arXiv subjects

Zehan Lin

Publications and source records attributed to Zehan Lin.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Logarithmic Comparison-Query Complexity for EF1 Allocations

We study the comparison-query complexity of computing allocations that are envy-free up to one item (EF1) for $n$ agents with heterogeneous additive preferences over $m$ indivisible items. In this model, the algorithm may only query which of two bundles an agent prefers, without ever observing numerical valuations or costs. Prior work established $O(\log m)$ query bounds for at most three agents, leaving open whether query complexity logarithmic in $m$ is achievable for every fixed $n \ge 4$. We resolve this open question in the affirmative: for every fixed $n\ge2$, we design algorithms that compute EF1 allocations using $O(\log m)$ comparison queries, matching the known $Ω(\log m)$ lower bound. Our results hold for both chores with nonnegative costs and goods with nonnegative valuations.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Best-of-Many-Worlds MMS Allocation for Chores with Sublinear Disposals

We study randomized allocations (lotteries) of indivisible chores under additive costs and introduce the notion of MMS1, which requires each agent's bundle to satisfy the maximin share (MMS) bound after the removal of at most one chore. Our main result establishes that every instance admits an ex-ante proportional lottery in whose support every allocation is MMS1 and all but $o(n)$ agents satisfy MMS. Consequently, every realized allocation can be made MMS by disposing of at most $o(n)$ chores. The proposed framework further achieves ex-ante proportionality alongside ex-post $4/3$-MMS, $o(n)$-AMMS, or $1$-out-of-$d$ MMS for $d=(1-o(1))n$. These guarantees substantially improve upon state-of-the-art bounds for MMS allocation for chores with disposal or subsidy, best-of-both-worlds fairness, approximate AMMS, and ordinal MMS approximations.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Truthful-in-Expectation MMS Allocations for Chores

We study truthful-in-expectation (TIE) mechanisms for allocating indivisible chores alongside ex-post maximin share (MMS) guarantees. For goods, Bu and Tao (FOCS 2025) established a (1/n)-approximation for TIE mechanisms, and this was substantially improved by Babaioff, Feige, and Manaker Morag (FOCS 2026), who established an Ω(1/\log n) approximation, where n is the number of agents. The corresponding problem for chores has received less attention. The best-known result is due to Aziz, Li, and Wu (MAPR 2024), who gave a TIE mechanism with an O(\sqrt{\log n}) MMS approximation guarantee that holds only in expectation. They also established a 6/5 lower bound for TIE mechanisms for two agents. In this paper, we present the first TIE mechanism for chores that achieves a constant ex-post MMS approximation guarantee. Specifically, our mechanism guarantees an ex-post ratio of 1.97 for any number of agents n, which improves to 4/3 for n=2 and 3/2 for n=3. On the hardness side, we tighten the two-agent lower bound to 4/3, showing that our mechanism is optimal for n=2. More generally, we establish a lower bound of 13/12 on the ex-post MMS approximation ratio achievable by TIE mechanisms for every n\ge 3.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Revisiting EFX and fPO Allocations for Binary Chores

We study fair and efficient allocations of indivisible chores under binary additive costs, with a focus on unequal entitlements and best-of-both-worlds guarantees. While binary valuations have been extensively studied for goods, their chore counterpart remains much less understood. A notable exception is due to Tao et al. (TCS 2025), who established that EFX and fPO are compatible for binary chores with equal entitlements. We revisit binary chores under unequal entitlements and establish the computation of allocations that satisfy WEFX and fPO. Our key technical contribution is a new lexicographic potential function tailored to chores: any allocation minimizing this potential ensures both WEFX and fPO. This potential further guides a polynomial-time local-search algorithm for computing allocations with such fairness and efficiency guarantees. For best-of-both-worlds guarantees, we show that unequal entitlements create a sharp obstruction: even with two agents and identical binary additive costs, no lottery can simultaneously satisfy ex-ante WEF and ex-post WEF1. In contrast, for equal entitlements, we construct in polynomial time a lottery that is ex-ante EF and fPO, while every realization is both EFX and fPO.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $α$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+ε}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $ε> 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Non-Existence of PMMS Allocations and a $4/3$-PMMS Guarantee for Additive Chores

We study pairwise maximin share (PMMS) fairness for indivisible items with additive preferences. We give a polynomial-time reduction from chores to goods that preserves the existence of a PMMS allocation. Together with known nonexistence results for chores, this yields nonexistence for additive goods. In addition, we show that deciding if a given instance admits a PMMS allocation is NP-hard. We also give explicit instances whose PMMS factors are $226/227$ for goods and $1.102065$ for chores, certified by exact enumeration. Complementing these impossibility results, we prove that every additive-chore instance admits a $4/3$-PMMS allocation.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

