SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Yuhui Shen

Publications and source records attributed to Yuhui Shen.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Whittaker Category and Finite W-superalgebras for Cartan Type Lie Superalgebras

Let $W(n)$ be the finite-dimensional simple Lie superalgebra of fundamental type in the Cartan type series of Kac's classification result \cite{Kac77} over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$. Let $\mathbf{g}$ be the graded-zero part of $W(n)$ which is isomorphic to $\mathfrak{gl}(n)$. In the first part of this paper, following the basic idea of taking the ``minimal" parabolic subalgebra $\mathsf{P}$ as a working platform in \cite{DSY} we introduce the Whittaker category $\mscrw$ for representations of $W(n)$ associated with a nilpotent element $e$ in $\mathbf{g}_0$ and with $W(n)_{-1}$. This Whittaker category turns out to be close to the classical Whittaker category McDowell and Mili\v{c}i\'{c}-Soergel studied in \cite{Mc} and \cite{MS}, respectively (or see \cite{Back}). We finally classify the simple objects in $\mscrw$. In the second part, we introduce the finite $W$-algebra associated with $e$, we then establish a generalized Skryabin's equivalence between the representation category of the finite $W$-superalgebra and the category $\mscrw'$ of so-called weakened Whittaker modules over $W(n)$. Here $\mscrw'$ naturally contains $\mscrw$ as a full subcategory.

math.RT

Coxeter Graphs for Super Weyl Groups of Exceptional Classical Lie Superalgebras

Super Weyl group plays an important role in the study of representations of basic classical Lie superalgebras. The Coxeter graphs for super Weyl groups of basis classical Lie superalgebras have been given in \cite{CLS}, where the authors also made a proposal on the Coxeter graphs for the super Weyl groups of exceptional classical Lie superalgebras $D(2,1,\alpha)$, $F(4)$ and $G(3)$. In this paper, we present all fundamental systems of the exceptional Lie superalgebras and get the Coxeter graphs for the corresponding super Weyl groups, verifying a proposal in \cite{CLS}.

math.RT