Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Yair Caro

Publications and source records attributed to Yair Caro.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Sum-distinguishing number of sparse hypergraphs

A vertex labeling of a hypergraph is sum distinguishing if it uses positive integers and the sums of labels taken over the distinct hyperedges are distinct. Let s(H) be the smallest integer N such that there is a sum-distinguishing labeling of H with each label at most N. The largest value of s(H) over all hypergraphs on n vertices and m hyperedges is denoted s(n,m). We prove that s(n,m) is almost-quadratic in m as long as m is not too large. More precisely, the following holds: If n < m < n^{O(1)} then s(n,m)= m^2/w(m), where w(m) is a function that goes to infinity and is smaller than any polynomial in m. The parameter s(n,m) has close connections to several other graph and hypergraph functions, such as the irregularity strength of hypergraphs. Our result has several applications, notably: 1. We answer a question of Gyarfas et al. whether there are n-vertex hypergraphs with irregularity strength greater than 2n. In fact we show that there are n-vertex hypergraphs with irregularity strength at least n^{2-o(1)}. 2. Our results imply that s*(n)=n^2/w(n) where s*(n) is the distinguishing closed-neighborhood number, i.e., the smallest integer N such that any n-vertex graph allows for a vertex labeling with positive integers at most N so that the sums of labels on distinct closed neighborhoods of vertices are distinct.

math.CO↗

On zero-sum spanning trees and zero-sum connectivity

We consider $2$-colourings $f : E(G) \rightarrow \{ -1 ,1 \}$ of the edges of a graph $G$ with colours $-1$ and $1$ in $\mathbb{Z}$. A subgraph $H$ of $G$ is said to be a zero-sum subgraph of $G$ under $f$ if $f(H) := \sum_{e\in E(H)} f(e) =0$. We study the following type of questions, in several cases obtaining best possible results: Under which conditions on $|f(G)|$ can we guarantee the existence of a zero-sum spanning tree of $G$? The types of $G$ we consider are complete graphs, $K_3$-free graphs, $d$-trees, and maximal planar graphs. We also answer the question of when any such colouring contains a zero-sum spanning path or a zero-sum spanning tree of diameter at most $3$, showing in passing that the diameter-$3$ condition is best possible. Finally, we give, for $G = K_n$, a sharp bound on $|f(K_n)|$ by which an interesting zero-sum connectivity property is forced, namely that any two vertices are joined by a zero-sum path of length at most $4$. One feature of this paper is the proof of an Interpolation Lemma leading to a Master Theorem from which many of the above results follow and which can be of independent interest.

math.CO↗

On small balanceable, strongly-balanceable and omnitonal graphs

In Ramsey theory for graphs we are given a graph $G$ and we are required to find the least $n_0$ such that, for any $n\geq n_0$, any red/blue colouring of the edges of $K_n$ gives a subgraph $G$ all of whose edges are blue or all are red. Here we shall be requiring that, for any red/blue colouring of the edges of $K_n$, there must be a copy of $G$ such that its edges are partitioned equally as red or blue (or the sizes of the colour classes differs by one in the case when $G$ has an odd number of edges). This introduces the notion of balanceable graphs and the balance number of $G$ which, if it exists, is the minimum integer bal$(n, G)$ such that, for any red/blue colouring of $E(K_n)$ with more than bal$(n, G)$ edges of either colour, $K_n$ will contain a balanced coloured copy of $G$ as described above. This parameter was introduced by Caro, Hansberg and Montejano in \cite{2018arXivCHM}. There, the authors also introduce the strong balance number sbal$(n,G)$ and the more general omnitonal number ot$(n, G)$ which requires copies of $G$ containing a complete distribution of the number of red and blue edges over $E(G)$. In this paper we shall catalogue bal$(n, G)$, sbal$(n, G)$ and ot$(n,G)$ for all graphs $G$ on at most four edges. We shall be using some of the key results of Caro et al, which we here reproduce in full, as well as some new results which we prove here. For example, we shall prove that the union of two bipartite graphs with the same number of edges is always balanceable.

math.CO↗

A note on totally-omnitonal graphs

Let the edges of the complete graph $K_n$ be coloured red or blue, and let $G$ be a graph with $|V(G)| < n$. Then ot(n,G) is defined to be the minimum integer, if it exists, such that any such colouring of $K_n$ contains a copy of $G$ with $r$ red edges and $b$ blue edges for any $r,b \geq 0$ with $r+b= e(G)$. If ot(n,G) exists for every sufficiently large $n$, we say that $G$ is \emph{omnitonal}. Omnitonal graphs were introduced by Caro, Hansberg and Montejano [arXiv:1810.12375,2019]. Now let $G_1$, $G_2$ be two copies of $G$ with their edges coloured red or blue. If there is a colour-preserving isomorphism from $G_1$ to $G_2$ we say that the 2-colourings of $G$ are equivalent. Now we define tot(n,G) to be the minimum integer, if it exists, such that any such colouring of $K_n$ contains all non-quivalent colourings of $G$ with $r$ red edges and $b$ blue edges for any $r,b \geq 0$ with $r+b= e(G)$. If tot(n, G) exists for every sufficiently large $n$, we say that G is \emph{totally-omnitotal}. In this note we show that the only totally-omnitonal graphs are stars or star forests namely a forest all of whose components are stars.

