Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Yunfeng Shu

Publications and source records attributed to Yunfeng Shu.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

MemU-Bench: Benchmarking GUI Agents on Long-Horizon User Interactions

Existing Graphical User Interface (GUI) benchmarks predominantly rely on precise and stateless user instructions. In everyday usage, however, instructions are often \emph{vague and history-dependent}: users omit the exact details of their past operations because they no longer remember them, leaving the agent to recover the missing context from long and noisy interaction histories. To bridge this evaluation gap, we introduce \textbf{MemU-Bench}, a mobile benchmark of \textbf{118 vague tasks} grounded in 29 long-horizon user trajectories, where agents must distill raw interaction streams into memory and retrieve the missing context on demand, with task outcomes verified against serialized application databases. Alongside Success Rate, we incorporate Interaction Efficiency (IE) and Success weighted by Path Length (SPL) to expose agents that succeed by exhaustively searching across different applications rather than by \emph{genuinely recalling} the history. Evaluations show that without user history, state-of-the-art systems struggle under such ambiguity: the best-performing Gemini-3.1-Pro achieves an SPL of only 16.4\%, and end-to-end GUI agents fall below 5\%. To address this, we further propose \textbf{AppMem}, a training-free framework that distills user history into a \emph{structured, app-centric} memory bank, tracks interrupted intents across application switches, and selectively retrieves relevant memories via target-app inference. AppMem raises the SPL of GPT-5.5 from 15.7\% to 66.9\% (\textbf{+51.2\%}), outperforms a naive summary baseline by 9.3\%, and delivers consistent gains across evaluated backbones.

cs.AI↗

CritiqueCrew: Orchestrating Multi-Perspective Conversational Design Critique

UI designers face growing cognitive load and cross functional friction at the intersection of user needs, business goals, and engineering constraints. Existing automated tools often deliver static "problem lists", lacking actionable repair paths and disrupting creative flow. We introduce CritiqueCrew, a Figma tool that supports designers through conversational critique. CritiqueCrew generates multi-faceted insights by implementing a multi-perspective orchestration of distinct expert roles (UX, PM, Engineer). It translates abstract critiques into concrete actions via in context feedback and interactive remediation. Across two independent controlled studies (Total N=48), CritiqueCrew significantly improved both design quality and subjective experience compared to a traditional static checker. Furthermore, our results confirm that the structured orchestration of expert roles-rather than a unified model-is key to fostering trust and creativity support. Our work demonstrates how AI can shift from a "problem auditor" to a "solution co-creator" by integrating multi-perspective dialogue with interactive repair, offering design implications for future creative tools.

cs.HC↗