arXiv subjects

Yanji He

Publications and source records attributed to Yanji He.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

CascadeFilter: Cost-Efficient Semantic Filtering with Joint Threshold Selection

Semantic filtering selects records that satisfy a natural-language predicate and is an important operation in data analytics based on large language models (LLMs). Executing an expensive model on every document incurs substantial inference cost. Existing approaches reduce this cost by accepting predictions from cheaper models and forwarding uncertain records to an oracle. Task Cascades further varies document portions and operations, and provides an accuracy-guaranteed extension. However, its threshold calibration follows a prescribed adjustment sequence after cascade assembly, rather than minimizing cost over alternative combinations of stage thresholds. Motivated by this, we propose CascadeFilter, a three-stage semantic filtering method that jointly searches the thresholds for a small language model operating on extracted evidence and full documents, with unresolved records forwarded to the oracle. For a fixed cascade, we formulate threshold selection as minimizing token-aware cost subject to an oracle-relative error constraint, and select the least-cost certified configuration in a pre-specified grid. A finite-population calibration procedure bounds oracle-relative error after selection, using fixed-sequence tests on threshold tracks to allocate the multiple-testing budget. We further combine lexical and dense retrieval, reranking, and neighborhood-supported confidence to improve evidence extraction and routing. These components enhance the cascade while leaving its certification interface unchanged. Across six datasets and 13 evaluation settings, the reported results have the highest benchmark accuracy and macro-averaged F1 score in 12 settings each. These comparisons describe the reported operating points; the accuracy guarantee concerns agreement with the oracle.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2026

Interlock: From Local Correctness to Task Completion in Long-Horizon Agents

Large language model agents increasingly undertake long-horizon tasks in complex environments characterized by fragmented evidence, partially completed states, and dependencies across resources and artifacts. Existing agents may satisfy individual requirements while failing to maintain these relationships, producing locally correct but incomplete outcomes. These failures arise because task completion depends on relationships among environmental evidence, consequential decisions, and required effects. To address this completion gap, we propose Interlock, a framework for task synthesis that represents each task as a typed completion graph. Grounding edges connect public evidence to decisions, coupling hyperedges impose joint constraints across components, and realization edges connect decisions to all required downstream effects. Interlock compiles this graph into a resettable workspace, a public request, and an evaluation rubric. A source-coverage review checks whether the original requirements survive generation, while a public-input review checks whether the rubric is supported by the materials available to the solver. An agent-as-judge inspects execution artifacts and runs verification scripts, retaining trajectories judged to satisfy all mandatory requirements. To evaluate training utility, we fine-tune two Qwen3.6 backbones on their own accepted trajectories. Across the two backbones, training improves AutomationBench task pass rates by 4.00-4.50 percentage points, JobBench weighted scores by 3.20-6.64 points, and Harvey LAB criterion pass rates by 3.89-4.16 percentage points. These results demonstrate the training utility of the synthesized experience across external task environments.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

LM-mixup: Text Data Augmentation via Language Model based Mixup

Instruction tuning is crucial for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs), yet the quality of instruction-following data varies significantly. While high-quality data is paramount, it is often scarce; conversely, abundant low-quality data is frequently discarded, leading to substantial information loss. Existing data augmentation methods struggle to augment this low-quality data effectively, and the evaluation of such techniques remains poorly defined. To address this, we formally define the task of Instruction Distillation: distilling multiple low-quality and redundant inputs into high-quality and coherent instruction-output pairs. Specifically, we introduce a comprehensive data construction pipeline to create MIXTURE, a 144K-sample dataset pairing low-quality or semantically redundant imperfect instruction clusters with their high-quality distillations. We then introduce LM-Mixup, by first performing supervised fine-tuning on MIXTURE and then optimizing it with reinforcement learning. This process uses three complementary reward signals: quality, semantic alignment, and format compliance, via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). We demonstrate that LM-Mixup effectively augments imperfect datasets: fine-tuning LLMs on its distilled data, which accounts for only about 3% of the entire dataset, not only surpasses full-dataset training but also competes with state-of-the-art high-quality data selection methods across multiple benchmarks. Our work establishes that low-quality data is a valuable resource when properly distilled and augmented with LM-Mixup, significantly enhancing the efficiency and performance of instruction-tuned LLMs.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

IDEA: An Interpretable and Editable Decision-Making Framework for LLMs via Verbal-to-Numeric Calibration

Large Language Models are increasingly deployed for decision-making, yet their adoption in high-stakes domains remains limited by miscalibrated probabilities, unfaithful explanations, and inability to incorporate expert knowledge precisely. We propose IDEA, a framework that extracts LLM decision knowledge into an interpretable parametric model over semantically meaningful factors. Through joint learning of verbal-to-numerical mappings and decision parameters via EM, correlated sampling that preserves factor dependencies, and direct parameter editing with mathematical guarantees, IDEA produces calibrated probabilities while enabling quantitative human-AI collaboration. Experiments across five datasets show IDEA with Qwen-3-32B (78.6%) outperforms DeepSeek R1 (68.1%) and GPT-5.2 (77.9%), achieving perfect factor exclusion and exact calibration -- precision unattainable through prompting alone. The implementation is publicly available at https://github.com/leonbig/IDEA.

cs.AI↗