math.CO↗

Regular Turán numbers

The regular Turán number of a graph $F$, denoted by rex$(n,F)$, is the largest number of edges in a regular graph $G$ of order $n$ such that $G$ does not contain subgraphs isomorphic to $F$. Giving a partial answer to a recent problem raised by Gerbner et al. [arXiv:1909.04980] we prove that rex$(n,F)$ asymptotically equals the (classical) Turán number whenever the chromatic number of $F$ is at least four; but it is substantially different for some 3-chromatic graphs $F$ if $n$ is odd.

math.CO↗

New results relating independence and matchings

In this paper we study relationships between the \emph{matching number}, written $μ(G)$, and the \emph{independence number}, written $α(G)$. Our first main result is to show \[ α(G) \le μ(G) + |X| - μ(G[N_G[X]]), \] where $X$ is \emph{any} intersection of maximum independent sets in $G$. Our second main result is to show \[ δ(G)α(G) \le Δ(G)μ(G), \] where $δ(G)$ and $Δ(G)$ denote the minimum and maximum vertex degrees of $G$, respectively. These results improve on and generalize known relations between $μ(G)$ and $α(G)$. Further, we also give examples showing these improvements.

math.CO↗

Unavoidable chromatic patterns in 2-colorings of the complete graph

We consider unavoidable chromatic patterns in $2$-colorings of the edges of the complete graph. Several such problems are explored being a junction point between Ramsey theory, extremal graph theory (Turán type problems), zero-sum Ramsey theory, and interpolation theorems in graph theory. A role-model of these problems is the following: Let $G$ be a graph with $e(G)$ edges. We say that $G$ is omnitonal if there exists a function ${\rm ot}(n,G)$ such that the following holds true for $n$ sufficiently large: For any $2$-coloring $f: E(K_n) \to \{red, blue \}$ such that there are more than ${\rm ot}(n,G)$ edges from each color, and for any pair of non-negative integers $r$ and $b$ with $r+b = e(G)$, there is a copy of $G$ in $K_n$ with exactly $r$ red edges and $b$ blue edges. We give a structural characterization of omnitonal graphs from which we deduce that omnitonal graphs are, in particular, bipartite graphs, and prove further that, for an omnitonal graph $G$, ${\rm ot}(n,G) = \mathcal{O}(n^{2 - \frac{1}{m}})$, where $m = m(G)$ depends only on $G$. We also present a class of graphs for which ${\rm ot}(n,G) = ex(n,G)$, the celebrated Turán numbers. Many more results and problems of similar flavor are presented.

math.CO↗

Directed domination in oriented hypergraphs

Erdős [On Schütte problem, Math. Gaz. 47 (1963)] proved that every tournament on $n$ vertices has a directed dominating set of at most $\log (n+1)$ vertices, where $\log$ is the logarithm to base $2$. He also showed that there is a tournament on $n$ vertices with no directed domination set of cardinality less than $\log n - 2 \log \log n + 1$. This notion of directed domination number has been generalized to arbitrary graphs by Caro and Henning in [Directed domination in oriented graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. (2012) 160:7--8.]. However, the generalization to directed r-uniform hypergraphs seems to be rare. Among several results, we prove the following upper and lower bounds on $\overrightarrowΓ_{r-1}(H(n,r))$, the upper directed $(r-1)$-domination number of the complete $r$-uniform hypergraph on $n$ vertices $H(n,r)$, which is the main theorem of this paper: \[c (\ln n)^{\frac{1}{r-1}} \le \overrightarrowΓ_{r-1}(H(n,r)) \le C \ln n,\] where $r$ is a positive integer and $c= c(r) > 0$ and $C = C(r) > 0$ are constants depending on $r$.

math.CO↗

Singular Ramsey and Turán numbers

We say that a subgraph $F$ of a graph $G$ is singular if the degrees $d_G(v)$ are all equal or all distinct for the vertices $v\in V(F)$. The singular Ramsey number Rs$(F)$ is the smallest positive integer $n$ such that, for every $m\geq n$, in every edge 2-coloring of $K_m$, at least one of the color classes contains $F$ as a singular subgraph. In a similar flavor, the singular Turán number Ts$(n,F)$ is defined as the maximum number of edges in a graph of order $n$, which does not contain $F$ as a singular subgraph. In this paper we initiate the study of these extremal problems. We develop methods to estimate Rs$(F)$ and Ts$(n,F)$, present tight asymptotic bounds and exact results.

