Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Yiannis Karavias

Publications and source records attributed to Yiannis Karavias.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Threshold Regression for Fixed-T Panel Data with Interactive Fixed Effects

This paper develops a new toolbox for estimation and inference in panel data threshold regression models with interactive fixed effects and a fixed number of time periods, T. The toolbox is designed to be simple, accurate and computationally efficient. It is based on a simple least squares style estimator of the model parameters, and includes a number of inferential procedures for testing hypotheses regarding not only the threshold but also other parameters. The new toolbox is applied to study the impact of inflation on economic growth.

econ.EM↗

Threshold Regression in Heterogeneous Panel Data with Interactive Fixed Effects

This paper introduces unit-specific heterogeneity in panel data threshold regression. We develop the asymptotic theory for models with heterogeneous thresholds, heterogeneous slope coefficients, and interactive fixed effects. The estimation methodology employs the Common Correlated Effects approach, which is able to handle heterogeneous parameters while maintaining computational simplicity. We also propose a semi-homogeneous model with heterogeneous slopes but a common threshold, revealing novel mean group estimator convergence rates due to the interaction of heterogeneity with the shrinking threshold assumption. Tests for linearity are provided, as well as a modified information criterion which can select between the fully heterogeneous and semi-homogeneous models. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate the good performance of the new methods in small samples. The new theory is used to examine the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle, showing that threshold nonlinearity with respect to trade openness occurs only in a small subset of countries.

econ.EM↗

Interactive, Grouped and Non-separable Fixed Effects: A Practitioner's Guide to the New Panel Data Econometrics

The past 20 years have brought fundamental advances in modeling unobserved heterogeneity in panel data. Interactive Fixed Effects (IFE) proved to be a foundational framework, generalizing the standard one-way and two-way fixed effects models by allowing the unit-specific unobserved heterogeneity to be interacted with unobserved time-varying common factors, allowing for more general forms of omitted variables. The IFE framework laid the theoretical foundations for other forms of heterogeneity, such as grouped fixed effects (GFE) and non-separable two-way fixed effects (NSTW). The existence of IFE, GFE or NSTW has significant implications for identification, estimation, and inference, leading to the development of many new estimators for panel data models. This paper provides an accessible review of the new estimation methods and their associated diagnostic tests, and offers a guide to empirical practice. In two separate empirical investigations we demonstrate that there is empirical support for the new forms of fixed effects and that the results can differ significantly from those obtained using traditional fixed effects estimators.

econ.EM↗

Testing and Estimating Structural Breaks in Time Series and Panel Data in Stata

Identifying structural change is a crucial step in analysis of time series and panel data. The longer the time span, the higher the likelihood that the model parameters have changed as a result of major disruptive events, such as the 2007--2008 financial crisis and the 2020 COVID--19 outbreak. Detecting the existence of breaks, and dating them is therefore necessary, not only for estimation purposes but also for understanding drivers of change and their effect on relationships. This article introduces a new community contributed command called xtbreak, which provides researchers with a complete toolbox for analysing multiple structural breaks in time series and panel data. xtbreak can detect the existence of breaks, determine their number and location, and provide break date confidence intervals. The new command is used to explore changes in the relationship between COVID--19 cases and deaths in the US, using both aggregate and state level data, and in the relationship between approval ratings and consumer confidence, using a panel of eight countries.

econ.EM↗

Multiple Structural Breaks in Interactive Effects Panel Data and the Impact of Quantitative Easing on Bank Lending

This paper develops a new toolbox for multiple structural break detection in panel data models with interactive effects. The toolbox includes tests for the presence of structural breaks, a break date estimator, and a break date confidence interval. The new toolbox is applied to a large panel of US banks for a period characterized by massive quantitative easing programs aimed at lessening the impact of the global financial crisis and the COVID--19 pandemic. The question we ask is: Have these programs been successful in spurring bank lending in the US economy? The short answer turns out to be: ``No''.

econ.EM↗

Structural Breaks in Interactive Effects Panels and the Stock Market Reaction to COVID-19

Dealing with structural breaks is an important step in most, if not all, empirical economic research. This is particularly true in panel data comprised of many cross-sectional units, such as individuals, firms or countries, which are all affected by major events. The COVID-19 pandemic has affected most sectors of the global economy, and there is by now plenty of evidence to support this. The impact on stock markets is, however, still unclear. The fact that most markets seem to have partly recovered while the pandemic is still ongoing suggests that the relationship between stock returns and COVID-19 has been subject to structural change. It is therefore important to know if a structural break has occurred and, if it has, to infer the date of the break. In the present paper we take this last observation as a source of motivation to develop a new break detection toolbox that is applicable to different sized panels, easy to implement and robust to general forms of unobserved heterogeneity. The toolbox, which is the first of its kind, includes a test for structural change, a break date estimator, and a break date confidence interval. Application to a panel covering 61 countries from January 3 to September 25, 2020, leads to the detection of a structural break that is dated to the first week of April. The effect of COVID-19 is negative before the break and zero thereafter, implying that while markets did react, the reaction was short-lived. A possible explanation for this is the quantitative easing programs announced by central banks all over the world in the second half of March.

econ.EM↗