arXiv subjects

Yigit Ege Bayiz

Publications and source records attributed to Yigit Ege Bayiz.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Pareto Optimal Re-ranking with Semi-Automated Content Credibility Detection

Social media posts often include misinformative or misleading content, diminishing the expected credibility of content feeds. We present an optimization-based method to improve the credibility of news content on social media feeds by refining existing content rankings. This method is based on a dual-objective optimization approach that minimizes the Spearman's footrule distance to the original ranking to maintain the original content order while incorporating an additional linear cost objective to elevate the expected credibility of the content feed. Additionally, we propose a robust semi-automated pipeline for assigning credibility scores to content based on a mixture of retrieval-augmented score assignments and human-generated fact-checks. This semi-automated pipeline helps ground the credibility assignment using human-generated labels while ensuring the algorithm extends to posts with few or no human-generated labels. We showcase our approach through an experimental setup using real-world data collected over X (Twitter), where we assign the credibility scores based on a mixture of user-generated community notes and retrieval augmented generation. The method we present leads to at most 7% deviation in both optimization objectives from the Pareto optimal front with known initial ranking values. Additionally, the algorithm allows for incorporating different measures for source credibility, making it applicable across various social media platforms.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2026

Characterizing Opinion Evolution of Networked LLMs

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly interact with one another in multi-agent systems, from simulations of human discourse to influence operations and fully LLM-driven social platforms. These interactions give rise to new regimes of opinion propagation that are not yet well understood. We investigate whether classical opinion dynamics models, which have long been used to explain how interactions shape collective beliefs in human societies, can capture the behavior of LLM networks. We find that, while naive averaging-style models fail to track LLMs' opinion dynamics, simple modifications yield substantial gains in modeling fidelity. In particular, bias, an innate opinion toward which agents regress, emerges as a significant driver of LLM opinion dynamics, with its inclusion reducing cumulative estimated mean opinion error by up to 88%. We additionally find that these conclusions generalize across model families, discussion topics, and networks.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2025

The Effect of Network Topology on the Equilibria of Influence-Opinion Games

Online social networks exert a powerful influence on public opinion. Adversaries weaponize these networks to manipulate discourse, underscoring the need for more resilient social networks. To this end, we investigate the impact of network connectivity on Stackelberg equilibria in a two-player game to shape public opinion. We model opinion evolution as a repeated competitive influence-propagation process. Players iteratively inject \textit{messages} that diffuse until reaching a steady state, modeling the dispersion of two competing messages. Opinions then update according to the discounted sum of exposure to the messages. This bi-level model captures viral-media correlation effects omitted by standard opinion-dynamics models. To solve the resulting high-dimensional game, we propose a scalable, iterative algorithm based on linear-quadratic regulators that approximates local feedback Stackelberg strategies for players with limited cognition. We analyze how the network topology shapes equilibrium outcomes through experiments on synthetic networks and real Facebook data. Our results identify structural characteristics that improve a network's resilience to adversarial influence, guiding the design of more resilient social networks.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2024

How Media Competition Fuels the Spread of Misinformation

Competition among news sources may encourage some sources to share fake news and misinformation to influence the public. While sharing misinformation may lead to a short-term gain in audience engagement, it may damage the reputation of these sources, resulting in a loss of audience. To understand the rationale behind sharing misinformation, we model the competition as a zero-sum sequential game, where each news source influences individuals based on its credibility-how trustworthy the public perceives it-and the individual's opinion and susceptibility. In this game, news sources can decide whether to share factual information to enhance their credibility or disseminate misinformation for greater immediate attention at the cost of losing credibility. We employ the quantal response equilibrium concept, which accounts for the bounded rationality of human decision-making, allowing for imperfect or probabilistic choices. Our analysis shows that the resulting equilibria for this game reproduce the credibility-bias distribution observed in real-world news sources, with hyper-partisan sources more likely to spread misinformation than centrist ones. It further illustrates that disseminating misinformation can polarize the public. Notably, our model reveals that when one player increases misinformation dissemination, the other player is likely to follow, exacerbating the spread of misinformation. We conclude by discussing potential strategies to mitigate the spread of fake news and promote a more factual and reliable information landscape.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2024