math.CO↗

Induced subgraphs with many repeated degrees

Erdős, Fajtlowicz and Staton asked for the least integer $f(k)$ such that every graph with more than $f(k)$ vertices has an induced regular subgraph with at least $k$ vertices. Here we consider the following relaxed notions. Let $g(k)$ be the least integer such that every graph with more than $g(k)$ vertices has an induced subgraph with at least $k$ repeated degrees and let $h(k)$ be the least integer such that every graph with more than $h(k)$ vertices has an induced subgraph with at least $k$ maximum degree vertices. We obtain polynomial lower bounds for $h(k)$ and $g(k)$ and nontrivial linear upper bounds when the host graph has bounded maximum degree.

math.CO↗

Notes on Spreads of Degrees in Graphs

Perhaps the very first elementary exercise one encounters in graph theory is the result that any graph on at least two vertices must have at least two vertices with the same degree. There are various ways in which this result can be non-trivially generalised. For example, one can interpret this result as saying that in any graph $G$ on at least two vertices there is a set $B$ of at least two vertices such that the difference between the largest and the smallest degrees (in $G$) of the vertices of $B$ is zero. In this vein we make the following definition. For any $B\subset V(G)$, let the spread $sp(B)$ of $B$ be defined to be the difference between the largest and the smallest of the degrees of the vertices in $B$. For any $k\geq 0$, let $sp(G,k)$ be the largest cardinality of a set of vertices $B$ such that $sp(B)\leq k$. Therefore the first elementary result in graph theory says that, for any graph $G$ on at least two vertices, $sp(G,0)\geq 2$. In this paper we first give a proof of a result of Erd\" os, Chen, Rousseau and Schelp which generalises the above to $sp(G,k)\geq k+2$ for any graph on at least $k+2$ vertices. Our proof is short and elementary and does not use the famous Erd\" os-Gallai Theorem on vertex degrees. We then develop lower bounds for $sp(G,k)$ in terms of the order of $G$ and its minimum, maximum and average degree. We then use these results to give lower bounds on $sp(G,k)$ for trees and maximal outerplanar graphs, most of which we show to be sharp.

math.CO↗

The effect of local majority on global majority in connected graphs

Let ${\mathcal G}$ be an infinite family of connected graphs and let $k$ be a positive integer. We say that $k$ is ${\it forcing}$ for ${\mathcal G}$ if for all $G \in {\mathcal G}$ but finitely many, the following holds. Any $\{-1,1\}$-weighing of the edges of $G$ for which all connected subgraphs on $k$ edges are positively weighted implies that $G$ is positively weighted. Otherwise, we say that it is ${\it weakly~forcing}$ for ${\mathcal G}$ if any such weighing implies that the weight of $G$ is bounded from below by a constant. Otherwise we say that $k$ ${\it collapses}$ for ${\mathcal G}$. We classify $k$ for some of the most prominent classes of graphs, such as all connected graphs, all connected graphs with a given maximum degree and all connected graphs with a given average degree.

math.CO↗

Maximum oriented forcing number for complete graphs

The maximum oriented $k$-forcing number of a simple graph $G$, written $\MOF_k(G)$, is the maximum directed $k$-forcing number among all orientations of $G$. This invariant was recently introduced by Caro, Davila and Pepper in [CaroDavilaPepper], and in the current paper we study the special case where $G$ is the complete graph with order $n$, denoted $K_n$. While $\MOF_k(G)$ is an invariant for the underlying simple graph $G$, $\MOF_k(K_n)$ can also be interpreted as an interesting property for tournaments. Our main results further focus on the case when $k=1$. These include a lower bound on $\MOF(K_n)$ of roughly $\frac{3}{4}n$, and for $n\ge 2$, a lower bound of $n - \frac{2n}{\log_2(n)}$. Along the way, we also consider various lower bounds on the maximum oriented $k$-forcing number for the closely related complete $q$-partite graphs.

math.CO↗

Extremal $k$-forcing sets in oriented graphs

This article studies the \emph{$k$-forcing number} for oriented graphs, generalizing both the \emph{zero forcing number} for directed graphs and the $k$-forcing number for simple graphs. In particular, given a simple graph $G$, we introduce the maximum (minimum) oriented $k$-forcing number, denoted $\MOF_k(G)$ ($\mof_k(G)$), which is the largest (smallest) $k$-forcing number among all possible orientations of $G$. These new ideas are compared to known graph invariants and it is shown that, among other things, $\mof(G)$ equals the path covering number of $G$ while $\MOF_k(G)$ is greater than or equal to the independence number of $G$ -- with equality holding if $G$ is a tree or if $k$ is at least the maximum degree of $G$. Along the way, we also show that many recent results about $k$-forcing number can be modified for oriented graphs.

