arXiv subjects

Xueliang Li

Publications and source records attributed to Xueliang Li.

At least 199 records · Page 11Linked to original sources

arXiv2011

The minimal size of a graph with generalized connectivity $κ_3 = 2$

Let $G$ be a nontrivial connected graph of order $n$ and $k$ an integer with $2\leq k\leq n$. For a set $S$ of $k$ vertices of $G$, let $κ(S)$ denote the maximum number $\ell$ of edge-disjoint trees $T_1,T_2,...,T_\ell$ in $G$ such that $V(T_i)\cap V(T_j)=S$ for every pair $i,j$ of distinct integers with $1\leq i,j\leq \ell$. Chartrand et al. generalized the concept of connectivity as follows: The $k$-$connectivity$, denoted by $κ_k(G)$, of $G$ is defined by $κ_k(G)=$min$\{κ(S)\}$, where the minimum is taken over all $k$-subsets $S$ of $V(G)$. Thus $κ_2(G)=κ(G)$, where $κ(G)$ is the connectivity of $G$. This paper mainly focuses on the minimal number of edges of a graph $G$ with $κ_{3}(G)= 2$. For a graph $G$ of order $v(G)$ and size $e(G)$ with $κ_{3}(G)= 2$, we obtain that $e(G)\geq 6/5v(G)$, and the lower bound is sharp by showing a class of examples attaining the lower bound.

math.CO↗

arXiv2011

Sharp upper bound for the rainbow connection numbers of 2-connected graphs

An edge-colored graph $G$, where adjacent edges may be colored the same, is rainbow connected if any two vertices of $G$ are connected by a path whose edges have distinct colors. The rainbow connection number $rc(G)$ of a connected graph $G$ is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ rainbow connected. In this paper, we give a sharp upper bound that $rc(G)\leq\lceil\frac{n}{2}\rceil$ for any 2-connected graph $G$ of order $n$, which improves the results of Caro et al. to best possible.

math.CO↗

arXiv2011

Asymptotic value of the minimal size of a graph with rainbow connection number 2

A path in an edge (vertex)-colored graph $G$, where adjacent edges (vertices) may have the same color, is called a rainbow path if no pair of edges (internal vertices) of the path are colored the same. The rainbow (vertex) connection number $rc(G)$ ($rvc(G)$) of $G$ is the minimum integer $i$ for which there exists an $i$-edge (vertex)-coloring of $G$ such that every two distinct vertices of $G$ are connected by a rainbow path. Denote by $\mathcal{G}_d(n)$ ($\mathcal{G'}_d(n)$) the set of all graphs of order $n$ with rainbow (vertex) connection number $d$, and define $e_d(n)=\min\{e(G)\,|\, G\in \mathcal{G}_d(n)\}$ ($e_d'(n)=\min\{e(G)\,|\, G\in \mathcal{G'}_d(n)\}$), where $e(G)$ denotes the number of edges in $G$. In this paper, we investigate the bounds of $e_2(n)$ and get the exact asymptotic value. i.e., $\displaystyle \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\frac{e_2(n)}{n\log_2 n}=1$. Meanwhile, we obtain $e'_d(n)=n-1$ for $d\geq 2$, and the equality holds if and only if $G$ is such a graph such that deleting all leaves of $G$ results in a tree of order $d$.