When Maximum Nash Welfare Becomes Strongly Fair: Bi-valued Goods

For the fair allocation of indivisible goods, the milestone work of Caragiannis et al. (2019) revolutionized the understanding of Maximum Nash Welfare (MNW) allocations by revealing their "unreasonable" ability to balance fairness (EF1) and efficiency (PO) for general additive functions. Subsequent work established that MNW allocations simultaneously satisfy EFX and GMMS (and consequently MMS and PMMS) for binary instances (Amanatidis et al. 2021 and Barman et al. 2018), and satisfy EFX for bi-valued instances (Amanatidis et al. 2021). In this paper, we revisit the (personalized) bi-valued instances and provide a tight characterization of the approximation guarantees of MNW allocations with respect to EFX, PMMS, and GMMS, showing that these guarantees are significantly stronger than what is known for general valuations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that even for the slightly more general setting of tri-valued instances, the fairness guarantees of MNW deteriorate significantly, which establishes a sharp boundary on the instances for which MNW allocations are strongly fair.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Comparison-Based Fair Division of Indivisible Chores

We investigate the query complexity of fairly allocating $m$ indivisible chores among $n$ agents with additive cost functions. We depart from the standard cardinal model and assume only comparison access: an algorithm may ask an agent which of two bundles is less costly, but never observes numerical costs. Our first results concern proportionality up to one item (PROP1). We design comparison-based algorithms that compute PROP1 allocations using $O(n^3\log m)$ comparison queries. When the chores are arranged in a fixed order and allocations are required to be contiguous, we compute a contiguous PROP1 allocation using $O(n^3 \log^2 m)$ comparison queries. Our main result concerns the maximin share (MMS) guarantee. We show that for any fixed number of agents $n$ and constant $\varepsilon>0$, a $\left(13/11 +\varepsilon\right)$-MMS allocation can be computed with a comparison complexity logarithmic in $m$. Remarkably, comparison access suffices to match the state-of-the-art $13/11$ cardinal-access guarantee of Huang and Segal-Halevi up to an arbitrarily small loss. Furthermore, our result implies that the MMS distortion of comparison access (i.e., the worst-case multiplicative loss in MMS fairness incurred by observing only comparisons rather than numerical costs) is at most $13/11$. Finally, we show that, for three agents, an allocation satisfying envy-freeness up to one item (EF1) can be computed using $O(\log m)$ comparison queries.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Almost Envy-Freeness for Additive Mixed Manna with Entitlements: Deterministic and Randomized Guarantees

We investigate the fair allocation of indivisible items among agents with asymmetric entitlements in mixed manna settings, where the items consist of both goods and chores. For additive valuations, we establish that weighted envy-free up to one item (WEF1) allocations always exist and can be computed in polynomial time. We also study fair and efficient allocation and show that weighted envy-freeness up to one transfer (WEF1T) is compatible with fractional Pareto optimality (fPO) for every mixed-manna instance. This relaxation from WEF1 to WEF1T is tight, as demonstrated by our impossibility result. We further show a best-of-both-worlds result via a finite lottery that guarantees weighted envy-freeness (WEF) in expectation, with every realized allocation satisfying WEF1T and achieving the tight characterization complemented by the existing impossibility result.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Non-Existence of EFX Chore Allocations for Monotone Cost Functions with Binary Marginals

We study the existence of envy-free up to any item (EFX) allocations of indivisible chores when agents have monotone cost functions with binary marginals. For indivisible goods, the corresponding existence question is known to have an affirmative answer for general monotone functions with binary marginals. For chores, however, the existence of EFX allocation was previously known only for more restricted classes, while the general binary-marginal case remained unresolved. In this paper, we provide two counterexamples based on the same 18-agent, 53-chore word gadget, with one cost profile for binary XOS costs and another for binary supermodular costs. In both cases, a complete EFX allocation need not exist. Finally, we formalize and verify our main results in Lean 4.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Allocating Chores with Restricted Additive Costs: Achieving EFX, MMS, and Efficiency Simultaneously

In a web-based review platform, papers from various research fields must be assigned to a group of reviewers. Each paper has an inherent cost, which represents the effort required for reading and evaluating it (e.g., the paper's length). Reviewers can bid on papers they are interested in, and if they are assigned a paper they have bid on, no cost is incurred. Otherwise, the inherent cost $c(e)$ for paper $e$ applies. We capture this with a model of restricted additive costs: every item $e$ has a cost $c(e)$, and each agent either incurs $0$ or $c(e)$ for $e$. In this work, we study how to allocate such chores fairly and efficiently. We propose an algorithm for computing allocations that are both EFX and MMS. Furthermore, we show that our algorithm achieves a $2$-approximation of the optimal social cost, and the approximation ratio is optimal. We also show that slightly weaker fairness guarantees can be obtained if one requires the algorithm to run in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Approximately EFX and PO Allocations for Bivalued Chores

We consider the computation for allocations of indivisible chores that are approximately EFX and Pareto optimal (PO). Recently, Garg et al. (2024) show the existence of $3$-EFX and PO allocations for bi-valued instances, where the cost of an item to an agent is either $1$ or $k$ (where $k > 1$) by rounding the (fractional) earning restricted equilibrium. In this work, we improve the approximation ratio to $(2-1/k)$, while preserving the Pareto optimality. Instead of rounding fractional equilibrium, our algorithm starts with the integral EF1 equilibrium for bi-valued chores, introduced by Garg et al. (AAAI 2022) and Wu et al. (EC 2023), and reallocates items until approximate EFX is achieved. We further improve our result for the case when $k=2$ and devise an algorithm that computes EFX and PO allocations.

cs.GT↗