Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Yair Hayut

Publications and source records attributed to Yair Hayut.

45 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Weak prediction principles

We prove the consistency of the failure of the weak diamond $Φ_λ$ at strongly inaccessible cardinals. On the other hand, we show that the very weak diamond $Ψ_λ$ is equivalent to the statement $2^{<λ}<2^λ$ and hence holds at every strongly inaccessible cardinal.

math.LO↗

Magidor cardinals

We define Magidor cardinals as Jónsson cardinals upon replacing colorings of finite subsets by colorings of $\aleph_0$-bounded subsets. Unlike Jónsson cardinals which appear at some low level of large cardinals, we prove the consistency of having quite large cardinals along with the fact that no Magidor cardinal exists.

math.LO↗

The strong tree property and weak square

We show that it is consistent, relative to $ω$ many supercompact cardinals, that the super tree property holds at $\aleph_n$ for all $2 \leq n < ω$ but there are weak square and a very good scale at $\aleph_ω$.

math.LO↗

On Foreman's maximality principle

In this paper we consider the Foreman's maximality principle, which says that any non-trivial forcing notion either adds a new real or collapses some cardinals. We prove the consistency of some of its consequences. We prove that it is consistent that every $c.c.c.$ forcing adds a real and that for every uncountable regular cardinal $κ$, every $κ$-closed forcing of size $2^{<κ}$ collapses some cardinals.

math.LO↗

Square and Delta reflection

Starting from infinitely many supercompact cardinals, we force a model of ZFC where $\aleph_{ω^2+1}$ satisfies simultaneously a strong principle of reflection, called $Δ$-reflection, and a version of the square principle, denoted $\square(\aleph_{ω^2+1}).$ Thus we show that $\aleph_{ω^2+1}$ can satisfy simultaneously a strong reflection principle and an anti-reflection principle.

math.LO↗

Restrictions on Forcings That Change Cofinalities

In this paper we investigate some properties of forcing which can be considered "nice" in the context of singularizing regular cardinals to have an uncountable cofinality. We show that such forcing which changes cofinality of a regular cardinal, cannot be too nice and must cause some "damage" to the structure of cardinals and stationary sets. As a consequence there is no analogue to the Prikry forcing, in terms of "nice" properties, when changing cofinalities to be uncountable.

math.LO↗