arXiv subjects

Yde Venema

Publications and source records attributed to Yde Venema.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Interpolation for Converse PDL

Converse PDL is the extension of propositional dynamic logic with a converse operation on programs. Our main result states that Converse PDL enjoys the (local) Craig Interpolation Property, with respect to both atomic programs and propositional variables. As a corollary we establish the Beth Definability Property for the logic. Our interpolation proof is based on an adaptation of Maehara's proof-theoretic method. For this purpose we introduce a sound and complete cyclic sequent system for this logic. This calculus features an analytic cut rule and uses a focus mechanism for recognising successful cycles.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Interpolation for the two-way modal mu-calculus

The two-way modal mu-calculus is the extension of the (standard) one-way mu-calculus with converse (backward-looking) modalities. For this logic we introduce two new sequent-style proof calculi: a non-wellfounded system admitting infinite branches and a finitary, cyclic version of this that employs annotations. As is common in sequent systems for two-way modal logics, our calculi feature an analytic cut rule. What distinguishes our approach is the use of so-called trace atoms, which serve to apply Vardi's two-way automata in a proof-theoretic setting. We prove soundness and completeness for both systems and subsequently use the cyclic calculus to show that the two-way mu-calculus has the (local) Craig interpolation property, with respect to both propositions and modalities. Our proof uses a version of Maehara's method adapted to cyclic proof systems. As a corollary we prove that the two-way mu-calculus also enjoys Beth's definability property.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Propositional Dynamic Logic has Craig Interpolation: a tableau-based proof

We show that Propositional Dynamic Logic (PDL) has the Craig Interpolation Property. This question has been open for many years. Three proof attempts were published, but later criticized in the literature or retracted. Our proof is based on the main ideas from Borzechowski (1988, master thesis). We define a cyclic tableau system for PDL with a loading mechanism to recognize successful repeats. For this system, we show soundness and completeness via a game. To show interpolation, we modify Maehara's method to work for tableaux with repeats: we first define pre-interpolants at each node, and then use a quasi-tableau to define interpolants for clusters (strongly connected components). In different terms, our method solves the fixpoint equations that characterize the desired interpolants, and the method ensures that the solutions to these equations can be expressed within PDL. The proof is constructive and we show how to compute interpolants. We also make available a Haskell implementation of the proof system that provides interpolants. Lastly, we mention ongoing work to formally verify this proof in the interactive theorem prover Lean, and several questions for future work.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

Proof Systems for the Modal $μ$-Calculus Obtained by Determinizing Automata

Automata operating on infinite objects feature prominently in the theory of the modal $μ$-calculus. One such application concerns the tableau games introduced by Niwiński & Walukiewicz, of which the winning condition for infinite plays can be naturally checked by a nondeterministic parity stream automaton. Inspired by work of Jungteerapanich and Stirling we show how determinization constructions of this automaton may be used to directly obtain proof systems for the $μ$-calculus. More concretely, we introduce a binary tree construction for determinizing nondeterministic parity stream automata. Using this construction we define the annotated cyclic proof system $\mathsf{BT}$, where formulas are annotated by tuples of binary strings. Soundness and Completeness of this system follow almost immediately from the correctness of the determinization method.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

Focus-style proofs for the two-way alternation-free $μ$-calculus

We introduce a cyclic proof system for the two-way alternation-free modal $μ$-calculus. The system manipulates one-sided Gentzen sequents and locally deals with the backwards modalities by allowing analytic applications of the cut rule. The global effect of backwards modalities on traces is handled by making the semantics relative to a specific strategy of the opponent in the evaluation game. This allows us to augment sequents by so-called trace atoms, describing traces that the proponent can construct against the opponent's strategy. The idea for trace atoms comes from Vardi's reduction of alternating two-way automata to deterministic one-way automata. Using the multi-focus annotations introduced earlier by Marti and Venema, we turn this trace-based system into a path-based system. We prove that our system is sound for all sequents and complete for sequents not containing trace atoms.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2022

Coalgebraic Geometric Logic: Basic Theory

Using the theory of coalgebra, we introduce a uniform framework for adding modalities to the language of propositional geometric logic. Models for this logic are based on coalgebras for an endofunctor on some full subcategory of the category of topological spaces and continuous functions. We investigate derivation systems, soundness and completeness for such geometric modal logics, and we specify a method of lifting an endofunctor on Set, accompanied by a collection of predicate liftings, to an endofunctor on the category of topological spaces, again accompanied by a collection of (open) predicate liftings. Furthermore, we compare the notions of modal equivalence, behavioural equivalence and bisimulation on the resulting class of models, and we provide a final object for the corresponding category.

