arXiv subjects

Yury Makarychev

Publications and source records attributed to Yury Makarychev.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2021

Approximating Fair Clustering with Cascaded Norm Objectives

We introduce the $(p,q)$-Fair Clustering problem. In this problem, we are given a set of points $P$ and a collection of different weight functions $W$. We would like to find a clustering which minimizes the $\ell_q$-norm of the vector over $W$ of the $\ell_p$-norms of the weighted distances of points in $P$ from the centers. This generalizes various clustering problems, including Socially Fair $k$-Median and $k$-Means, and is closely connected to other problems such as Densest $k$-Subgraph and Min $k$-Union. We utilize convex programming techniques to approximate the $(p,q)$-Fair Clustering problem for different values of $p$ and $q$. When $p\geq q$, we get an $O(k^{(p-q)/(2pq)})$, which nearly matches a $k^{Ω((p-q)/(pq))}$ lower bound based on conjectured hardness of Min $k$-Union and other problems. When $q\geq p$, we get an approximation which is independent of the size of the input for bounded $p,q$, and also matches the recent $O((\log n/(\log\log n))^{1/p})$-approximation for $(p, \infty)$-Fair Clustering by Makarychev and Vakilian (COLT 2021).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Correlation Clustering with Asymmetric Classification Errors

In the Correlation Clustering problem, we are given a weighted graph $G$ with its edges labeled as "similar" or "dissimilar" by a binary classifier. The goal is to produce a clustering that minimizes the weight of "disagreements": the sum of the weights of "similar" edges across clusters and "dissimilar" edges within clusters. We study the correlation clustering problem under the following assumption: Every "similar" edge $e$ has weight $\mathbf{w}_e\in[α\mathbf{w}, \mathbf{w}]$ and every "dissimilar" edge $e$ has weight $\mathbf{w}_e\geq α\mathbf{w}$ (where $α\leq 1$ and $\mathbf{w}>0$ is a scaling parameter). We give a $(3 + 2 \log_e (1/α))$ approximation algorithm for this problem. This assumption captures well the scenario when classification errors are asymmetric. Additionally, we show an asymptotically matching Linear Programming integrality gap of $Ω(\log 1/α)$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Local Correlation Clustering with Asymmetric Classification Errors

In the Correlation Clustering problem, we are given a complete weighted graph $G$ with its edges labeled as "similar" and "dissimilar" by a noisy binary classifier. For a clustering $\mathcal{C}$ of graph $G$, a similar edge is in disagreement with $\mathcal{C}$, if its endpoints belong to distinct clusters; and a dissimilar edge is in disagreement with $\mathcal{C}$ if its endpoints belong to the same cluster. The disagreements vector, $\text{dis}$, is a vector indexed by the vertices of $G$ such that the $v$-th coordinate $\text{dis}_v$ equals the weight of all disagreeing edges incident on $v$. The goal is to produce a clustering that minimizes the $\ell_p$ norm of the disagreements vector for $p\geq 1$. We study the $\ell_p$ objective in Correlation Clustering under the following assumption: Every similar edge has weight in the range of $[α\mathbf{w},\mathbf{w}]$ and every dissimilar edge has weight at least $α\mathbf{w}$ (where $α\leq 1$ and $\mathbf{w}>0$ is a scaling parameter). We give an $O\left((\frac{1}α)^{\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2p}}\cdot \log\frac{1}α\right)$ approximation algorithm for this problem. Furthermore, we show an almost matching convex programming integrality gap.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Approximation Algorithms for Socially Fair Clustering

We present an $(e^{O(p)} \frac{\log \ell}{\log\log\ell})$-approximation algorithm for socially fair clustering with the $\ell_p$-objective. In this problem, we are given a set of points in a metric space. Each point belongs to one (or several) of $\ell$ groups. The goal is to find a $k$-medians, $k$-means, or, more generally, $\ell_p$-clustering that is simultaneously good for all of the groups. More precisely, we need to find a set of $k$ centers $C$ so as to minimize the maximum over all groups $j$ of $\sum_{u \text{ in group }j} d(u,C)^p$. The socially fair clustering problem was independently proposed by Ghadiri, Samadi, and Vempala [2021] and Abbasi, Bhaskara, and Venkatasubramanian [2021]. Our algorithm improves and generalizes their $O(\ell)$-approximation algorithms for the problem. The natural LP relaxation for the problem has an integrality gap of $Ω(\ell)$. In order to obtain our result, we introduce a strengthened LP relaxation and show that it has an integrality gap of $Θ(\frac{\log \ell}{\log\log\ell})$ for a fixed $p$. Additionally, we present a bicriteria approximation algorithm, which generalizes the bicriteria approximation of Abbasi et al. [2021].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Performance of Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform for k-Means and k-Medians Clustering

