Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Yu Dian Lim

Publications and source records attributed to Yu Dian Lim.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Machine Learning-Driven Design of Mixed-Pitch Grating Couplers for Co-Packaged Optics Applications

A mixed-pitch grating coupler which can couple a wide range of wavelengths is preferred in its application in co-packaged optics (CPO). However, the design and optimization of such grating coupler is complex. In this work, we developed software with integrated deep neural network (DNN) model to automatically design the mixed-pitch grating coupler from user-specified peak wavelengths and full-width half-maximum (FWHM) values. We first trained the DNN model with 10,000 rows of grating parameters-power spectrum datasets, where the power spectrum was simulated using finite-difference time domain (FDTD) technique. Upon training, we tested the model using ~1,000 different combinations of peak wavelengths and FWHM values. Among the combinations, 822 attempts have <15% error, while 351 attempts have <5% error when comparing the user-specified and FDTD-verified spectrum. Meanwhile, comparing the user-specified and FDTD-verified peak wavelengths, 844 attempts have peak wavelengths with absolute error (AE) < 2 nm. For FWHMs, 738 attempts have FWHM values with AE < 10 nm. We have also developed a graphical-user interface (GUI) to ease the usage of this software.

physics.optics↗
arXiv2025

AI-Designed Photonics Gratings with Experimental Verification

Artificial Intelligence (AI) software based on transformer model is developed to automatically design gratings for possible integrations in ion traps to perform optical addressing on ions. From the user-defined (x,z) coordinates and full-width half-maximum (FWHM) values, the AI software can automatically generate the Graphic Design System (GDS) layout of the grating that shoots light towards the pre-defined (x,z) coordinates with built-in finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulation for performance verification. Based on the FDTD verification, AI-design gratings produced grating-to-free-space light that shoots towards the provided (x,z) target with < 2 micron deviations. For most attempts, the FWHM of FDTD simulation has < 2 micron deviations from the user-defined FWHM. The AI-designed gratings were successfully taped out and capable of producing output light for possible optical addressing of trapped ions.

physics.optics↗
arXiv2024

Real-time Detection and Auto focusing of Beam Profiles from Silicon Photonics Gratings using YOLO model

When observing the chip-to-free-space light beams from silicon photonics (SiPh) to free-space, manual adjustment of camera lens is often required to obtain a focused image of the light beams. In this letter, we demonstrated an auto-focusing system based on you-only-look-once (YOLO) model. The trained YOLO model exhibits high classification accuracy of 99.7% and high confidence level >0.95 when detecting light beams from SiPh gratings. A video demonstration of real-time light beam detection, real-time computation of beam width, and auto focusing of light beams are also included.

eess.IV↗
arXiv2024

Recognizing Beam Profiles from Silicon Photonics Gratings using Transformer Model

Over the past decade, there has been extensive work in developing integrated silicon photonics (SiPh) gratings for the optical addressing of trapped ion qubits in the ion trap quantum computing community. However, when viewing beam profiles from infrared (IR) cameras, it is often difficult to determine the corresponding heights where the beam profiles are located. In this work, we developed transformer models to recognize the corresponding height categories of beam profiles of light from SiPh gratings. The model is trained using two techniques: (1) input patches, and (2) input sequence. For model trained with input patches, the model achieved recognition accuracy of 0.938. Meanwhile, model trained with input sequence shows lower accuracy of 0.895. However, when repeating the model-training 150 cycles, model trained with input patches shows inconsistent accuracy ranges between 0.445 to 0.959, while model trained with input sequence exhibit higher accuracy values between 0.789 to 0.936. The obtained outcomes can be expanded to various applications, including auto-focusing of light beam and auto-adjustment of z-axis stage to acquire desired beam profiles.

physics.optics↗