math.CO↗

arXiv2011

Rainbow connection number, bridges and radius

Let $G$ be a connected graph. The notion \emph{the rainbow connection number $rc(G)$} of a graph $G$ was introduced recently by Chartrand et al. Basavaraju et al. showed that for every bridgeless graph $G$ with radius $r$, $rc(G)\leq r(r+2)$, and the bound is tight. In this paper, we prove that if $G$ is a connected graph, and $D^{k}$ is a connected $k$-step dominating set of $G$, then $G$ has a connected $(k-1)$-step dominating set $D^{k-1}\supset D^{k}$ such that $rc(G[D^{k-1}])\leq rc(G[D^{k}])+\max\{2k+1,b_k\}$, where $b_k$ is the number of bridges in $ E(D^{k}, N(D^{k}))$. Furthermore, for a connected graph $G$ with radius $r$, let $u$ be the center of $G$, and $D^{r}=\{u\}$. Then $G$ has $r-1$ connected dominating sets $ D^{r-1}, D^{r-2},..., D^{1}$ satisfying $D^{r}\subset D^{r-1}\subset D^{r-2} ...\subset D^{1}\subset D^{0}=V(G)$, and $rc(G)\leq \sum_{i=1}^{r}\max\{2i+1,b_i\}$, where $b_i$ is the number of bridges in $ E(D^{i}, N(D^{i})), 1\leq i \leq r$. From the result, we can get that if for all $1\leq i\leq r, b_i\leq 2i+1$, then $rc(G)\leq \sum_{i=1}^{r}(2i+1)= r(r+2)$; if for all $1\leq i\leq r, b_i> 2i+1$, then $rc(G)= \sum_{i=1}^{r}b_i$, the number of bridges of $G$. This generalizes the result of Basavaraju et al.

math.CO↗

arXiv2011

The generalized 3-connectivity of Cartesian product graphs

The generalized connectivity of a graph, which was introduced recently by Chartrand et al., is a generalization of the concept of vertex connectivity. Let $S$ be a nonempty set of vertices of $G$, a collection $\{T_1,T_2,...,T_r\}$ of trees in $G$ is said to be internally disjoint trees connecting $S$ if $E(T_i)\cap E(T_j)=\emptyset$ and $V(T_i)\cap V(T_j)=S$ for any pair of distinct integers $i,j$, where $1\leq i,j\leq r$. For an integer $k$ with $2\leq k\leq n$, the $k$-connectivity $κ_k(G)$ of $G$ is the greatest positive integer $r$ for which $G$ contains at least $r$ internally disjoint trees connecting $S$ for any set $S$ of $k$ vertices of $G$. Obviously, $κ_2(G)=κ(G)$ is the connectivity of $G$. Sabidussi showed that $κ(G\Box H) \geq κ(G)+κ(H)$ for any two connected graphs $G$ and $H$. In this paper, we first study the 3-connectivity of the Cartesian product of a graph $G$ and a tree $T$, and show that $(i)$ if $κ_3(G)=κ(G)\geq 1$, then $κ_3(G\Box T)\geq κ_3(G)$; $(ii)$ if $1\leq κ_3(G)< κ(G)$, then $κ_3(G\Box T)\geq κ_3(G)+1$. Furthermore, for any two connected graphs $G$ and $H$ with $κ_3(G)\geqκ_3(H)$, if $κ(G)>κ_3(G)$, then $κ_3(G\Box H)\geq κ_3(G)+κ_3(H)$; if $κ(G)=κ_3(G)$, then $κ_3(G\Box H)\geq κ_3(G)+κ_3(H)-1$. Our result could be seen as a generalization of Sabidussi's result. Moreover, all the bounds are sharp.

math.CO↗

arXiv2011

Bicyclic graphs with maximal revised Szeged index

The revised Szeged index $Sz^*(G)$ is defined as $Sz^*(G)=\sum_{e=uv \in E}(n_u(e)+ n_0(e)/2)(n_v(e)+ n_0(e)/2),$ where $n_u(e)$ and $n_v(e)$ are, respectively, the number of vertices of $G$ lying closer to vertex $u$ than to vertex $v$ and the number of vertices of $G$ lying closer to vertex $v$ than to vertex $u$, and $n_0(e)$ is the number of vertices equidistant to $u$ and $v$. Hansen used the AutoGraphiX and made the following conjecture about the revised Szeged index for a connected bicyclic graph $G$ of order $n \geq 6$: $$ Sz^*(G)\leq \{{array}{ll} (n^3+n^2-n-1)/4,& {if $n$ is odd}, (n^3+n^2-n)/4, & {if $n$ is even}. {array}. $$ with equality if and only if $G$ is the graph obtained from the cycle $C_{n-1}$ by duplicating a single vertex. This paper is to give a confirmative proof to this conjecture.