Consider an instance of Euclidean $k$-means or $k$-medians clustering. We show that the cost of the optimal solution is preserved up to a factor of $(1+\varepsilon)$ under a projection onto a random $O(\log(k / \varepsilon) / \varepsilon^2)$-dimensional subspace. Further, the cost of every clustering is preserved within $(1+\varepsilon)$. More generally, our result applies to any dimension reduction map satisfying a mild sub-Gaussian-tail condition. Our bound on the dimension is nearly optimal. Additionally, our result applies to Euclidean $k$-clustering with the distances raised to the $p$-th power for any constant $p$. For $k$-means, our result resolves an open problem posed by Cohen, Elder, Musco, Musco, and Persu (STOC 2015); for $k$-medians, it answers a question raised by Kannan.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2018

Robust algorithms with polynomial loss for near-unanimity CSPs

An instance of the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) is given by a family of constraints on overlapping sets of variables, and the goal is to assign values from a fixed domain to the variables so that all constraints are satisfied. In the optimization version, the goal is to maximize the number of satisfied constraints. An approximation algorithm for CSP is called robust if it outputs an assignment satisfying a $(1-g(\varepsilon))$-fraction of constraints on any $(1-\varepsilon)$-satisfiable instance, where the loss function $g$ is such that $g(\varepsilon)\rightarrow 0$ as $\varepsilon\rightarrow 0$. We study how the robust approximability of CSPs depends on the set of constraint relations allowed in instances, the so-called constraint language. All constraint languages admitting a robust polynomial-time algorithm (with some $g$) have been characterised by Barto and Kozik, with the general bound on the loss $g$ being doubly exponential, specifically $g(\varepsilon)=O((\log\log(1/\varepsilon))/\log(1/\varepsilon))$. It is natural to ask when a better loss can be achieved: in particular, polynomial loss $g(\varepsilon)=O(\varepsilon^{1/k})$ for some constant $k$. In this paper, we consider CSPs with a constraint language having a near-unanimity polymorphism. We give two randomized robust algorithms with polynomial loss for such CSPs: one works for any near-unanimity polymorphism and the parameter $k$ in the loss depends on the size of the domain and the arity of the relations in $Γ$, while the other works for a special ternary near-unanimity operation called dual discriminator with $k=2$ for any domain size. In the latter case, the CSP is a common generalisation of Unique Games with a fixed domain and 2-SAT. In the former case, we use the algebraic approach to the CSP. Both cases use the standard semidefinite programming relaxation for CSP.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2018

Nonlinear Dimension Reduction via Outer Bi-Lipschitz Extensions

We introduce and study the notion of an outer bi-Lipschitz extension of a map between Euclidean spaces. The notion is a natural analogue of the notion of a Lipschitz extension of a Lipschitz map. We show that for every map $f$ there exists an outer bi-Lipschitz extension $f'$ whose distortion is greater than that of $f$ by at most a constant factor. This result can be seen as a counterpart of the classic Kirszbraun theorem for outer bi-Lipschitz extensions. We also study outer bi-Lipschitz extensions of near-isometric maps and show upper and lower bounds for them. Then, we present applications of our results to prioritized and terminal dimension reduction problems. * We prove a prioritized variant of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma: given a set of points $X\subset \mathbb{R}^d$ of size $N$ and a permutation ("priority ranking") of $X$, there exists an embedding $f$ of $X$ into $\mathbb{R}^{O(\log N)}$ with distortion $O(\log \log N)$ such that the point of rank $j$ has only $O(\log^{3 + \varepsilon} j)$ non-zero coordinates - more specifically, all but the first $O(\log^{3+\varepsilon} j)$ coordinates are equal to $0$; the distortion of $f$ restricted to the first $j$ points (according to the ranking) is at most $O(\log\log j)$. The result makes a progress towards answering an open question by Elkin, Filtser, and Neiman about prioritized dimension reductions. * We prove that given a set $X$ of $N$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, there exists a terminal dimension reduction embedding of $\mathbb{R}^d$ into $\mathbb{R}^{d'}$, where $d' = O\left(\frac{\log N}{\varepsilon^4}\right)$, which preserves distances $\|x-y\|$ between points $x\in X$ and $y \in \mathbb{R}^{d}$, up to a multiplicative factor of $1 \pm \varepsilon$. This improves a recent result by Elkin, Filtser, and Neiman. The dimension reductions that we obtain are nonlinear, and this nonlinearity is necessary.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2017

