SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Zach Pino

Publications and source records attributed to Zach Pino.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Me Among Us: Affective Framing in Data Donation

This study investigates how different framing approaches influence the affective aspects of data donation decision-making. Although framing effects are well studied in charitable giving, how affective framing shapes data donation, especially through data visualization, remains poorly understood. Using a theoretical framework based on the functions of affect in decision-making, we examine how three distinct framing approaches, an individual-donor lens (Group A), an individual-collective lens (Group B), and a collective-institutional lens (Group C), shape participants' affective experiences and subsequent donation decisions. Through a real-world data donation study (N=24), we found that framing designs substantially influenced donation outcomes, with the individual-collective lens generating the most favorable responses. Our analysis illustrates how affect can functions as information, motivation, and as a spotlight during the decision-making process, providing insights for designing more informed data donation interfaces and communications. This research contributes to understanding the complex interplay between framing designs, affective responses, and decision outcomes in data donation contexts.

cs.HC

Framing Data Choices: How Pre-Donation Exploration Designs Influence Data Donation Behavior and Decision-Making

Data donation, an emerging user-centric data collection method for public sector research, faces a gap between participant willingness and actual donation. This suggests a design absence in practice: while promoted as "donor-centered" with technical and regulational advances, a design perspective on how data choices are presented and intervene on individual behaviors remain underexplored. In this paper, we focus on pre-donation data exploration, a key stage for adequately and meaningful informed participation. Through a real-world data donation study (N=24), we evaluated three data exploration interventions (self-focused, social comparison, collective-only). Findings show choice framing impacts donation participation. The "social comparison" design (87.5%) outperformed the "self-focused view" (62.5%) while a "collective-only" frame (37.5%) backfired, causing "perspective confusion" and privacy concerns. This study demonstrates how strategic data framing addresses data donation as a behavioral challenge, revealing design's critical yet underexplored role in data donation for participatory public sector innovation.

cs.HC