math.CO↗

arXiv2011

On the maximal energy tree with two maximum degree vertices

For a simple graph $G$, the energy $E(G)$ is defined as the sum of the absolute values of all eigenvalues of its adjacent matrix. For $Δ\geq 3$ and $t\geq 3$, denote by $T_a(Δ,t)$ (or simply $T_a$) the tree formed from a path $P_t$ on $t$ vertices by attaching $Δ-1$ $P_2$'s on each end of the path $P_t$, and $T_b(Δ, t)$ (or simply $T_b$) the tree formed from $P_{t+2}$ by attaching $Δ-1$ $P_2$'s on an end of the $P_{t+2}$ and $Δ-2$ $P_2$'s on the vertex next to the end. In [X. Li, X. Yao, J. Zhang and I. Gutman, Maximum energy trees with two maximum degree vertices, J. Math. Chem. 45(2009), 962--973], Li et al. proved that among trees of order $n$ with two vertices of maximum degree $Δ$, the maximal energy tree is either the graph $T_a$ or the graph $T_b$, where $t=n+4-4Δ\geq 3$. However, they could not determine which one of $T_a$ and $T_b$ is the maximal energy tree. This is because the quasi-order method is invalid for comparing their energies. In this paper, we use a new method to determine the maximal energy tree. It turns out that things are more complicated. We prove that the maximal energy tree is $T_b$ for $Δ\geq 7$ and any $t\geq 3$, while the maximal energy tree is $T_a$ for $Δ=3$ and any $t\geq 3$. Moreover, for $Δ=4$, the maximal energy tree is $T_a$ for all $t\geq 3$ but $t=4$, for which $T_b$ is the maximal energy tree. For $Δ=5$, the maximal energy tree is $T_b$ for all $t\geq 3$ but $t$ is odd and $3\leq t\leq 89$, for which $T_a$ is the maximal energy tree. For $Δ=6$, the maximal energy tree is $T_b$ for all $t\geq 3$ but $t=3,5,7$, for which $T_a$ is the maximal energy tree. One can see that for most $Δ$, $T_b$ is the maximal energy tree, $Δ=5$ is a turning point, and $Δ=3$ and 4 are exceptional cases.

math.CO↗

arXiv2011

Two rainbow connection numbers and the parameter $σ_k(G)$

The rainbow connection number $rc(G)$ and the rainbow vertex-connection number $rvc(G)$ of a graph $G$ were introduced by Chartrand et al. and Krivelevich and Yuster, respectively. Good upper bounds in terms of minimum degree $δ$ were reported by Chandran et al., Krivelevich and Yuster, and Li and Shi. However, if a graph has a small minimum degree $δ$ and a large number of vertices $n$, these upper bounds are very large, linear in $n$. Hence, one may think to look for a good parameter to replace $δ$ and decrease the upper bounds significantly. Such a natural parameter is $σ_k$. In this paper, for the rainbow connection number we prove that if $G$ is a connected graph of order $n$ with $k$ independent vertices, then $rc(G)\leq 3k\frac{n-2}{σ_k+k}+6k-4$. For the rainbow vertex-connection number, we prove that $rvc(G)\leq \frac{(4k+2k^{2})n}{σ_k+k}+5k $ if $σ_k\leq 7k$ and $σ_k\geq 8k$, and $rvc(G)\leq \frac{(\frac{38k}{9}+2k^{2})n}{σ_k+k}+5k$ if $7k<σ_k< 8k$. Examples are given showing that our bounds are much better than the existing ones, i.e., for the examples $δ$ is very small but $σ_k$ is very large, and the bounds are $rc(G)< 9k-3$ and $rvc(G)\leq 9k+2k^{2}$ or $rvc(G)\leq\frac{83k}{9}+2k^{2}$, which imply that both $rc(G)$ and $rvc(G)$ can be upper bounded by constants from our upper bounds, but linear in $n$ from the existing ones.