math.LO↗

arXiv2022

Disjunctive bases: normal forms and model theory for modal logics

We present the concept of a disjunctive basis as a generic framework for normal forms in modal logic based on coalgebra. Disjunctive bases were defined in previous work on completeness for modal fixpoint logics, where they played a central role in the proof of a generic completeness theorem for coalgebraic mu-calculi. Believing the concept has a much wider significance, here we investigate it more thoroughly in its own right. We show that the presence of a disjunctive basis at the "one-step" level entails a number of good properties for a coalgebraic mu-calculus, in particular, a simulation theorem showing that every alternating automaton can be transformed into an equivalent nondeterministic one. Based on this, we prove a Lyndon theorem for the full fixpoint logic, its fixpoint-free fragment and its one-step fragment, and a Uniform Interpolation result, for both the full mu-calculus and its fixpoint-free fragment. We also raise the questions, when a disjunctive basis exists, and how disjunctive bases are related to Moss' coalgebraic "nabla" modalities. Nabla formulas provide disjunctive bases for many coalgebraic modal logics, but there are cases where disjunctive bases give useful normal forms even when nabla formulas fail to do so, our prime example being graded modal logic. We also show that disjunctive bases are preserved by forming sums, products and compositions of coalgebraic modal logics, providing tools for modular construction of modal logics admitting disjunctive bases. Finally, we consider the problem of giving a category-theoretic formulation of disjunctive bases, and provide a partial solution.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

Filtration and canonical completeness for continuous modal mu-calculi

The continuous modal mu-calculus is a fragment of the modal mu-calculus, where the application of fixpoint operators is restricted to formulas whose functional interpretation is Scott-continuous, rather than merely monotone. By game-theoretic means, we show that this relatively expressive fragment still allows two important techniques of basic modal logic, which notoriously fail for the full modal mu-calculus: filtration and canonical models. In particular, we show that the Filtration Theorem holds for formulas in the language of the continuous modal mu-calculus. As a consequence we obtain the finite model property over a wide range of model classes. Moreover, we show that if a basic modal logic L is canonical and the class of L-frames admits filtration, then the logic obtained by adding continuous fixpoint operators to L is sound and complete with respect to the class of L-frames. This generalises recent results on a strictly weaker fragment of the modal mu-calculus, viz. PDL.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

On the size of disjunctive formulas in the $μ$-calculus

A key result in the theory of the modal mu-calculus is the disjunctive normal form theorem by Janin & Walukiewicz, stating that every mu-calculus formula is semantically equivalent to a so-called disjunctive formula. These disjunctive formulas have good computational properties and play a pivotal role in the theory of the modal mu-calculus. It is therefore an interesting question what the best normalisation procedure is for rewriting a formula into an equivalent disjunctive formula of minimal size. The best constructions that are known from the literature are automata-theoretic in nature and consist of a guarded transformation, i.e., the constructing of an equivalent guarded alternating automaton from a mu-calculus formula, followed by a Simulation Theorem stating that any such alternating automaton can be transformed into an equivalent non-deterministic one. Both of these transformations are exponential constructions, making the best normalisation procedure doubly exponential. Our key contribution presented here shows that the two parts of the normalisation procedure can be integrated, leading to a procedure that is single-exponential in the closure size of the formula.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

Focus-style proof systems and interpolation for the alternation-free $μ$-calculus

In this paper we introduce a cut-free sequent calculus for the alternation-free fragment of the modal $μ$-calculus. This system allows for cyclic proofs and uses a simple focus mechanism to control the unravelling of fixpoints along infinite branches. We show that the proof system is sound and complete and apply it to prove that the alternation-free fragment has the Craig interpolation property.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2020

Size matters in the modal $μ$-calculus

We discuss and compare complexity measures for the modal $μ$-calculus, focusing on size and alternation depth. As a yardstick we take Wilke's alternating tree automata, which we shall call parity formulas in the text. Building on work by Bruse, Friedmann & Lange, we compare two size measures for $μ$-calculus formulas: subformula-size,i.e. , the number of subformulas of the given formula, and closure-size. These notions correspond to the representation of a formula as a parity formula based on, respectively, its subformula dag, and its closure graph. What distinguishes our approach is that we are explicit about the role of alpha-equivalence, as naively renaming bound variables can lead to an exponential blow-up. In addition, we match the formula's alternation depth with the index of the parity formula. We start in a setting without alpha-equivalence. We define subformula-size and closure-size and recall that a $μ$-calculus formula can be transformed into a parity formula of size linear wrt subformula size, and give a construction that transforms a $μ$-calculus formula into an equivalent parity formula linear wrt closure-size. Conversely, there is a standard transformation producing a $μ$-calculus formula of exponential subformula -- but linear closure-size in terms of the size of the original parity formula. We identify so-called untwisted parity formulas for which a transformation linear in subformula-size exists. We then introduce size notions that are completely invariant under alpha equivalence. We transfer the result of Bruse et alii, showing that also in our setting closure-size can be exponentially smaller than subformula-size. We also show how to rename bound variables so that alpha-equivalence becomes syntactic identity on the closure set. Finally, we review the complexity of guarded transformations.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2019

