arXiv subjects

Yanna Feng

Publications and source records attributed to Yanna Feng.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Seeing Is No Longer Believing: Frontier Image Generation Models, Synthetic Visual Evidence, and Real-World Risk

Frontier image generation has moved from artistic synthesis toward synthetic visual evidence. Systems such as GPT Image 2, Nano Banana Pro, Nano Banana 2, Nano Banana 2 Lite, Grok Imagine Image Quality, Qwen Image 2.0 Pro, and Seedream 5.0 Lite combine photorealistic rendering, readable typography, reference consistency, editing control, and in several cases reasoning or search-grounded image construction. These capabilities create large benefits for design, education, accessibility, and communication, yet they also weaken one of society's most common trust shortcuts: the belief that a plausible picture is a reliable record. This paper provides a source-grounded technical and policy analysis of synthetic visual risk. We first summarize the public capabilities of recent image models, then analyze public incidents involving fake crisis images, celebrity and public-figure imagery, medical scans, forged-looking documents, synthetic screenshots, phishing assets, and market-moving rumors. We introduce a capability-weighted risk framework that links model affordances to real-world harm in finance, medicine, news, law, emergency response, identity verification, and civic discourse. Our findings show that risk is driven less by photorealism alone than by the convergence of realism, legible text, identity persistence, fast iteration, and distribution context. We argue for layered control: model-side restrictions, cryptographic provenance, visible labeling, platform friction, sector-grade verification, and incident response. The paper closes with practical recommendations for model providers, platforms, newsrooms, financial institutions, healthcare systems, legal organizations, regulators, and ordinary users.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

The Rise of Verbal Tics in Large Language Models: A Systematic Analysis Across Frontier Models

As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to evolve through alignment techniques such as Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Constitutional AI, a growing and increasingly conspicuous phenomenon has emerged: the proliferation of verbal tics--repetitive, formulaic linguistic patterns that pervade model outputs. These range from sycophantic openers ("That's a great question!", "Awesome!") to pseudo-empathetic affirmations ("I completely understand your concern", "I'm right here to catch you") and overused vocabulary ("delve", "tapestry", "nuanced"). In this paper, we present a systematic analysis of the verbal tic phenomenon across eight state-of-the-art LLMs: GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Grok 4.3, Doubao-Seed-2.1-pro, Kimi K2.6, DeepSeek V4 Pro, and GLM-5.2. Utilizing a custom evaluation framework for standardized API-based evaluation, we assess 10,000 prompts across 10 task categories in both English and Chinese, yielding 160,000 model responses. We introduce the Verbal Tic Index (VTI), a composite metric quantifying tic prevalence, and analyze its correlation with sycophancy, lexical diversity, and human-perceived naturalness. Our findings reveal significant inter-model variation: Gemini 3.1 Pro exhibits the highest VTI (0.590), while DeepSeek V4 Pro achieves the lowest (0.295). We further demonstrate that verbal tics accumulate over multi-turn conversations, are amplified in subjective tasks, and show distinct cross-lingual patterns. Human evaluation (N = 120) confirms a strong inverse relationship between sycophancy and perceived naturalness (r = -0.87, p < 0.001). These results underscore the "alignment tax" of current training paradigms and highlight the urgent need for more authentic human-AI interaction frameworks.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Council Mode: A Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Consensus Framework for Reducing LLM Hallucination and Bias

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated advanced capabilities but often suffer from factual inaccuracies (hallucinations) and systematic biases. These issues, sometimes amplified in specific architectures like Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) which motivate our work, pose risks for reliable deployment. To address these challenges, we propose the Council Mode, a multi-agent consensus framework. Our approach dispatches queries to multiple heterogeneous frontier LLMs in parallel and synthesizes their outputs using a dedicated consensus model. The pipeline consists of three phases: an intelligent triage for query complexity, parallel generation across diverse models, and a structured synthesis that identifies agreement, disagreement, and unique findings. In our evaluation, conducted under controlled no-web settings, the Council Mode achieved a 41.7% relative reduction in hallucination rates on a 1,200-sample HaluEval subset and a 7.5-point improvement on TruthfulQA compared to the top-performing individual model. On our curated MDR-500 multi-domain reasoning benchmark, the Council Mode achieved a Quality Score of 95.4%, representing a 9.2-point improvement over the best individual model. The framework also exhibited lower measured bias variance under our rubric-based evaluation protocol. We provide a cost-effectiveness analysis showing that the framework incurs a 4.2x token-cost overhead, making it most suitable for accuracy-prioritized applications where the cost of errors exceeds the added inference cost. These findings suggest that structured multi-agent consensus is a promising direction for enhancing the reliability and factual grounding of LLM-generated content.

cs.CL↗