arXiv subjects

Zhangchi Zhao

Publications and source records attributed to Zhangchi Zhao.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Tug-of-War within A Decade: Conflict Resolution in Vulnerability Analysis via Teacher-Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generations

Large Language Models (LLMs) are essential for analyzing and addressing vulnerabilities in cybersecurity. However, among over 200,000 vulnerabilities were discovered in the past decade, more than 30,000 have been changed or updated. This necessitates frequent updates to the training datasets and internal knowledge bases of LLMs to maintain knowledge consistency. In this paper, we focus on the problem of knowledge discrepancy and conflict within CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) detection and analysis. This problem hinders LLMs' ability to retrieve the latest knowledge from original training datasets, leading to knowledge conflicts, fabrications of factually incorrect results, and generation hallucinations. To address this problem, we propose an innovative two-stage framework called CRVA-TGRAG (Conflict Resolution in Vulnerability Analysis via Teacher-Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation). First, to improve document retrieval accuracy during the retrieval stage, we utilize Parent Document Segmentation and an ensemble retrieval scheme based on semantic similarity and inverted indexing. Second, to enhance LLMs' capabilities based on the retrieval of CVE dataset in generation stage, we employ a teacher-guided preference optimization technique to fine-tune LLMs. Our framework not only enhances the quality of content retrieval through RAG but also leverages the advantages of preference fine-tuning in LLMs to answer questions more effectively and precisely. Experiments demonstrate our method achieves higher accuracy in retrieving the latest CVEs compared to external knowledge bases. In conclusion, our framework significantly mitigates potential knowledge conflicts and inconsistencies that may arise from relying solely on LLMs for knowledge retrieval.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

CAPTURE: A Benchmark and Evaluation for LVLMs in CAPTCHA Resolving

Benefiting from strong and efficient multi-modal alignment strategies, Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs) are able to simulate human visual and reasoning capabilities, such as solving CAPTCHAs. However, existing benchmarks based on visual CAPTCHAs still face limitations. Previous studies, when designing benchmarks and datasets, customized them according to their research objectives. Consequently, these benchmarks cannot comprehensively cover all CAPTCHA types. Notably, there is a dearth of dedicated benchmarks for LVLMs. To address this problem, we introduce a novel CAPTCHA benchmark for the first time, named CAPTURE CAPTCHA for Testing Under Real-world Experiments, specifically for LVLMs. Our benchmark encompasses 4 main CAPTCHA types and 25 sub-types from 31 vendors. The diversity enables a multi-dimensional and thorough evaluation of LVLM performance. CAPTURE features extensive class variety, large-scale data, and unique LVLM-tailored labels, filling the gaps in previous research in terms of data comprehensiveness and labeling pertinence. When evaluated by this benchmark, current LVLMs demonstrate poor performance in solving CAPTCHAs.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Improving Memory Efficiency for Training KANs via Meta Learning

Inspired by the Kolmogorov-Arnold representation theorem, KANs offer a novel framework for function approximation by replacing traditional neural network weights with learnable univariate functions. This design demonstrates significant potential as an efficient and interpretable alternative to traditional MLPs. However, KANs are characterized by a substantially larger number of trainable parameters, leading to challenges in memory efficiency and higher training costs compared to MLPs. To address this limitation, we propose to generate weights for KANs via a smaller meta-learner, called MetaKANs. By training KANs and MetaKANs in an end-to-end differentiable manner, MetaKANs achieve comparable or even superior performance while significantly reducing the number of trainable parameters and maintaining promising interpretability. Extensive experiments on diverse benchmark tasks, including symbolic regression, partial differential equation solving, and image classification, demonstrate the effectiveness of MetaKANs in improving parameter efficiency and memory usage. The proposed method provides an alternative technique for training KANs, that allows for greater scalability and extensibility, and narrows the training cost gap with MLPs stated in the original paper of KANs. Our code is available at https://github.com/Murphyzc/MetaKAN.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Can't say cant? Measuring and Reasoning of Dark Jargons in Large Language Models

Ensuring the resilience of Large Language Models (LLMs) against malicious exploitation is paramount, with recent focus on mitigating offensive responses. Yet, the understanding of cant or dark jargon remains unexplored. This paper introduces a domain-specific Cant dataset and CantCounter evaluation framework, employing Fine-Tuning, Co-Tuning, Data-Diffusion, and Data-Analysis stages. Experiments reveal LLMs, including ChatGPT, are susceptible to cant bypassing filters, with varying recognition accuracy influenced by question types, setups, and prompt clues. Updated models exhibit higher acceptance rates for cant queries. Moreover, LLM reactions differ across domains, e.g., reluctance to engage in racism versus LGBT topics. These findings underscore LLMs' understanding of cant and reflect training data characteristics and vendor approaches to sensitive topics. Additionally, we assess LLMs' ability to demonstrate reasoning capabilities. Access to our datasets and code is available at https://github.com/cistineup/CantCounter.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

Ethical Considerations and Policy Implications for Large Language Models: Guiding Responsible Development and Deployment

This paper examines the ethical considerations and implications of large language models (LLMs) in generating content. It highlights the potential for both positive and negative uses of generative AI programs and explores the challenges in assigning responsibility for their outputs. The discussion emphasizes the need for proactive ethical frameworks and policy measures to guide the responsible development and deployment of LLMs.

cs.CY↗