Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Zhengyu Wang

Publications and source records attributed to Zhengyu Wang.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

An Improved Randomized Data Structure for Dynamic Graph Connectivity

We present a randomized algorithm for dynamic graph connectivity. With failure probability less than $1/n^c$ (for any constant $c$ we choose), our solution has worst case running time $O(\log^3 n)$ per edge insertion, $O(\log^4 n)$ per edge deletion, and $O(\log n/\log\log n)$ per query, where $n$ is the number of vertices. The previous best algorithm has worst case running time $O(\log^4 n)$ per edge insertion and $O(\log^5 n)$ per edge deletion. The improvement is made by reducing the randomness used in the previous result, so that we save a $\log n$ factor in update time. Specifically, \cite{kapron2013dynamic} uses $\log n$ copies of a data structure in order to boost a success probability from $1/2$ to $1-n^{-c}$. We show that, in fact though, because of the special structure of their algorithm, this boosting via repetition is unnecessary. Rather, we can still obtain the same correctness guarantee with high probability by arguing via a new invariant, without repetition.

cs.DS↗

Characterizing Propositional Proofs as Non-Commutative Formulas

Does every Boolean tautology have a short propositional-calculus proof? Here, a propositional calculus (i.e. Frege) proof is a proof starting from a set of axioms and deriving new Boolean formulas using a set of fixed sound derivation rules. Establishing any super-polynomial size lower bound on Frege proofs (in terms of the size of the formula proved) is a major open problem in proof complexity, and among a handful of fundamental hardness questions in complexity theory by and large. Non-commutative arithmetic formulas, on the other hand, constitute a quite weak computational model, for which exponential-size lower bounds were shown already back in 1991 by Nisan [Nis91] who used a particularly transparent argument. In this work we show that Frege lower bounds in fact follow from corresponding size lower bounds on non-commutative formulas computing certain polynomials (and that such lower bounds on non-commutative formulas must exist, unless NP=coNP). More precisely, we demonstrate a natural association between tautologies $T$ to non-commutative polynomials $p$, such that: if $T$ has a polynomial-size Frege proof then $p$ has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula; and conversely, when $T$ is a DNF, if $p$ has a polynomial-size non-commutative arithmetic formula over $GF(2)$ then $T$ has a Frege proof of quasi-polynomial size.

cs.CC↗