math.CO↗

arXiv2011

Nordhaus-Gaddum-type theorem for the rainbow vertex-connection number of a graph

A vertex-colored graph $G$ is rainbow vertex-connected if any pair of distinct vertices are connected by a path whose internal vertices have distinct colors. The rainbow vertex-connection number of $G$, denoted by $rvc(G)$, is the minimum number of colors that are needed to make $G$ rainbow vertex-connected. In this paper we give a Nordhaus-Gaddum-type result of the rainbow vertex-connection number. We prove that when $G$ and $\bar{G}$ are both connected, then $2\leq rvc(G)+rvc(\bar{G})\leq n-1$. Examples are given to show that both the upper bound and the lower bound are best possible for all $n\geq 5$.

math.CO↗

arXiv2011

Rainbow connection of graphs with diameter 2

A path in an edge-colored graph $G$, where adjacent edges may have the same color, is called a rainbow path if no two edges of the path are colored the same. The rainbow connection number $rc(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum integer $i$ for which there exists an $i$-edge-coloring of $G$ such that every two distinct vertices of $G$ are connected by a rainbow path. It is known that for a graph $G$ with diameter 2, to determine $rc(G)$ is NP-hard. So, it is interesting to know the best upper bound of $rc(G)$ for such a graph $G$. In this paper, we show that $rc(G)\leq 5$ if $G$ is a bridgeless graph with diameter 2, and that $rc(G)\leq k+2$ if $G$ is a connected graph of diameter 2 with $k$ bridges, where $k\geq 1$.

math.CO↗

arXiv2011

Complete solution to a conjecture on the maximal energy of unicyclic graphs

For a given simple graph $G$, the energy of $G$, denoted by $E(G)$, is defined as the sum of the absolute values of all eigenvalues of its adjacency matrix. Let $P_n^{\ell}$ be the unicyclic graph obtained by connecting a vertex of $C_\ell$ with a leaf of $P_{n-\ell}$\,. In [G. Caporossi, D. Cvetković, I. Gutman, P. Hansen, Variable neighborhood search for extremal graphs. 2. Finding graphs with extremal energy, {\it J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.} {\bf 39}(1999) 984--996], Caporossi et al. conjectured that the unicyclic graph with maximal energy is $C_n$ if $n\leq 7$ and $n=9,10,11,13,15$\,, and $P_n^6$ for all other values of $n$. In this paper, by employing the Coulson integral formula and some knowledge of real analysis, especially by using certain combinatorial technique, we completely solve this conjecture. However, it turns out that for $n=4$ the conjecture is not true, and $P_4^3$ should be the unicyclic graph with maximal energy.

math.CO↗

arXiv2011

Solution to a conjecture on the maximal energy of bipartite bicyclic graphs

The energy of a simple graph $G$, denoted by $E(G)$, is defined as the sum of the absolute values of all eigenvalues of its adjacency matrix. Let $C_n$ denote the cycle of order $n$ and $P^{6,6}_n$ the graph obtained from joining two cycles $C_6$ by a path $P_{n-12}$ with its two leaves. Let $\mathscr{B}_n$ denote the class of all bipartite bicyclic graphs but not the graph $R_{a,b}$, which is obtained from joining two cycles $C_a$ and $C_b$ ($a, b\geq 10$ and $a \equiv b\equiv 2\, (\,\textmd{mod}\, 4)$) by an edge. In [I. Gutman, D. Vidović, Quest for molecular graphs with maximal energy: a computer experiment, {\it J. Chem. Inf. Sci.} {\bf41}(2001), 1002--1005], Gutman and Vidović conjectured that the bicyclic graph with maximal energy is $P^{6,6}_n$, for $n=14$ and $n\geq 16$. In [X. Li, J. Zhang, On bicyclic graphs with maximal energy, {\it Linear Algebra Appl.} {\bf427}(2007), 87--98], Li and Zhang showed that the conjecture is true for graphs in the class $\mathscr{B}_n$. However, they could not determine which of the two graphs $R_{a,b}$ and $P^{6,6}_n$ has the maximal value of energy. In [B. Furtula, S. Radenković, I. Gutman, Bicyclic molecular graphs with the greatest energy, {\it J. Serb. Chem. Soc.} {\bf73(4)}(2008), 431--433], numerical computations up to $a+b=50$ were reported, supporting the conjecture. So, it is still necessary to have a mathematical proof to this conjecture. This paper is to show that the energy of $P^{6,6}_n$ is larger than that of $R_{a,b}$, which proves the conjecture for bipartite bicyclic graphs. For non-bipartite bicyclic graphs, the conjecture is still open.

