arXiv subjects

Yanxi Lu

Publications and source records attributed to Yanxi Lu.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Information Density Imbalance in Visual Object Detection

In object detection, the number of instances is typically used to determine whether a dataset exhibits a long-tailed distribution, implicitly assuming that the model will perform poorly on categories with fewer instances. This assumption has led to extensive research on category bias in datasets with imbalanced instance numbers. However, even in datasets where instance numbers are relatively balanced, models still exhibit category bias, indicating that instance count alone cannot explain this phenomenon. In this work, we first introduce the concept and measurement of information density. We then observe a significant negative correlation between a category's information density and its accuracy, and we investigate how the training process impacts this relationship. Empirical studies suggest that information density imbalance may be a potential source of category bias. To preliminarily validate the potential of information density, we made simple improvements to three advanced object detection loss functions using this concept. Experiments on the Pascal VOC, COCO-LT, and LVIS datasets demonstrate that information density can significantly reduce model bias while effectively enhancing the overall performance of existing loss functions. This study provides a new perspective for understanding the generalized bias phenomenon in object detection models and offers new tools for designing fairer loss functions and training strategies.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

MathDoc: Benchmarking Structured Extraction and Active Refusal on Noisy Mathematics Exam Papers

The automated extraction of structured questions from paper-based mathematics exams is fundamental to intelligent education, yet remains challenging in real-world settings due to severe visual noise. Existing benchmarks mainly focus on clean documents or generic layout analysis, overlooking both the structural integrity of mathematical problems and the ability of models to actively reject incomplete inputs. We introduce MathDoc, the first benchmark for document-level information extraction from authentic high school mathematics exam papers. MathDoc contains \textbf{3,609} carefully curated questions with real-world artifacts and explicitly includes unrecognizable samples to evaluate active refusal behavior. We propose a multi-dimensional evaluation framework covering stem accuracy, visual similarity, and refusal capability. Experiments on SOTA MLLMs, including Qwen3-VL and Gemini-2.5-Pro, show that although end-to-end models achieve strong extraction performance, they consistently fail to refuse illegible inputs, instead producing confident but invalid outputs. These results highlight a critical gap in current MLLMs and establish MathDoc as a benchmark for assessing model reliability under degraded document conditions. Our project repository is available at \href{https://github.com/winnk123/papers/tree/master}{GitHub repository}

cs.CV↗

arXiv2024

Knowledgeable Preference Alignment for LLMs in Domain-specific Question Answering

Deploying large language models (LLMs) to real scenarios for domain-specific question answering (QA) is a key thrust for LLM applications, which poses numerous challenges, especially in ensuring that responses are both accommodating to user requirements and appropriately leveraging domain-specific knowledge bases. They are the two major difficulties for LLM application as vanilla fine-tuning falls short of addressing. Combining these requirements, we conceive of them as the requirement for the model's preference to be harmoniously aligned with humans'. Thus, we introduce Knowledgeable Preference AlignmenT (KnowPAT), which constructs two kinds of preference sets to tackle the two issues. Besides, we design a new alignment objective to align the LLM preference with different human preferences uniformly, aiming to optimize LLM performance in real-world, domain-specific QA settings. Adequate experiments and comprehensive comparisons with 15 baseline methods illustrate that our KnowPAT is a superior pipeline for real-scenario domain-specific QA with LLMs.

cs.CL↗