arXiv subjects

Yen-Ting Piao

Publications and source records attributed to Yen-Ting Piao.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Tri-PvP: Exposing Modality Bias in Omni-Modal Large Language Models through Perceptual-Propositional Evidence Conflicts

Omni-modal large language models (OLLMs) jointly process vision, audio, and text, yet their modality bias under cross-modal conflict remains underexplored. Existing benchmarks conflate two distinct forms of evidence within a single modality: perceptual signals (e.g., a photograph or recording of a dog) and propositional signals (e.g., the declarative claim "this is a dog"), such that any measured modality bias is inherently confounded with evidence-form bias, precluding clean attribution to either source. To address this, we introduce Tri-PvP, an 8,000-sample tri-modal conflict benchmark crossing vision, audio, and text, where vision and audio each take perceptual or propositional form. Evaluating five OLLMs, we find robust visual bias across most models and evidence-type conditions. Crucially, we reveal a systematic asymmetry in evidence-form bias: models exhibit a stronger bias toward perceptual signal in vision but propositional in audio. Further analyses via layer-wise linear probing and contrastive decoding reveal that modality bias is already linearly decodable from early representation layers and can only be partially mitigated, calling for mitigation strategies beyond surface-level interventions.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

MUGEN: Evaluating and Improving Multi-audio Understanding of Large Audio-Language Models

While multi-audio understanding is critical for large audio-language models (LALMs), it remains underexplored. We introduce MUGEN, a comprehensive benchmark evaluating this capability across speech, general audio, and music. Our experiments reveal consistent weaknesses in multi-audio settings, and performance degrades sharply as the number of concurrent audio inputs increases, identifying input scaling as a fundamental bottleneck. We further investigate training-free strategies and observe that Audio-Permutational Self-Consistency, which diversifies the order of audio candidates, helps models form more robust aggregated predictions, yielding up to 6.28% accuracy gains. Combining this permutation strategy with Chain-of-Thought further improves performance to 6.74%. These results expose blind spots in current LALMs and provide a foundation for evaluating complex auditory comprehension.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

ALICE: A Multifaceted Evaluation Framework of Large Audio-Language Models' In-Context Learning Ability

While Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have been shown to exhibit degraded instruction-following capabilities, their ability to infer task patterns from in-context examples under audio conditioning remains unstudied. To address this gap, we present ALICE, a three-stage framework that progressively reduces textual guidance to systematically evaluate LALMs' in-context learning ability under audio conditioning. Evaluating six LALMs across four audio understanding tasks under two output constraint categories, we uncover a consistent asymmetry across all stages and LALMs: in-context demonstrations reliably improve format compliance but fail to improve, and often degrade, the core task performance. This suggests that LALMs can glean surface-level formatting patterns from demonstrations but may struggle to leverage cross-modal semantic grounding to reliably infer task objectives from audio-conditioned examples, highlighting potential limitations in current cross-modal integration.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

SAKE: Towards Editing Auditory Attribute Knowledge of Large Audio-Language Models

Knowledge editing enables targeted updates without retraining, but prior work focuses on textual or visual facts, leaving abstract auditory perceptual knowledge underexplored. We introduce SAKE, the first benchmark for editing perceptual auditory attribute knowledge in large audio-language models (LALMs), which requires modifying acoustic generalization rather than isolated facts. We evaluate eight diverse editing methods on three LALMs across reliability, generality, locality, and portability, under single and sequential edits. Results show that most methods enforce edits reliably but struggle with auditory generalization, intra-attribute locality, and multimodal knowledge propagation, and often exhibit forgetting or degeneration in sequential editing. Additionally, fine-tuning the modality connector emerges as a more robust and balanced baseline compared with directly editing the LLM backbones. SAKE reveals key limitations of current methods and provides a foundation for developing auditory-specific LALM editing techniques.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2025

SAKURA: On the Multi-hop Reasoning of Large Audio-Language Models Based on Speech and Audio Information

Large audio-language models (LALMs) extend the large language models with multimodal understanding in speech, audio, etc. While their performances on speech and audio-processing tasks are extensively studied, their reasoning abilities remain underexplored. Particularly, their multi-hop reasoning, the ability to recall and integrate multiple facts, lacks systematic evaluation. Existing benchmarks focus on general speech and audio-processing tasks, conversational abilities, and fairness but overlook this aspect. To bridge this gap, we introduce SAKURA, a benchmark assessing LALMs' multi-hop reasoning based on speech and audio information. Results show that LALMs struggle to integrate speech/audio representations for multi-hop reasoning, even when they extract the relevant information correctly, highlighting a fundamental challenge in multimodal reasoning. Our findings expose a critical limitation in LALMs, offering insights and resources for future research.

eess.AS↗