math.CO↗

arXiv2011

Rainbow connections of graphs -- A survey

The concept of rainbow connection was introduced by Chartrand et al. in 2008. It is fairly interesting and recently quite a lot papers have been published about it. In this survey we attempt to bring together most of the results and papers that dealt with it. We begin with an introduction, and then try to organize the work into five categories, including (strong) rainbow connection number, rainbow $k$-connectivity, $k$-rainbow index, rainbow vertex-connection number, algorithms and computational complexity. This survey also contains some conjectures, open problems or questions.

math.CO↗

arXiv2011

Upper bounds involving parameter $σ_2$ for the rainbow connection

For a graph $G$, we define $σ_2(G)=min \{d(u)+d(v)| u,v\in V(G), uv\not\in E(G)\}$, or simply denoted by $σ_2$. A edge-colored graph is rainbow edge-connected if any two vertices are connected by a path whose edges have distinct colors, which was introduced by Chartrand et al. The rainbow connection of a connected graph $G$, denoted by $rc(G)$, is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ rainbow edge-connected. We prove that if $G$ is a connected graph of order $n$, then $rc(G)\leq 6\frac{n-2}{σ_2+2}+7$. Moreover, the bound is seen to be tight up to additive factors by a construction mentioned by Caro et al. A vertex-colored graph is rainbow vertex-connected if any two vertices are connected by a path whose internal vertices have distinct colors, which was recently introduced by Krivelevich and Yuster. The rainbow vertex-connection of a connected graph $G$, denoted by $rvc(G)$, is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ rainbow vertex-connected. We prove that if $G$ is a connected graph of order $n$, then $rvc(G)\leq 8\frac{n-2}{σ_2+2}+10 $ for $2\leq σ_2\leq 6, σ_2\geq 28 $, while for $ 7 \leq σ_2\leq 8, 16\leq σ_2\leq 27$, $ rvc(G)\leq \frac{10n-16}{σ_2+2}+10$, and for $9 \leq σ_2\leq 15, rvc(G)\leq \frac{10n-16}{σ_2+2}+A(σ_2)$ where $ A(σ_2)= 63,41,27,20,16,13,11,$ respectively.

math.CO↗

arXiv2011

The complexity of determining the rainbow vertex-connection of graphs

A vertex-colored graph is {\it rainbow vertex-connected} if any two vertices are connected by a path whose internal vertices have distinct colors, which was introduced by Krivelevich and Yuster. The {\it rainbow vertex-connection} of a connected graph $G$, denoted by $rvc(G)$, is the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ rainbow vertex-connected. In this paper, we study the computational complexity of vertex-rainbow connection of graphs and prove that computing $rvc(G)$ is NP-Hard. Moreover, we show that it is already NP-Complete to decide whether $rvc(G)=2$. We also prove that the following problem is NP-Complete: given a vertex-colored graph $G$, check whether the given coloring makes $G$ rainbow vertex-connected.

