SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Yuqiao Zeng

Publications and source records attributed to Yuqiao Zeng.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Label What Matters: Modality-Balanced and Difficulty-Aware Multimodal Active Learning

Multimodal learning integrates complementary information from different modalities such as image, text, and audio to improve model performance, but its success relies on large-scale labeled data, which is costly to obtain. Active learning (AL) mitigates this challenge by selectively annotating informative samples. In multimodal settings, many approaches implicitly assume that modality importance is stable across rounds and keep selection rules fixed at the fusion stage, which leaves them insensitive to the dynamic nature of multimodal learning, where the relative value of modalities and the difficulty of instances shift as training proceeds. To address this issue, we propose RL-MBA, a reinforcement-learning framework for modality-balanced, difficulty-aware multimodal active learning. RL-MBA models sample selection as a Markov Decision Process, where the policy adapts to modality contributions, uncertainty, and diversity, and the reward encourages accuracy gains and balance. Two key components drive this adaptability: (1) Adaptive Modality Contribution Balancing (AMCB), which dynamically adjusts modality weights via reinforcement feedback, and (2) Evidential Fusion for DifficultyAware Policy Adjustment (EFDA), which estimates sample difficulty via uncertainty-based evidential fusion to prioritize informative samples. Experiments on Food101, KineticsSound, and VGGSound demonstrate that RL-MBA consistently outperforms strong baselines, improving both classification accuracy and modality fairness under limited labeling budgets.

cs.CV

CausalT5k: Diagnosing Refusal and Failure Modes in Trustworthy Causal Reasoning Across Causal Rungs

Large language models increasingly produce fluent causal explanations, yet they often fail in ways aggregate accuracy cannot diagnose: confusing association with intervention, abandoning correct judgments under pressure, over-refusing valid claims, or answering when evidence is underdetermined. We introduce CTK, a diagnostic benchmark of 5,147 cases and growing, across 10 domains and all three levels of Pearl's Ladder of Causation. Unlike benchmarks that only score correctness, CTK reveals why a model failed by annotating causal rung, trap type, pressure sensitivity, refusal quality, and Utility-Safety tradeoffs. Its Sheep/Wolf taxonomy separates valid causal designs from inferential traps; paired neutral/pressure variants measure sycophantic drift through Bad Flip Rate; and Wise Refusal fields test whether a model identifies the missing information needed before endorsing a claim. CTK exposes failure modes hidden by aggregate accuracy: the Skepticism Trap, Rung Collapse under scaling, pressure-induced drift, Detection-Correction gaps, and counterfactual error modes. Rather than prescribing a correction method, it provides the diagnostic substrate for studying causal-reasoning failure profiles.

cs.AI

Blur the Linguistic Boundary: Interpreting Chinese Buddhist Sutra in English via Neural Machine Translation

Buddhism is an influential religion with a long-standing history and profound philosophy. Nowadays, more and more people worldwide aspire to learn the essence of Buddhism, attaching importance to Buddhism dissemination. However, Buddhist scriptures written in classical Chinese are obscure to most people and machine translation applications. For instance, general Chinese-English neural machine translation (NMT) fails in this domain. In this paper, we proposed a novel approach to building a practical NMT model for Buddhist scriptures. The performance of our translation pipeline acquired highly promising results in ablation experiments under three criteria.

cs.CL