YueMing Zhang | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Cross-Model LLM Code Review: Should you use Claude to review Codex or vice versa?

Developers increasingly use two coding agents together: one writes a draft, and the other reviews it. However, it is not clear whether the pairing is worth its cost and time, or whether the order of the pairing matters. We run a controlled experiment on 116 recent hard and medium lcb tasks with Claude and Codex across six conditions to approximate a software practitioner's workflow: both solo baselines, both cross-model orderings, and both same-model orderings. The reviewer sees the problem and the writer's draft but cannot execute tests, which approximates a code review step. Claude review raises Codex drafts from 71.6% to 89.7% ($p_{BH}=.001$); Codex self review raises them to 84.5% ($p_{BH}=.022$). The reverse direction does not pay off: Codex reviewing Claude drafts drops the pass rate from 91.4% to 82.8% ($p_{BH}=.046$), and Claude self review leaves the 91.4% baseline unchanged. Our evaluation indicates that the useful pairing is asymmetric: use Claude to review Codex, not the other way around.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

SwiftBot: A Decentralized Platform for LLM-Powered Federated Robotic Task Execution

Federated robotic task execution systems require bridging natural language instructions to distributed robot control while efficiently managing computational resources across heterogeneous edge devices without centralized coordination. Existing approaches face three limitations: rigid hand-coded planners requiring extensive domain engineering, centralized coordination that contradicts federated collaboration as robots scale, and static resource allocation failing to share containers across robots when workloads shift dynamically. We present SwiftBot, a federated task execution platform that integrates LLM-based task decomposition with intelligent container orchestration over a DHT overlay, enabling robots to collaboratively execute tasks without centralized control. SwiftBot achieves 94.3% decomposition accuracy across diverse tasks, reduces task startup latency by 1.5-5.4x and average training latency by 1.4-2.5x, and improves tail latency by 1.2-4.7x under high load through federated warm container migration. Evaluation on multimedia tasks validates that co-designing semantic understanding and federated resource management enables both flexibility and efficiency for robotic task control.

cs.RO↗