SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Yinhe Peng

Publications and source records attributed to Yinhe Peng.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

A ccc indestructible construction with CH

We introduce a variant of the Kurepa family. We then use one such family to construct a ccc indestructible property associated with a complete coherent Suslin tree $S$. Moreover, in every ccc forcing extension that preserves Suslin of $S$, forcing with $S$ induces a strong negative partition relation.

math.LO

Fragments of Martin's axiom

We show that Martin's axiom for $ω_1$ dense sets is equivalent to its fragment asserting that every ccc poset has the Knaster property K$_3$. On the other hand, we show that the dimension 3 in K$_3$ is in some sense minimal.

math.LO

Noetherianity of polynomial rings up to group actions

Let $k$ be a commutative Noetherian ring, and $k[S]$ the polynomial ring whose indeterminates are parameterized by elements in a set $S$. We show that $k[S]$ is Noetherian up to highly homogenous actions of groups. In particular, there is a special linear order $\leqslant$ on infinite $S$ such that $k[S]$ is Noetherian up to actions of $\mathrm{Aut}(S, \leqslant)$, and the existence of such a linear order for every infinite set is equivalent to the axiom of choice. These Noetherian results are proved via a sheaf theoretic approach based on Artin's theorem, the work of Nagel-Römer, and a classification of highly homogenous groups by Cameron.

math.RT

Distinguishing Martin's axiom from its restrictions

We introduce an iteration of forcing notions satisfying the countable chain condition with minimal damage to a strong coloring. Applying this method, we prove that Martin's axiom is strictly stronger than its restriction to forcing notions satisfying the countable chain condition in all finite powers. Our method shows also the finer distinction, that Martin's axiom is strictly stronger than its restriction to forcing notions whose squares satisfy the countable chain condition.

math.LO

L vector spaces and L fields

We construct in ZFC an L topological vector space -- a topological vector space that is an L space -- and an L field -- a topological field that is an L space. This generalizes results in [5] and [8].

math.GN

MA$_{ω_1}(S)[S]$ does not imply $\mathcal{K}_2$

We construct a model in which MA$_{ω_1}$(S)[S] holds and $\mathcal{K}_2$ fails. This shows that MA$_{ω_1}$(S)[S] does not imply $\mathcal{K}_2$ and answers an old question of Larson and Todorcevic in [3]. We also investigate different strong colorings in models of MA$_{ω_1}$(S)[S].

math.LO

A generalized Cantor theorem in ZF

It is proved in $\mathsf{ZF}$ (without the axiom of choice) that, for all infinite sets $M$, there are no surjections from $ω\times M$ onto $\mathscr{P}(M)$.

math.LO

Some consequences of $\mathrm{TD}$ and $\mathrm{sTD}$

Strongly Turing determinacy, or $\mathrm{sTD}$, says that for any set $A$ of reals, if $\forall x\exists y\geq_T x (y\in A)$, then there is a pointed set $P\subseteq A$. We prove the following consequences of Turing determinacy ($\mathrm{TD}$) and $\mathrm{sTD}$: (1). $\mathrm{ZF+TD}$ implies weakly dependent choice ($\mathrm{wDC}$). (2). $\mathrm{ZF+sTD}$ implies that every set of reals is measurable and has Baire property. (3). $\mathrm{ZF+sTD}$ implies that every uncountable set of reals has a perfect subset. (4). $\mathrm{ZF+sTD}$ implies that for any set of reals $A$ and any $ε>0$, (a) there is a closed set $F\subseteq A$ so that $\mathrm{Dim_H}(F)\geq \mathrm{Dim_H}(A)-ε$. (b) there is a closed set $F\subseteq A$ so that $\mathrm{Dim_P}(F)\geq \mathrm{Dim_P}(A)-ε$.

math.LO

TD implies CCR

Assuming $\mathrm{ZF}$, we prove that Turing determinacy ($\mathrm{TD}$) implies countable choice axiom for sets of reals ($\mathrm{CCR}$).

math.LO