$, a decomposition of $G$ is a partition of its edges. A graph is $(d, h)$-decomposable if its edge set can be partitioned into a $d$-degenerate graph and a graph with maximum degree at most $h$. For $d \le 4$, we are interested in the minimum integer $h_d$ such that every planar graph is $(d,h_d)$-decomposable. It was known that $h_3 \le 4$, $h_2\le 8$, and $h_1 = \infty$. This paper proves that $h_4=1, h_3=2$, and $4 \le h_2 \le 6$.

math.CO↗

Relatively small counterexamples to Hedetniemi's conjecture

Hedetniemi conjectured in 1966 that $χ(G \times H) = \min\{χ(G), χ(H)\}$ for all graphs $G$ and $H$. Here $G\times H$ is the graph with vertex set $ V(G)\times V(H)$ defined by putting $(x,y)$ and $(x',y')$ adjacent if and only if $xx'\in E(G)$ and $yy'\in E(H)$. This conjecture received a lot of attention in the past half century. Recently, Shitov refuted this conjecture. Let $p$ be the minimum number of vertices in a graph of odd girth $7$ and fractional chromatic number greater than $3+4/(p-1)$. Shitov's proof shows that Hedetniemi's conjecture fails for some graphs with chromatic number about $p^22^{p+1} $ and with about $(p^22^{p+1})^{p^32^{p-1}} $ vertices. In this paper, we show that the conjecture fails already for some graphs $G$ and $H$ with chromatic number $3\lceil \frac {p+1}2 \rceil $ and with $p \lceil (p-1)/2 \rceil$ and $3 \lceil \frac {p+1}2 \rceil (p+1)-p$ vertices, respectively. The currently known upper bound for $p$ is $148$. Thus Hedetniemi's conjecture fails for some graphs $G$ and $H$ with chromatic number $225$, and with $10,952$ and $33,377$ vertices, respectively.

math.CO↗

Multiple list colouring of $3$-choice critical graphs

A graph $G$ is called $3$-choice critical if $G$ is not $2$-choosable but any proper subgraph is $2$-choosable. A characterization of $3$-choice critical graphs was given by Voigt in [On list Colourings and Choosability of Graphs, Habilitationsschrift, Tu Ilmenau(1998)]. Voigt conjectured that if $G$ is a bipartite $3$-choice critical graph, then $G$ is $(4m, 2m)$-choosable for every integer $m$. This conjecture was disproved by Meng, Puleo and Zhu in [On (4, 2)-Choosable Graphs, Journal of Graph Theory 85(2):412-428(2017)]. They showed that if $G=Θ_{r,s,t}$ where $r,s,t$ have the same parity and $\min\{r,s,t\} \ge 3$, or $G=Θ_{2,2,2,2p}$ with $p \ge 2$, then $G$ is bipartite $3$-choice critical, but not $(4,2)$-choosable. On the other hand, all the other bipartite 3-choice critical graphs are $(4,2)$-choosable. This paper strengthens the result of Meng, Puleo and Zhu and shows that all the other bipartite $3$-choice critical graphs are $(4m,2m)$-choosable for every integer $m$.

math.CO↗

A Connected Version of the Graph Coloring Game

The graph coloring game is a two-player game in which, given a graph G and a set of k colors, the two players, Alice and Bob, take turns coloring properly an uncolored vertex of G, Alice having the first move. Alice wins the game if and only if all the vertices of G are eventually colored. The game chromatic number of a graph G is then defined as the smallest integer k for which Alice has a winning strategy when playing the graph coloring game on G with k colors. In this paper, we introduce and study a new version of the graph coloring game by requiring that, after each player's turn, the subgraph induced by the set of colored vertices is connected. The connected game chromatic number of a graph G is then the smallest integer k for which Alice has a winning strategy when playing the connected graph coloring game on G with k colors. We prove that the connected game chromatic number of every outerplanar graph is at most 5 and that there exist outerplanar graphs with connected game chromatic number 4. Moreover, we prove that for every integer k $\ge$ 3, there exist bipartite graphs on which Bob wins the connected coloring game with k colors, while Alice wins the connected coloring game with two colors on every bipartite graph.

cs.DM↗

Clustering powers of sparse graphs

We prove that if $G$ is a sparse graph --- it belongs to a fixed class of bounded expansion $\mathcal{C}$ --- and $d\in \mathbb{N}$ is fixed, then the $d$th power of $G$ can be partitioned into cliques so that contracting each of these clique to a single vertex again yields a sparse graph. This result has several graph-theoretic and algorithmic consequences for powers of sparse graphs, including bounds on their subchromatic number and efficient approximation algorithms for the chromatic number and the clique number.

