arXiv subjects

Yingbin Jin

Publications and source records attributed to Yingbin Jin.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

MasDrift: Benchmarking Authorization Preservation Across Multi-Agent Architectures

Multi-agent systems (MAS) decompose long-horizon tasks across supervisors and subagents, but delegated goals do not necessarily carry their original authorization boundaries. Existing safety benchmarks mainly study adversarial compromise, while work on constraint drift lacks controlled architecture-level evaluation. We introduce MasDrift, a benchmark of 600 benign productivity tasks across eight domains. Each task pairs required work with reserved actions. MasDrift compares single-agent, centralized, and decentralized coordination while varying hierarchy depth and peer width, measuring task completion and authorization preservation. Across generic multi-agent conditions, centralized hierarchies achieve 93.9--98.6% task completion versus 85.7--87.0% for peer networks, while unauthorized actions occur in 2.7--19.8% of tasks versus 0.6--0.8%, a gap that widens with hierarchy depth. We further compare two defenses that differ in where authorization evidence resides. One re-anchors every pending call to the original user request. The other carries an attenuated policy along the delegation chain. Re-anchoring reduces unauthorized actions in every model configuration we evaluate, at a cost of 1.6 points of pooled completion. Chain propagation blocks required work instead, forfeiting up to 36.3 points. A heterogeneous case study confirms that the failure follows from coordination rather than model strength. MasDrift exposes a centralization tradeoff and makes authorization preservation a measurable property of MAS design.

cs.MA↗

arXiv2026

AtelierEval: Agentic Evaluation of Humans & LLMs as Text-to-Image Prompters

Text-to-image (T2I) systems increasingly rely on upstream prompters, either humans or multimodal large language models (MLLMs), to translate user intent into detailed prompts. Yet current benchmarks fix the prompt and only evaluate T2I models, leaving the prompting proficiency of this upstream component entirely unmeasured. We introduce AtelierEval, the first unified benchmark that quantifies prompting proficiency across 360 expert-crafted tasks. Grounded in a cognitive view, it spans three task categories and instantiates tasks using a taxonomy of real-world challenges, with a dual interface for both humans and MLLMs. To enable scalable and reliable evaluation, we propose AtelierJudge, a skill-based, memory-augmented agentic evaluator. It produces subjective and objective scores for prompt-image pairs, achieving a Spearman correlation of 0.79 with human experts, approaching human performance. Extensive experiments benchmark 8 MLLMs against 48 human users across 4 T2I backends, validate AtelierEval as a robust diagnostic tool, and reveal the superiority of mimicry over planning, advocating for an image-augmented direction for future prompters. Our work is released to support future research.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

CentaurEval: Benchmarking Human-in-the-Loop Value in Agentic Coding

LLM-powered coding agents are reshaping the development paradigm. However, existing evaluation systems, neither traditional tests for humans nor benchmarks for LLMs, fail to capture this shift, excluding problems that require both human reasoning to guide solutions and AI efficiency for implementation. We introduce CentaurEval, a unified, ecologically valid benchmark for measuring human-in-the-loop value in coding. CentaurEval's core innovation is its "Collaboration-Necessary" problem templates, which are intractable for standalone LLMs or humans, but solvable through effective collaboration. CentaurEval dynamically instantiates tasks from 45 templates, providing a standardized IDE for humans and a reproducible 450-task toolkit for LLMs. We benchmark 45 participants against 5 LLMs under 4 levels of human intervention. Results show that while LLMs or humans alone achieve poor pass rates (0.67% and 18.89%), human-AI collaboration significantly improves to 31.11%. Our analysis reveals an emerging co-reasoning partnership, challenging the traditional human-tool hierarchy by showing that strategic breakthroughs can originate from either humans or AI.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

AudioTrust: Benchmarking the Multifaceted Trustworthiness of Audio Large Language Models

The rapid development and widespread adoption of Audio Large Language Models (ALLMs) demand rigorous evaluation of their trustworthiness. However, existing evaluation frameworks are primarily designed for text and fail to capture vulnerabilities introduced by the acoustic properties of audio. We find that significant trustworthiness risks in ALLMs arise from non-semantic acoustic cues, such as timbre, accent, and background noise, which can be exploited to manipulate model behavior. To address this gap, we propose AudioTrust, the first large-scale and systematic framework for evaluating ALLM trustworthiness under audio-specific risks. AudioTrust covers six key dimensions: fairness, hallucination, safety, privacy, robustness, and authenticition. It includes 26 sub-tasks and a curated dataset of more than 4,420 audio samples collected from real-world scenarios, including daily conversations, emergency calls, and voice assistant interactions, and is specifically designed to probe trustworthiness across multiple dimensions. Our comprehensive evaluation spans 18 experimental settings and uses human-validated automated pipelines to enable objective and scalable assessment of model outputs. Experimental results on 14 state-of-the-art open-source and closed-source ALLMs reveal important limitations and failure boundaries under diverse high-risk audio scenarios, providing critical insights for the secure and trustworthy deployment of future audio models. Our platform and benchmark are publicly available at https://github.com/JusperLee/AudioTrust.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2024

DynamicNER: A Dynamic, Multilingual, and Fine-Grained Dataset for LLM-based Named Entity Recognition

The advancements of Large Language Models (LLMs) have spurred a growing interest in their application to Named Entity Recognition (NER) methods. However, existing datasets are primarily designed for traditional machine learning methods and are inadequate for LLM-based methods, in terms of corpus selection and overall dataset design logic. Moreover, the prevalent fixed and relatively coarse-grained entity categorization in existing datasets fails to adequately assess the superior generalization and contextual understanding capabilities of LLM-based methods, thereby hindering a comprehensive demonstration of their broad application prospects. To address these limitations, we propose DynamicNER, the first NER dataset designed for LLM-based methods with dynamic categorization, introducing various entity types and entity type lists for the same entity in different context, leveraging the generalization of LLM-based NER better. The dataset is also multilingual and multi-granular, covering 8 languages and 155 entity types, with corpora spanning a diverse range of domains. Furthermore, we introduce CascadeNER, a novel NER method based on a two-stage strategy and lightweight LLMs, achieving higher accuracy on fine-grained tasks while requiring fewer computational resources. Experiments show that DynamicNER serves as a robust and effective benchmark for LLM-based NER methods. Furthermore, we also conduct analysis for traditional methods and LLM-based methods on our dataset. Our code and dataset are openly available at https://github.com/Astarojth/DynamicNER.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

BIGbench: A Unified Benchmark for Evaluating Multi-dimensional Social Biases in Text-to-Image Models

Text-to-Image (T2I) generative models are becoming increasingly crucial due to their ability to generate high-quality images, but also raise concerns about social biases, particularly in human image generation. Sociological research has established systematic classifications of bias. Yet, existing studies on bias in T2I models largely conflate different types of bias, impeding methodological progress. In this paper, we introduce BIGbench, a unified benchmark for Biases of Image Generation, featuring a carefully designed dataset. Unlike existing benchmarks, BIGbench classifies and evaluates biases across four dimensions to enable a more granular evaluation and deeper analysis. Furthermore, BIGbench applies advanced multi-modal large language models to achieve fully automated and highly accurate evaluations. We apply BIGbench to evaluate eight representative T2I models and three debiasing methods. Our human evaluation results by trained evaluators from different races underscore BIGbench's effectiveness in aligning images and identifying various biases. Moreover, our study also reveals new research directions about biases with insightful analysis of our results. Our work is openly accessible at https://github.com/BIGbench2024/BIGbench2024/.

cs.CV↗