Yingtao Fang | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

RealBench: A Repo-Level Code Generation Benchmark Aligned with Real-World Software Development Practices

Writing code requires significant time and effort in software development. To automate this process, researchers have made substantial progress using Large Language Models (LLMs) for code generation. Many benchmarks like HumanEval and EvoCodeBench have been created to evaluate LLMs by requiring them to generate code from natural language requirements. However, in enterprise applications and team development, developers typically write code based on structured designs or specifications rather than raw natural language descriptions. This gap between existing benchmarks and real industry development practices means that current benchmark scores may not accurately reflect how much code generation can help automate software development tasks. To address this gap, we propose RealBench, a repository-level code generation benchmark aligned with real-world industry software development practices. Each example includes both natural language requirements and UML diagrams as system design, matching how developers typically receive specifications. Based on the constructed benchmarks, we conduct a systematic evaluation of advanced LLMs' code generation capabilities when provided with structured system designs. The experimental results reveal key insights in current LLMs' capabilities for repo-level code generation aligned with real-world software development practices. First, we notice that regarding repo-level code generation, LLMs show much worse performance and there are significant performance gaps among LLMs. Second, LLMs are good at finding and creating modules defined in UML diagrams, but the quality of generated modules is often poor due to grammar and logic errors. Third, generating the entire repository at once is the best generation strategy on smaller repositories, while generating a complex repository with the module-by-module strategy works better compared to other strategies.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

A Needle in a Haystack: Intent-driven Reusable Artifacts Recommendation with LLMs

In open source software development, the reuse of existing artifacts has been widely adopted to avoid redundant implementation work. Reusable artifacts are considered more efficient and reliable than developing software components from scratch. However, when faced with a large number of reusable artifacts, developers often struggle to find artifacts that can meet their expected needs. To reduce this burden, retrieval-based and learning-based techniques have been proposed to automate artifact recommendations. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown the potential to understand intentions, perform semantic alignment, and recommend usable artifacts. Nevertheless, their effectiveness has not been thoroughly explored. To fill this gap, we construct an intent-driven artifact recommendation benchmark named IntentRecBench, covering three representative open source ecosystems. Using IntentRecBench, we conduct a comprehensive comparative study of five popular LLMs and six traditional approaches in terms of precision and efficiency. Our results show that although LLMs outperform traditional methods, they still suffer from low precision and high inference cost due to the large candidate space. Inspired by the ontology-based semantic organization in software engineering, we propose TreeRec, a feature tree-guided recommendation framework to mitigate these issues. TreeRec leverages LLM-based semantic abstraction to organize artifacts into a hierarchical semantic tree, enabling intent and function alignment and reducing reasoning time. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TreeRec consistently improves the performance of diverse LLMs across ecosystems, highlighting its generalizability and potential for practical deployment.

cs.SE↗