math.CO↗

arXiv2010

The generalized connectivity of complete bipartite graphs

Let $G$ be a nontrivial connected graph of order $n$, and $k$ an integer with $2\leq k\leq n$. For a set $S$ of $k$ vertices of $G$, let $κ(S)$ denote the maximum number $\ell$ of edge-disjoint trees $T_1,T_2,...,T_\ell$ in $G$ such that $V(T_i)\cap V(T_j)=S$ for every pair $i,j$ of distinct integers with $1\leq i,j\leq \ell$. Chartrand et al. generalized the concept of connectivity as follows: The $k$-$connectivity$, denoted by $κ_k(G)$, of $G$ is defined by $κ_k(G)=$min$\{κ(S)\}$, where the minimum is taken over all $k$-subsets $S$ of $V(G)$. Thus $κ_2(G)=κ(G)$, where $κ(G)$ is the connectivity of $G$. Moreover, $κ_{n}(G)$ is the maximum number of edge-disjoint spanning trees of $G$. This paper mainly focus on the $k$-connectivity of complete bipartite graphs $K_{a,b}$. First, we obtain the number of edge-disjoint spanning trees of $K_{a,b}$, which is $\lfloor\frac{ab}{a+b-1}\rfloor$, and specifically give the $\lfloor\frac{ab}{a+b-1}\rfloor$ edge-disjoint spanning trees. Then based on this result, we get the $k$-connectivity of $K_{a,b}$ for all $2\leq k \leq a+b$. Namely, if $k>b-a+2$ and $a-b+k$ is odd then $κ_{k}(K_{a,b})=\frac{a+b-k+1}{2}+\lfloor\frac{(a-b+k-1)(b-a+k-1)}{4(k-1)}\rfloor,$ if $k>b-a+2$ and $a-b+k$ is even then $κ_{k}(K_{a,b})=\frac{a+b-k}{2}+\lfloor\frac{(a-b+k)(b-a+k)}{4(k-1)}\rfloor,$ and if $k\leq b-a+2$ then $κ_{k}(K_{a,b})=a. $

math.CO↗

arXiv2010

Rainbow connection numbers of complementary graphs

A path in an edge-colored graph, where adjacent edges may be colored the same, is a rainbow path if no two edges of it are colored the same. A nontrivial connected graph $G$ is rainbow connected if there is a rainbow path connecting any two vertices, and the rainbow connection number of $G$, denoted by $rc(G)$, is the minimum number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ rainbow connected. In this paper, we provide a new approach to investigate the rainbow connection number of a graph $G$ according to some constraints to its complement graph $\bar{G}$. We first derive that for a connected graph $G$, if $\bar{G}$ does not belong to the following two cases: $(i)$~$diam(\bar{G})=2,3$, $(ii)~\bar{G}$ contains exactly two connected components and one of them is trivial, then $rc(G)\leq 4$, where $diam(G)$ is the diameter of $G$. Examples are given to show that this bound is best possible. Next we derive that for a connected graph $G$, if $\bar{G}$ is triangle-free, then $rc(G)\leq 6$.

math.CO↗

arXiv2010

Note on a relation between Randic index and algebraic connectivity

A conjecture of AutoGraphiX on the relation between the Randić index $R$ and the algebraic connectivity $a$ of a connected graph $G$ is: $$\frac R a\leq (\frac{n-3+2\sqrt{2}}{2})/(2(1- \cos {\fracπ{n}})) $$ with equality if and only if $G$ is $P_n$, which was proposed by Aouchiche and Hansen [M. Aouchiche and P. Hansen, A survey of automated conjectures in spectral graph theory, {\it Linear Algebra Appl.} {\bf 432}(2010), 2293--2322]. We prove that the conjecture holds for all trees and all connected graphs with edge connectivity $κ'(G)\geq 2$, and if $κ'(G)=1$, the conjecture holds for sufficiently large $n$. The conjecture also holds for all connected graphs with diameter $D\leq \frac {2(n-3+2\sqrt{2})}{π^2}$ or minimum degree $δ\geq \frac n 2$. We also prove $R\cdot a\geq \frac {8\sqrt{n-1}}{nD^2}$ and $R\cdot a\geq \frac {nδ(2δ-n+2)} {2(n-1)}$, and then $R\cdot a$ is minimum for the path if $D\leq (n-1)^{1/4}$ or $δ\geq \frac n 2-1$.

math.CO↗