A Union of Euclidean Metric Spaces is Euclidean

Suppose that a metric space $X$ is the union of two metric subspaces $A$ and $B$ that embed into Euclidean space with distortions $D_A$ and $D_B$, respectively. We prove that then $X$ embeds into Euclidean space with a bounded distortion (namely, with distortion at most $7D_A D_B + 2(D_A+D_B)$). Our result settles an open problem posed by Naor. Additionally, we present some corollaries and extensions of this result. In particular, we introduce and study a new concept of an "external bi-Lipschitz extension". In the end of the paper, we list a few related open problems.

math.MG↗

arXiv2016

Minimizing the Union: Tight Approximations for Small Set Bipartite Vertex Expansion

In the Minimum k-Union problem (MkU) we are given a set system with n sets and are asked to select k sets in order to minimize the size of their union. Despite being a very natural problem, it has received surprisingly little attention: the only known approximation algorithm is an $O(\sqrt{n})$-approximation due to [Chlamtáč et al APPROX '16]. This problem can also be viewed as the bipartite version of the Small Set Vertex Expansion problem (SSVE), which we call the Small Set Bipartite Vertex Expansion problem (SSBVE). SSVE, in which we are asked to find a set of k nodes to minimize their vertex expansion, has not been as well studied as its edge-based counterpart Small Set Expansion (SSE), but has recently received significant attention, e.g. [Louis-Makarychev APPROX '15]. However, due to the connection to Unique Games and hardness of approximation the focus has mostly been on sets of size $k = Ω(n)$, while we focus on the case of general $k$, for which no polylogarithmic approximation is known. We improve the upper bound for this problem by giving an $n^{1/4+\varepsilon}$ approximation for SSBVE for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$. Our algorithm follows in the footsteps of Densest $k$-Subgraph (DkS) and related problems, by designing a tight algorithm for random models, and then extending it to give the same guarantee for arbitrary instances. Moreover, we show that this is tight under plausible complexity conjectures: it cannot be approximated better than $O(n^{1/4})$ assuming an extension of the so-called "Dense vs Random" conjecture for DkS to hypergraphs. We show that the same bound is also matched by an integrality gap for a super-constant number of rounds of the Sherali-Adams LP hierarchy, and an even worse integrality gap for the natural SDP relaxation. Finally, we design a simple bicriteria $\tilde O(\sqrt{n})$ approximation for the more general SSVE problem.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2016

Algorithmic and Hardness Results for the Hub Labeling Problem

There has been significant success in designing highly efficient algorithms for distance and shortest-path queries in recent years; many of the state-of-the-art algorithms use the hub labeling framework. In this paper, we study the approximability of the Hub Labeling problem. We prove a hardness of $Ω(\log n)$ for Hub Labeling, matching known approximation guarantees. The hardness result applies to graphs that have multiple shortest paths between some pairs of vertices. No hardness of approximation results were known previously. Then, we focus on graphs that have a unique shortest path between each pair of vertices. This is a very natural family of graphs, and much research on the Hub Labeling problem has studied such graphs. We give an $O(\log D)$ approximation algorithm for graphs of diameter $D$ with unique shortest paths. In particular, we get an $O(\log \log n)$ approximation for graphs of polylogarithmic diameter, while previously known algorithms gave an $O(\log n)$ proximation. Finally, we present a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) and quasi-polynomial time algorithms for Hub Labeling on trees; additionally, we analyze a simple combinatorial heuristic for Hub Labeling on trees, proposed by Peleg in 2000. We show that this heuristic gives an approximation factor of 2.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2016

An Improved Integrality Gap for the Calinescu-Karloff-Rabani Relaxation for Multiway Cut

We construct an improved integrality gap instance for the Calinescu-Karloff-Rabani LP relaxation of the Multiway Cut problem. In particular, for $k \geqslant 3$ terminals, our instance has an integrality ratio of $6 / (5 + \frac{1}{k - 1}) - \varepsilon$, for every constant $\varepsilon > 0$. For every $k \geqslant 4$, our result improves upon a long-standing lower bound of $8 / (7 + \frac{1}{k - 1})$ by Freund and Karloff (2000). Due to Manokaran et al.'s result (2008), our integrality gap also implies Unique Games hardness of approximating Multiway Cut of the same ratio.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2016

Metric Perturbation Resilience

We study the notion of perturbation resilience introduced by Bilu and Linial (2010) and Awasthi, Blum, and Sheffet (2012). A clustering problem is $α$-perturbation resilient if the optimal clustering does not change when we perturb all distances by a factor of at most $α$. We consider a class of clustering problems with center-based objectives, which includes such problems as k-means, k-median, and k-center, and give an exact algorithm for clustering 2-perturbation resilient instances. Our result improves upon the result of Balcan and Liang (2016), who gave an algorithm for clustering $1+\sqrt{2}\approx 2.41$ perturbation resilient instances. Our result is tight in the sense that no polynomial-time algorithm can solve $(2-\varepsilon)$-perturbation resilient instances unless NP = RP, as was shown by Balcan, Haghtalab, and White (2016). We show that the algorithm works on instances satisfying a slightly weaker and more natural condition than perturbation resilience, which we call metric perturbation resilience.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2016

