arXiv subjects

Zeynel Tok

Publications and source records attributed to Zeynel Tok.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

The Nearest Target Is the Wrong One: Target Separation in Arc2Face Identity Unlearning

Unlearning an identity from a face-conditioned generator by redirecting its conditioning embedding can silently fail if the redirected output is still verified as the original person. We show that this failure depends on a controllable choice of how far the redirection target lies from the forget identity in recognition space, and that the most intuitive target, the nearest neighbour, is the one most likely to cause it. We audit Arc2Face with a locked ArcFace protocol and a projection adapter that redirects identity conditioning before generation. On a hard-neighbour stress test built from the hardest 0.5% of eligible identities, four target-selection policies show a monotonic response: clean forgetting rises from 9/30 groups under the nearest hard target to 30/30 under the least similar one. Mean forget-identity re-identification falls from 51.9 to 0.0 while mean retention stays flat. This reflects successful redirection rather than outputs becoming unverifiable: 710 of 720 least-sim-hard generations arrive at the chosen target, with no leakage to unrelated identities. Re-verifying identical images with an independent recogniser (AdaFace) preserves that trend, correlating at r=0.94, arguing against a verifier artefact. Target separation is thus a first-order, reportable design variable for identity unlearning.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

MCJudgeBench: A Benchmark for Constraint-Level Judge Evaluation in Multi-Constraint Instruction Following

Multi-constraint instruction following requires verifying whether a response satisfies multiple individual requirements, yet LLM judges are often assessed only through overall-response judgments. We introduce MCJudgeBench, a benchmark for constraint-level judge evaluation in multi-constraint instruction following. Each instance includes an instruction, a candidate response, an explicit constraint list, per-constraint gold labels in {yes, partial, no}, and controlled response-side perturbations. The evaluation protocol further includes evaluation prompt variants to test judge stability. We evaluate proprietary and open-source LLM judges using both correctness and inconsistency metrics, distinguishing intrinsic inconsistency under stochastic decoding from procedural inconsistency under prompt and response perturbations. Our results show that judge reliability has multiple dimensions: strong overall performance does not guarantee equally reliable detection across label categories, especially for rarer partial and no cases. Judges with higher correctness do not always have lower inconsistency. Evaluation with reasoning improves correctness but does not uniformly improve stability. These findings motivate evaluating LLM judges at the constraint level to study these failure modes.

cs.CL↗