SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Zhechen Li

Publications and source records attributed to Zhechen Li.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Probabilistic Mechanism Design in Diffusion Auctions

A diffusion auction refers to a selling process conducted over a social network, where each participant submits a bid and may invite other potential buyers to join the auction. Although various mechanisms have been proposed, none of them can simultaneously achieve incentive compatibility, non-negative revenue, and approximate efficiency with a constant approximation bound. In this paper, we propose the Probabilistic Diffusion Mechanism (PDM), a novel mechanism tailored for path graphs, which satisfies all three desired properties. We further extend PDM to general network structures through a map $f$, resulting in the $f$-PDM mechanism, which preserves the key properties of the original design. Beyond these, when $f$ satisfies properties such as breadth-first order, $f$-PDM also ensures Sybil-proofness and provides approximate revenue. Furthermore, to address buyer collusion, we introduce a modified version of the mechanism that balances collusion-proofness with revenue approximation. Finally, we extend the design to multi-unit diffusion auctions -- a more challenging setting -- and propose a simple yet effective mechanism, Multi-Unit PDM (MUPDM), that achieves approximate efficiency while maintaining IC. Moreover, we design Sybil-Proof MUPDM (SP-MUPDM) to resist Sybil attacks in the multi-item scenario.

cs.GT

Differentially Private Approval-Based Committee Voting

In this paper, we investigate tradeoffs among differential privacy (DP) and several representative axioms for approval-based committee voting, including justified representation, proportional justified representation, extended justified representation, Pareto efficiency, and Condorcet criterion. Without surprise, we demonstrate that all of these axioms are incompatible with DP, and thus establish both upper and lower bounds for their two-way tradeoffs with DP. Furthermore, we provide upper and lower bounds for three-way tradeoffs among DP and every pairwise combination of such axioms, revealing that although these axioms are compatible without DP, their optimal levels under DP cannot be simultaneously achieved. Our results quantify the effect of DP on the satisfaction and compatibility of the axioms in approval-based committee voting, which can provide insights for designing voting rules that possess both privacy and axiomatic properties.

cs.GT

Trading Off Voting Axioms for Privacy

In this paper, we investigate tradeoffs among differential privacy (DP) and several important voting axioms: Pareto efficiency, SD-efficiency, PC-efficiency, Condorcet consistency, and Condorcet loser criterion. We provide upper and lower bounds on the two-way tradeoffs between DP and each axiom. We also provide upper and lower bounds on three-way tradeoffs among DP and every pairwise combination of all the axioms, showing that, while the axioms are compatible without DP, their upper bounds cannot be achieved simultaneously under DP. Our results illustrate the effect of DP on the satisfaction and compatibility of voting axioms.

cs.GT

Differentially Private Condorcet Voting

Designing private voting rules is an important and pressing problem for trustworthy democracy. In this paper, under the framework of differential privacy, we propose a novel famliy of randomized voting rules based on the well-known Condorcet method, and focus on three classes of voting rules in this family: Laplacian Condorcet method ($\CMLAP_\lambda$), exponential Condorcet method ($\CMEXP_\lambda$), and randomized response Condorcet method ($\CMRR_\lambda$), where $\lambda$ represents the level of noise. We prove that all of our rules satisfy absolute monotonicity, lexi-participation, probabilistic Pareto efficiency, approximate probabilistic Condorcet criterion, and approximate SD-strategyproofness. In addition, $\CMRR_\lambda$ satisfies (non-approximate) probabilistic Condorcet criterion, while $\CMLAP_\lambda$ and $\CMEXP_\lambda$ satisfy strong lexi-participation. Finally, we regard differential privacy as a voting axiom, and discuss its relations to other axioms.

cs.GT