Learning Communities in the Presence of Errors

We study the problem of learning communities in the presence of modeling errors and give robust recovery algorithms for the Stochastic Block Model (SBM). This model, which is also known as the Planted Partition Model, is widely used for community detection and graph partitioning in various fields, including machine learning, statistics, and social sciences. Many algorithms exist for learning communities in the Stochastic Block Model, but they do not work well in the presence of errors. In this paper, we initiate the study of robust algorithms for partial recovery in SBM with modeling errors or noise. We consider graphs generated according to the Stochastic Block Model and then modified by an adversary. We allow two types of adversarial errors, Feige---Kilian or monotone errors, and edge outlier errors. Mossel, Neeman and Sly (STOC 2015) posed an open question about whether an almost exact recovery is possible when the adversary is allowed to add $o(n)$ edges. Our work answers this question affirmatively even in the case of $k>2$ communities. We then show that our algorithms work not only when the instances come from SBM, but also work when the instances come from any distribution of graphs that is $εm$ close to SBM in the Kullback---Leibler divergence. This result also works in the presence of adversarial errors. Finally, we present almost tight lower bounds for two communities.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2015

Satisfiability of Ordering CSPs Above Average

We study the satisfiability of ordering constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) above average. We prove the conjecture of Gutin, van Iersel, Mnich, and Yeo that the satisfiability above average of ordering CSPs of arity $k$ is fixed-parameter tractable for every $k$. Previously, this was only known for $k=2$ and $k=3$. We also generalize this result to more general classes of CSPs, including CSPs with predicates defined by linear inequalities. To obtain our results, we prove a new Bonami-type inequality for the Efron-Stein decomposition. The inequality applies to functions defined on arbitrary product probability spaces. In contrast to other variants of the Bonami Inequality, it does not depend on the mass of the smallest atom in the probability space. We believe that this inequality is of independent interest.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2015

A bi-criteria approximation algorithm for $k$ Means

We consider the classical $k$-means clustering problem in the setting bi-criteria approximation, in which an algoithm is allowed to output $βk > k$ clusters, and must produce a clustering with cost at most $α$ times the to the cost of the optimal set of $k$ clusters. We argue that this approach is natural in many settings, for which the exact number of clusters is a priori unknown, or unimportant up to a constant factor. We give new bi-criteria approximation algorithms, based on linear programming and local search, respectively, which attain a guarantee $α(β)$ depending on the number $βk$ of clusters that may be opened. Our gurantee $α(β)$ is always at most $9 + ε$ and improves rapidly with $β$ (for example: $α(2)<2.59$, and $α(3) < 1.4$). Moreover, our algorithms have only polynomial dependence on the dimension of the input data, and so are applicable in high-dimensional settings.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2015

Correlation Clustering with Noisy Partial Information

In this paper, we propose and study a semi-random model for the Correlation Clustering problem on arbitrary graphs G. We give two approximation algorithms for Correlation Clustering instances from this model. The first algorithm finds a solution of value $(1+ δ) optcost + O_δ(n\log^3 n)$ with high probability, where $optcost$ is the value of the optimal solution (for every $δ> 0$). The second algorithm finds the ground truth clustering with an arbitrarily small classification error $η$ (under some additional assumptions on the instance).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2014

Constant Factor Approximation for Balanced Cut in the PIE model

We propose and study a new semi-random semi-adversarial model for Balanced Cut, a planted model with permutation-invariant random edges (PIE). Our model is much more general than planted models considered previously. Consider a set of vertices V partitioned into two clusters $L$ and $R$ of equal size. Let $G$ be an arbitrary graph on $V$ with no edges between $L$ and $R$. Let $E_{random}$ be a set of edges sampled from an arbitrary permutation-invariant distribution (a distribution that is invariant under permutation of vertices in $L$ and in $R$). Then we say that $G + E_{random}$ is a graph with permutation-invariant random edges. We present an approximation algorithm for the Balanced Cut problem that finds a balanced cut of cost $O(|E_{random}|) + n \text{polylog}(n)$ in this model. In the regime when $|E_{random}| = Ω(n \text{polylog}(n))$, this is a constant factor approximation with respect to the cost of the planted cut.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2014

Clustering, Hamming Embedding, Generalized LSH and the Max Norm

We study the convex relaxation of clustering and hamming embedding, focusing on the asymmetric case (co-clustering and asymmetric hamming embedding), understanding their relationship to LSH as studied by (Charikar 2002) and to the max-norm ball, and the differences between their symmetric and asymmetric versions.

cs.LG↗