Completeness for Game Logic

Game logic was introduced by Rohit Parikh in the 1980s as a generalisation of propositional dynamic logic (PDL) for reasoning about outcomes that players can force in determined 2-player games. Semantically, the generalisation from programs to games is mirrored by moving from Kripke models to monotone neighbourhood models. Parikh proposed a natural PDL-style Hilbert system which was easily proved to be sound, but its completeness has thus far remained an open problem. In this paper, we introduce a cut-free sequent calculus for game logic, and two cut-free sequent calculi that manipulate annotated formulas, one for game logic and one for the monotone mu-calculus, the variant of the polymodal mu-calculus where the semantics is given by monotone neighbourhood models instead of Kripke structures. We show these systems are sound and complete, and that completeness of Parikh's axiomatization follows. Our approach builds on recent ideas and results by Afshari & Leigh (LICS 2017) in that we obtain completeness via a sequence of proof transformations between the systems. A crucial ingredient is a validity-preserving translation from game logic to the monotone mu-calculus.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2018

Model Theory of Monadic Predicate Logic with the Infinity Quantifier

This paper establishes model-theoretic properties of $\mathrm{FOE}^{\infty}$, a variation of monadic first-order logic that features the generalised quantifier $\exists^\infty$ (`there are infinitely many'). We provide syntactically defined fragments of $\mathrm{FOE}^{\infty}$ characterising four different semantic properties of $\mathrm{FOE}^{\infty}$-sentences: (1) being monotone and (2) (Scott) continuous in a given set of monadic predicates; (3) having truth preserved under taking submodels or (4) invariant under taking quotients. In each case, we produce an effectively defined map that translates an arbitrary sentence $φ$ to a sentence $φ^{p}$ belonging to the corresponding syntactic fragment, with the property that $φ$ is equivalent to $φ^{p}$ precisely when it has the associated semantic property. Our methodology is first to provide these results in the simpler setting of monadic first-order logic with ($\mathrm{FOE}$) and without ($\mathrm{FO}$) equality, and then move to $\mathrm{FOE}^{\infty}$ by including the generalised quantifier $\exists^\infty$ into the picture. As a corollary of our developments, we obtain that the four semantic properties above are decidable for $\mathrm{FOE}^{\infty}$-sentences. Moreover, our results are directly relevant to the characterisation of automata and expressiveness modulo bisimilirity for variants of monadic second-order logic. This application is developed in a companion paper.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2018

The Power of the Weak

A landmark result in the study of logics for formal verification is Janin & Walukiewicz's theorem, stating that the modal $μ$-calculus ($μ\mathrm{ML}$) is equivalent modulo bisimilarity to standard monadic second-order logic (here abbreviated as $\mathrm{smso}$), over the class of labelled transition systems (LTSs for short). Our work proves two results of the same kind, one for the alternation-free fragment of $μ\mathrm{ML}$ ($μ_D\mathrm{ML}$) and one for weak $\mathrm{mso}$ ($\mathrm{wmso}$). Whereas it was known that $μ_D\mathrm{ML}$ and $\mathrm{wmso}$ are equivalent modulo bisimilarity on binary trees, our analysis shows that the picture radically changes once we reason over arbitrary LTSs. The first theorem that we prove is that, over LTSs, $μ_D\mathrm{ML}$ is equivalent modulo bisimilarity to noetherian $\mathrm{mso}$ ($\mathrm{nmso}$), a newly introduced variant of $\mathrm{smso}$ where second-order quantification ranges over "well-founded" subsets only. Our second theorem starts from $\mathrm{wmso}$, and proves it equivalent modulo bisimilarity to a fragment of $μ_D\mathrm{ML}$ defined by a notion of continuity. Analogously to Janin & Walukiewicz's result, our proofs are automata-theoretic in nature: as another contribution, we introduce classes of parity automata characterising the expressiveness of $\mathrm{wmso}$ and $\mathrm{nmso}$ (on tree models) and of $μ_C\mathrm{ML}$ and $μ_D\mathrm{ML}$ (for all transition systems).

