arXiv subjects

Yiping Hong

Publications and source records attributed to Yiping Hong.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Fisher Scoring for Exact Mat\'ern Covariance Estimation through Stable Smoothness Optimization

Gaussian Random Fields (GRFs) with Mat\'ern covariance functions have emerged as a powerful framework for modeling spatial processes due to their flexibility in capturing different features of the spatial field. However, the smoothness parameter is challenging to estimate using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), which involves evaluating the likelihood based on the full covariance matrix of the GRF, due to numerical instability. Moreover, MLE remains computationally prohibitive for large spatial datasets. To address this challenge, we propose the Fisher-BackTracking (Fisher-BT) method, which integrates the Fisher scoring algorithm with a backtracking line search strategy and adopts a series approximation for the modified Bessel function. This method enables an efficient MLE estimation for spatial datasets using the ExaGeoStat high-performance computing framework. Our proposed method not only reduces the number of iterations and accelerates convergence compared to derivative-free optimization methods but also improves the numerical stability of the smoothness parameter estimation. Through simulations and real-data analysis using a soil moisture dataset covering the Mississippi River Basin, we show that the proposed Fisher-BT method achieves accuracy comparable to existing approaches while significantly outperforming derivative-free algorithms such as BOBYQA and Nelder-Mead in terms of computational efficiency and numerical stability.

stat.CO↗

arXiv2023

Efficient Large-scale Nonstationary Spatial Covariance Function Estimation Using Convolutional Neural Networks

Spatial processes observed in various fields, such as climate and environmental science, often occur on a large scale and demonstrate spatial nonstationarity. Fitting a Gaussian process with a nonstationary Mat\'ern covariance is challenging. Previous studies in the literature have tackled this challenge by employing spatial partitioning techniques to estimate the parameters that vary spatially in the covariance function. The selection of partitions is an important consideration, but it is often subjective and lacks a data-driven approach. To address this issue, in this study, we utilize the power of Convolutional Neural Networks (ConvNets) to derive subregions from the nonstationary data. We employ a selection mechanism to identify subregions that exhibit similar behavior to stationary fields. In order to distinguish between stationary and nonstationary random fields, we conducted training on ConvNet using various simulated data. These simulations are generated from Gaussian processes with Mat\'ern covariance models under a wide range of parameter settings, ensuring adequate representation of both stationary and nonstationary spatial data. We assess the performance of the proposed method with synthetic and real datasets at a large scale. The results revealed enhanced accuracy in parameter estimations when relying on ConvNet-based partition compared to traditional user-defined approaches.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2021

Efficiency Assessment of Approximated Spatial Predictions for Large Datasets

Due to the well-known computational showstopper of the exact Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) for large geospatial observations, a variety of approximation methods have been proposed in the literature, which usually require tuning certain inputs. For example, the recently developed Tile Low-Rank approximation (TLR) method involves many tuning parameters, including numerical accuracy. To properly choose the tuning parameters, it is crucial to adopt a meaningful criterion for the assessment of the prediction efficiency with different inputs, which the most commonly-used Mean Square Prediction Error (MSPE) criterion and the Kullback-Leibler Divergence criterion cannot fully describe. In this paper, we present three other criteria, the Mean Loss of Efficiency (MLOE), Mean Misspecification of the Mean Square Error (MMOM), and Root mean square MOM (RMOM), and show numerically that, in comparison with the common MSPE criterion and the Kullback-Leibler Divergence criterion, our criteria are more informative, and thus more adequate to assess the loss of the prediction efficiency by using the approximated or misspecified covariance models. Hence, our suggested criteria are more useful for the determination of tuning parameters for sophisticated approximation methods of spatial model fitting. To illustrate this, we investigate the trade-off between the execution time, estimation accuracy, and prediction efficiency for the TLR method with extensive simulation studies and suggest proper settings of the TLR tuning parameters. We then apply the TLR method to a large spatial dataset of soil moisture in the area of the Mississippi River basin, and compare the TLR with the Gaussian predictive process and the composite likelihood method, showing that our suggested criteria can successfully be used to choose the tuning parameters that can keep the estimation or the prediction accuracy in applications.

stat.ME↗