arXiv subjects

Yonggwan Shin

Publications and source records attributed to Yonggwan Shin.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Model averaging with mixed criteria for estimating high quantiles of extreme values: Application to heavy rainfall

Accurately estimating high quantiles beyond the largest observed value is crucial for risk assessment and devising effective adaptation strategies to prevent a greater disaster. The generalized extreme value distribution is widely used for this purpose, with L-moment estimation (LME) and maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) being the primary methods. However, estimating high quantiles with a small sample size becomes challenging when the upper endpoint is unbounded, or equivalently, when there are larger uncertainties involved in extrapolation. This study introduces an improved approach using a model averaging (MA) technique. The proposed method combines MLE and LME to construct candidate submodels and assign weights effectively. The properties of the proposed approach are evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations and an application to maximum daily rainfall data in Korea. In addition, theoretical properties of the MA estimator are examined, including the asymptotic variance with random weights. A surrogate model of MA estimation is also developed and applied for further analysis. Finally, a Bayesian model averaging approach is considered to reduce the estimation bias occurring in the MA methods.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

Generalized method of L-moment estimation for stationary and nonstationary extreme value models

Precisely estimating out-of-sample upper quantiles is very important in risk assessment and in engineering practice for structural design to prevent a greater disaster. For this purpose, the generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution has been broadly used. To estimate the parameters of GEV distribution, the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and L-moment estimation (LME) methods have been primarily employed. For a better estimation using the MLE, several studies considered the generalized MLE (penalized likelihood or Bayesian) methods to cooperate with a penalty function or prior information for parameters. However, a generalized LME method for the same purpose has not been developed yet in the literature. We thus propose the generalized method of L-moment estimation (GLME) to cooperate with a penalty function or prior information. The proposed estimation is based on the generalized L-moment distance and a multivariate normal likelihood approximation. Because the L-moment estimator is more efficient and robust for small samples than the MLE, we reasonably expect the advantages of LME to continue to hold for GLME. The proposed method is applied to the stationary and nonstationary GEV models with two novel (data-adaptive) penalty functions to correct the bias of LME. A simulation study indicates that the biases of LME are considerably corrected by the GLME with slight increases in the standard error. Applications to US flood damage data and maximum rainfall at Phliu Agromet in Thailand illustrate the usefulness of the proposed method. This study may promote further work on penalized or Bayesian inferences based on L-moments.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

Building nonstationary extreme value model using L-moments

The maximum likelihood estimation for a time-dependent nonstationary (NS) extreme value model is often too sensitive to influential observations, such as large values toward the end of a sample. Thus, alternative methods using L-moments have been developed in NS models to address this problem while retaining the advantages of the stationary L-moment method. However, one method using L-moments displays inferior performance compared to stationary estimation when the data exhibit a positive trend in variance. To address this problem, we propose a new algorithm for efficiently estimating the NS parameters. The proposed method combines L-moments and robust regression, using standardized residuals. A simulation study demonstrates that the proposed method overcomes the mentioned problem. The comparison is conducted using conventional and redefined return level estimates. An application to peak streamflow data in Trehafod in the UK illustrates the usefulness of the proposed method. Additionally, we extend the proposed method to a NS extreme value model in which physical covariates are employed as predictors. Furthermore, we consider a model selection criterion based on the cross-validated generalized L-moment distance as an alternative to the likelihood-based criteria.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2020

Integration of max-stable processes and Bayesian model averaging to predict extreme climatic events in multi-model ensembles

Projections of changes in extreme climate are sometimes predicted by using multi-model ensemble methods such as Bayesian model averaging (BMA) embedded with the generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution. BMA is a popular method for combining the forecasts of individual simulation models by weighted averaging and characterizing the uncertainty induced by simulating the model structure. This method is referred to as the GEV-embedded BMA. It is, however, based on a point-wise analysis of extreme events, which means it overlooks the spatial dependency between nearby grid cells. Instead of a point-wise model, a spatial extreme model such as the max-stable process (MSP) is often employed to improve precision by considering spatial dependency. We propose an approach that integrates the MSP into BMA, which is referred to as the MSP-BMA herein. The superiority of the proposed method over the GEV-embedded BMA is demonstrated by using extreme rainfall intensity data on the Korean peninsula from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) multi-models. The reanalysis data called APHRODITE (Asian Precipitation Highly-Resolved Observational Data Integration Towards Evaluation, v1101) and 17 CMIP5 models are examined for 10 grid boxes in Korea. In this example, the MSP-BMA achieves a variance reduction over the GEV-embedded BMA. The bias inflation by MSP-BMA over the GEV-embedded BMA is also discussed. A by-product technical advantage of the MSP-BMA is that tedious `regridding' is not required before and after the analysis while it should be done for the GEV-embedded BMA.

stat.AP↗