cs.LO↗

arXiv2018

Some model theory for the modal $μ$-calculus: syntactic characterisations of semantic properties

This paper contributes to the theory of the modal $μ$-calculus by proving some model-theoretic results. More in particular, we discuss a number of semantic properties pertaining to formulas of the modal $μ$-calculus. For each of these properties we provide a corresponding syntactic fragment, in the sense that a $μ$-formula $ξ$ has the given property iff it is equivalent to a formula $ξ'$ in the corresponding fragment. Since this formula $ξ'$ will always be effectively obtainable from $ξ$, as a corollary, for each of the properties under discussion, we prove that it is decidable in elementary time whether a given $μ$-calculus formula has the property or not. The properties that we study all concern the way in which the meaning of a formula $ξ$ in a model depends on the meaning of a single, fixed proposition letter $p$. For example, consider a formula $ξ$ which is monotone in $p$; such a formula a formula $ξ$ is called continuous (respectively, fully additive), if in addition it satisfies the property that, if $ξ$ is true at a state $s$ then there is a finite set (respectively, a singleton set) $U$ such that $ξ$ remains true at $s$ if we restrict the interpretation of $p$ to the set $U$. Each of the properties that we consider is, in a similar way, associated with one of the following special kinds of subset of a tree model: singletons, finite sets, finitely branching subtrees, noetherian subtrees (i.e., without infinite paths), and branches. Our proofs for these characterization results will be automata-theoretic in nature; we will see that the effectively defined maps on formulas are in fact induced by rather simple transformations on modal automata. Thus our results can also be seen as a contribution to the model theory of modal automata.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2017

Parity Games and Automata for Game Logic (Extended Version)

Parikh's game logic is a PDL-like fixpoint logic interpreted on monotone neighbourhood frames that represent the strategic power of players in determined two-player games. Game logic translates into a fragment of the monotone $μ$-calculus, which in turn is expressively equivalent to monotone modal automata. Parity games and automata are important tools for dealing with the combinatorial complexity of nested fixpoints in modal fixpoint logics, such as the modal $μ$-calculus. In this paper, we (1) discuss the semantics a of game logic over neighbourhood structures in terms of parity games, and (2) use these games to obtain an automata-theoretic characterisation of the fragment of the monotone $μ$-calculus that corresponds to game logic. Our proof makes extensive use of structures that we call syntax graphs that combine the ease-of-use of syntax trees of formulas with the flexibility and succinctness of automata. They are essentially a graph-based view of the alternating tree automata that were introduced by Wilke in the study of modal $μ$-calculus.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2017

An expressive completeness theorem for coalgebraic modal mu-calculi

Generalizing standard monadic second-order logic for Kripke models, we introduce monadic second-order logic interpreted over coalgebras for an arbitrary set functor. We then consider invariance under behavioral equivalence of MSO-formulas. More specifically, we investigate whether the coalgebraic mu-calculus is the bisimulation-invariant fragment of the monadic second-order language for a given functor. Using automatatheoretic techniques and building on recent results by the third author, we show that in order to provide such a characterization result it suffices to find what we call an adequate uniform construction for the coalgebraic type functor. As direct applications of this result we obtain a partly new proof of the Janin-Walukiewicz Theorem for the modal mu-calculus, avoiding the use of syntactic normal forms, and bisimulation invariance results for the bag functor (graded modal logic) and all exponential polynomial functors (including the "game functor"). As a more involved application, involving additional non-trivial ideas, we also derive a characterization theorem for the monotone modal mu-calculus, with respect to a natural monadic second-order language for monotone neighborhood models.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2016

Completeness of Flat Coalgebraic Fixpoint Logics

Modal fixpoint logics traditionally play a central role in computer science, in particular in artificial intelligence and concurrency. The mu-calculus and its relatives are among the most expressive logics of this type. However, popular fixpoint logics tend to trade expressivity for simplicity and readability, and in fact often live within the single variable fragment of the mu-calculus. The family of such flat fixpoint logics includes, e.g., LTL, CTL, and the logic of common knowledge. Extending this notion to the generic semantic framework of coalgebraic logic enables covering a wide range of logics beyond the standard mu-calculus including, e.g., flat fragments of the graded mu-calculus and the alternating-time mu-calculus (such as alternating-time temporal logic ATL), as well as probabilistic and monotone fixpoint logics. We give a generic proof of completeness of the Kozen-Park axiomatization for such flat coalgebraic fixpoint logics.

cs.LO↗