CrediRAG: Network-Augmented Credibility-Based Retrieval for Misinformation Detection in Reddit

Fake news threatens democracy and exacerbates the polarization and divisions in society; therefore, accurately detecting online misinformation is the foundation of addressing this issue. We present CrediRAG, the first fake news detection model that combines language models with access to a rich external political knowledge base with a dense social network to detect fake news across social media at scale. CrediRAG uses a news retriever to initially assign a misinformation score to each post based on the source credibility of similar news articles to the post title content. CrediRAG then improves the initial retrieval estimations through a novel weighted post-to-post network connected based on shared commenters and weighted by the average stance of all shared commenters across every pair of posts. We achieve 11% increase in the F1-score in detecting misinformative posts over state-of-the-art methods. Extensive experiments conducted on curated real-world Reddit data of over 200,000 posts demonstrate the superior performance of CrediRAG on existing baselines. Thus, our approach offers a more accurate and scalable solution to combat the spread of fake news across social media platforms.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2024

Susceptibility of Communities against Low-Credibility Content in Social News Websites

Social news websites, such as Reddit, have evolved into prominent platforms for sharing and discussing news. A key issue on social news websites sites is the formation of echo chambers, which often lead to the spread of highly biased or uncredible news. We develop a method to identify communities within a social news website that are prone to uncredible or highly biased news. We employ a user embedding pipeline that detects user communities based on their stances towards posts and news sources. We then project each community onto a credibility-bias space and analyze the distributional characteristics of each projected community to identify those that have a high risk of adopting beliefs with low credibility or high bias. This approach also enables the prediction of individual users' susceptibility to low credibility content, based on their community affiliation. Our experiments show that latent space clusters effectively indicate the credibility and bias levels of their users, with significant differences observed across clusters -- a $34\%$ difference in the users' susceptibility to low-credibility content and a $8.3\%$ difference in the users' susceptibility to high political bias.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2024

News Source Credibility Assessment: A Reddit Case Study

In the era of social media platforms, identifying the credibility of online content is crucial to combat misinformation. We present the CREDiBERT (CREDibility assessment using Bi-directional Encoder Representations from Transformers), a source credibility assessment model fine-tuned for Reddit submissions focusing on political discourse as the main contribution. We adopt a semi-supervised training approach for CREDiBERT, leveraging Reddit's community-based structure. By encoding submission content using CREDiBERT and integrating it into a Siamese neural network, we significantly improve the binary classification of submission credibility, achieving a 9% increase in F1 score compared to existing methods. Additionally, we introduce a new version of the post-to-post network in Reddit that efficiently encodes user interactions to enhance the binary classification task by nearly 8% in F1 score. Finally, we employ CREDiBERT to evaluate the susceptibility of subreddits with respect to different topics.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

Prebunking Design as a Defense Mechanism Against Misinformation Propagation on Social Networks

The growing reliance on social media for news consumption necessitates effective countermeasures to mitigate the rapid spread of misinformation. Prebunking, a proactive method that arms users with accurate information before they come across false content, has garnered support from journalism and psychology experts. We formalize the problem of optimal prebunking as optimizing the timing of delivering accurate information, ensuring users encounter it before receiving misinformation while minimizing the disruption to user experience. Utilizing a susceptible-infected epidemiological process to model the propagation of misinformation, we frame optimal prebunking as a policy synthesis problem with safety constraints. We then propose a policy that approximates the optimal solution to a relaxed problem. The experiments show that this policy cuts the user experience cost of repeated information delivery in half, compared to delivering accurate information immediately after identifying a misinformation propagation.

cs.SI↗