arXiv subjects

Yuanli Pei

Publications and source records attributed to Yuanli Pei.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

The Differential Reasoning Router: Operationalizing Cost-Aware LLM Annotation in E-commerce

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to annotate structured product data in e-commerce, but early deployment often begins as a cold-start problem: only limited pre-launch labels are available, the value of expensive reasoning is unknown, and human review is needed before the system can be trusted at scale. This challenge is especially common in rule-based annotation workflows, where each item must satisfy multiple business rules and both model errors and ambiguous rule boundaries affect final decisions. We introduce the Differential Reasoning Router (DRR), a cost-aware framework for cold-start LLM annotation that jointly optimizes model selection and human escalation. Rather than treating a reasoning model as a default fallback, DRR estimates separate success probabilities for a direct model and a reasoning model at both the sample and business-rule levels, enabling adaptive routing: easy cases are handled directly, reasoning is reserved for cases where it is expected to improve the decision, and likely double-failure or rule-disagreement cases are escalated to human annotators. The resulting labels provide targeted ground truth for prompt engineering, supervised fine-tuning, calibration, and rule refinement, enabling a gradual shift from human-heavy cold-start annotation toward high-confidence automated routing. In a production e-commerce workflow, DRR reaches accuracy parity with the strongest confidence-based router while achieving more than 60\% reasoning-token cost savings.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

From Pixels to Purchase: Building and Evaluating a Taxonomy-Decoupled Visual Search Engine for Home Goods E-commerce

Visual search is critical for e-commerce, especially in style-driven domains where user intent is subjective and open-ended. Existing industrial systems typically couple object detection with taxonomy-based classification and rely on catalog data for evaluation, which is prone to noise that limits robustness and scalability. We propose a taxonomy-decoupled architecture that uses classification-free region proposals and unified embeddings for similarity retrieval, enabling a more flexible and generalizable visual search. To overcome the evaluation bottleneck, we propose an LLM-as-a-Judge framework that assesses nuanced visual similarity and category relevance for query-result pairs in a zero-shot manner, removing dependence on human annotations or noise-prone catalog data. Deployed at scale on a global home goods platform, our system improves retrieval quality and yields a measurable uplift in customer engagement, while our offline evaluation metrics strongly correlate with real-world outcomes.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2014

Discriminative Clustering with Relative Constraints

We study the problem of clustering with relative constraints, where each constraint specifies relative similarities among instances. In particular, each constraint $(x_i, x_j, x_k)$ is acquired by posing a query: is instance $x_i$ more similar to $x_j$ than to $x_k$? We consider the scenario where answers to such queries are based on an underlying (but unknown) class concept, which we aim to discover via clustering. Different from most existing methods that only consider constraints derived from yes and no answers, we also incorporate don't know responses. We introduce a Discriminative Clustering method with Relative Constraints (DCRC) which assumes a natural probabilistic relationship between instances, their underlying cluster memberships, and the observed constraints. The objective is to maximize the model likelihood given the constraints, and in the meantime enforce cluster separation and cluster balance by also making use of the unlabeled instances. We evaluated the proposed method using constraints generated from ground-truth class labels, and from (noisy) human judgments from a user study. Experimental results demonstrate: 1) the usefulness of relative constraints, in particular when don't know answers are considered; 2) the improved performance of the proposed method over state-of-the-art methods that utilize either relative or pairwise constraints; and 3) the robustness of our method in the presence of noisy constraints, such as those provided by human judgement.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2014

Active Metric Learning from Relative Comparisons

This work focuses on active learning of distance metrics from relative comparison information. A relative comparison specifies, for a data point triplet $(x_i,x_j,x_k)$, that instance $x_i$ is more similar to $x_j$ than to $x_k$. Such constraints, when available, have been shown to be useful toward defining appropriate distance metrics. In real-world applications, acquiring constraints often require considerable human effort. This motivates us to study how to select and query the most useful relative comparisons to achieve effective metric learning with minimum user effort. Given an underlying class concept that is employed by the user to provide such constraints, we present an information-theoretic criterion that selects the triplet whose answer leads to the highest expected gain in information about the classes of a set of examples. Directly applying the proposed criterion requires examining $O(n^3)$ triplets with $n$ instances, which is prohibitive even for datasets of moderate size. We show that a randomized selection strategy can be used to reduce the selection pool from $O(n^3)$ to $O(n)$, allowing us to scale up to larger-size problems. Experiments show that the proposed method consistently outperforms two baseline policies.

cs.LG↗