cs.DM↗

Generalized list colouring of graphs

This paper disproves a conjecture of Wang, Wu, Yan and Xie, and answers in negative a question in Dvorak, Pekarek and Sereni. In return, we pose five open problems.

math.CO↗

On Hedetniemi's conjecture and the Poljak-Rodl function

Hedetniemi conjectured in 1966 that $χ(G \times H) = \min\{χ(G), χ(H)\}$ for any graphs G and H. Here $G\times H$ is the graph with vertex set $ V(G)\times V(H)$ defined by putting $(x,y)$ and $(x',y')$ adjacent if and only if $xx'\in E(G)$ and $yy'\in V(H)$. This conjecture received a lot of attention in the past half century. It was disproved recently by Shitov. The Poljak-Rödl function is defined as $f(n) = \min\{χ(G \times H): χ(G)=χ(H)=n\}$. Hedetniemi's conjecture is equivalent to saying $f(n)=n$ for all integer $n$. Shitov's result shows that $f(n)<n$ when $n$ is sufficiently large. Using Shitov's result, Tardif and Zhu showed that $f(n) \le n - (\log n)^{1/4}$ for sufficiently large $n$. Using Shitov's method, He--Wigderson showed that for $ε\approx 10^{-9}$ and $n$ sufficiently large, $f(n) \le (1-ε)n$. In this note we prove that a slight modification of the proof in the paper of Zhu and Tardif shows that $f(n) \le (\frac 12 + o(1))n$ for sufficiently large $n$. On the other hand, it is unknown whether $f(n)$ is bounded by a constant. However, we do know that if $f(n)$ is bounded by a constant, then the smallest such constant is at most $9$. This lecture note gives self-contained proofs of the above mentioned results.

math.CO↗

Strong fractional choice number of series-parallel graphs

The strong fractional choice number of a graph $G$ is the infimum of those real numbers $r$ such that $G$ is $(\lceil rm \rceil, m)$-choosable for every positive integer $m$. The strong fractional choice number of a family ${\cal G}$ of graphs is the supremum of the strong fractional choice number of graphs in ${\cal G}$. We denote by ${\cal{Q}}_k$ the class of series-parallel graphs with girth at least $k$. This paper proves that for $k=4q-1, 4q,4q+1, 4q+2$, the strong fractional number of ${\cal{Q}}_k$ is exactly $2+ \frac{1}{q}$.

math.CO↗

Chromatic $λ$-choosable and $λ$-paintable graphs

Let $ϕ(k)$ be the minimum number of vertices in a non-$k$-choosable $k$-chromatic graph. The Ohba conjecture, confirmed by Noel, Reed and Wu, asserts that $ϕ(k) \ge 2k+2$. This bound is tight if $k$ is even. If $k$ is odd, then it is known that $ϕ(k) \le 2k+3$ and it is conjectured by Noel that $ϕ(k) = 2k+3$. For a multi-set $λ=\{k_1,k_2, \ldots, k_q\}$ of positive integers, let $k_λ = \sum_{i=1}^q k_i$. A $λ$-list assignment of $G$ is a $k_λ$-list assignment $L$ for which the colour set $\cup_{v \in V(G)}L(v)$ can be partitioned into the disjoint union $C_1 \cup C_2 \cup \ldots \cup C_q$ of $q$ sets so that for each $i$ and each vertex $v$ of $G$, $|L(v) \cap C_i| \ge k_i$. We say $G$ is $λ$-choosable if $G$ is $L$-colourable for any $λ$-list assignment $L$ of $G$. Let $ϕ(λ)$ be the minimum number of vertices in a non-$λ$-choosable $k_λ$-chromatic graph. Let $1_λ$ be the multiplicity of $1$ in $λ$, and let $o_λ$ be the number of elements in $λ$ that are odd integers. We prove that if $1_λ \ne k_λ$, then $2k_λ+1_λ+2 \leqslant ϕ(λ) \leqslant 2k_λ+ o_λ+2$. In particular, if $1_λ=o_λ=t$, i.e. $λ$ contains no odd integer greater than $1$, then $ϕ(λ) = 2k_λ+t+2$. We also prove that $ϕ(λ) \leqslant 2k_λ+5 1_λ+3$. In particular, if $1_λ=0$, then $2k_λ+2 \leqslant ϕ(λ) \leqslant 2k_λ+3$.

math.CO↗