math.CO↗

Zero-sum $K_m$ over $\mathbb{Z}$ and the story of $K_4$

We prove the following results solving a problem raised in [Y. Caro, R. Yuster, On zero-sum and almost zero-sum subgraphs over $\mathbb{Z}$, Graphs Combin. 32 (2016), 49--63]. For a positive integer $m\geq 2$, $m\neq 4$, there are infinitely many values of $n$ such that the following holds: There is a weighting function $f:E(K_n)\to \{-1,1\}$ (and hence a weighting function $f: E(K_n)\to \{-1,0,1\}$), such that $\sum_{e\in E(K_n)}f(e)=0$ but, for every copy $H$ of $K_m$ in $K_n$, $\sum_{e\in E(H)}f(e)\neq 0$. On the other hand, for every integer $n\geq 5$ and every weighting function $f:E(K_n)\to \{-1,1\}$ such that $|\sum_{e\in E(K_n)}f(e)|\leq \binom{n}{2}-h(n)$, where $h(n)=2(n+1)$ if $n \equiv 0$ (mod $4$) and $h(n)=2n$ if $n \not\equiv 0$ (mod $4$), there is always a copy $H$ of $K_4$ in $K_n$ for which $\sum_{e\in E(H)}f(e)=0$, and the value of $h(n)$ is sharp.

math.CO↗

Irregular independence and irregular domination

If $A$ is an independent set of a graph $G$ such that the vertices in $A$ have different degrees, then we call $A$ an irregular independent set of $G$. If $D$ is a dominating set of $G$ such that the vertices that are not in $D$ have different numbers of neighbours in $D$, then we call $D$ an irregular dominating set of $G$. The size of a largest irregular independent set of $G$ and the size of a smallest irregular dominating set of $G$ are denoted by $α_{ir}(G)$ and $γ_{ir}(G)$, respectively. We initiate the investigation of these two graph parameters. For each of them, we obtain sharp bounds in terms of basic graph parameters such as the order, the size, the minimum degree and the maximum degree, and we obtain Nordhaus-Gaddum-type bounds. We also establish sharp bounds relating the two parameters. Furthermore, we characterize the graphs $G$ with $α_{ir}(G)=1$, we determine those that are planar, and we determine those that are outerplanar.

math.CO↗

Equating two maximum degrees

Given a graph $G$, we would like to find (if it exists) the largest induced subgraph $H$ in which there are at least $k$ vertices realizing the maximum degree of $H$. This problem was first posed by Caro and Yuster. They proved, for example, that for every graph $G$ on $n$ vertices we can guarantee, for $k = 2$, such an induced subgraph $H$ by deleting at most $2\sqrt{n}$ vertices, but the question if $2\sqrt{n}$ is best possible remains open. Among the results obtained in this paper we prove that: 1. For every graph $G$ on $n \geq 4$ vertices we can delete at most $\lceil \frac{- 3 + \sqrt{ 8n- 15}}{2 } \rceil$ vertices to get an induced subgraph $H$ with at least two vertices realizing $Δ(H)$, and this bound is sharp, solving the problems left open by Caro and Yuster. 2.For every graph $G$ with maximum degree $Δ\geq 1$ we can delete at most $\lceil \frac{ -3 + \sqrt{8Δ+1}}{2 } \rceil$ vertices to get an induced subgraph $H$ with at least two vertices realizing $Δ(H)$, and this bound is sharp. 3. Every graph $G$ with $Δ(G) \leq 2$ and least $2k - 1$ vertices (respectively $2k - 2$ vertices if k is even) contains an induced subgraph $H$ in which at least $k$ vertices realise $Δ(H)$, and these bound are sharp.

math.CO↗

Zero-sum subsequences in bounded-sum $\{-1, 1\}$-sequences

The following result gives the flavor of this paper: Let $t$, $k$ and $q$ be integers such that $q\geq 0$, $0\leq t < k$ and $t \equiv k \,({\rm mod}\, 2)$, and let $s\in [0,t+1]$ be the unique integer satisfying $s \equiv q + \frac{k-t-2}{2} \,({\rm mod} \, (t+2))$. Then for any integer $n$ such that \[n \ge \max\left\{k,\frac{1}{2(t+2)}k^2 + \frac{q-s}{t+2}k - \frac{t}{2} + s\right\}\] and any function $f:[n]\to \{-1,1\}$ with $|\sum_{i=1}^nf(i)| \le q$, there is a set $B \subseteq [n]$ of $k$ consecutive integers with $|\sum_{y\in B}f(y)| \le t$. Moreover, this bound is sharp for all the parameters involved and a characterization of the extremal sequences is given. This and other similar results involving different subsequences are presented, including decompositions of sequences into subsequences of bounded weight.

math.CO↗