Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Zhi-Chao Zhao

Publications and source records attributed to Zhi-Chao Zhao.

40 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Searching for a cosmological preferred direction with 147 rotationally supported galaxies

It is well known that the Milgrom's MOND (modified Newtonian dynamics) explains well the mass discrepancy problem in galaxy rotation curves. The MOND predicts a universal acceleration scale below which the Newtonian dynamics is invalid yet. The universal acceleration scale we got from the SPARC dataset is $g_†=1.02\times10^{-10} \rm m~s^{-2}$. Milgrom suggested that the acceleration scale may be a fingerprint of cosmology on local dynamics and related with the Hubble constant $g_†\sim cH_0$. In this paper, we use the hemisphere comparison method with the SPARC dataset to investigate the spatial anisotropy on the acceleration scale. We find that the hemisphere of the maximum acceleration scale is in the direction $(l,b) = ({175.5^\circ}^{+6^\circ}_{-10^\circ}, {-6.5^\circ}^{+8^\circ}_{-3^\circ})$ with $g_{†,max}=1.10\times10^{-10} \rm m~s^{-2}$, while the hemisphere of the minimum acceleration scale is in the opposite direction $(l,b) = ({355.5^\circ}^{+6^\circ}_{-10^\circ}, {6.5^\circ}^{+3^\circ}_{-8^\circ})$ with $g_{†,min}=0.76\times10^{-10} \rm m~s^{-2}$. The maximum anisotropy level reaches up to $0.37\pm0.04$. Robust tests present that such a level of anisotropy can't be reproduced by a statistically isotropic data. In addition, we show that the spatial anisotropy on the acceleration scale has little correlation with the non-uniform distribution of the SPARC data points in sky. We also find that the maximum anisotropy direction is close with other cosmological preferred directions, especially the direction of the "Australia dipole" for the fine structure constant.

astro-ph.CO↗

Motion of photons in a background of gravitational wave

The photon motion in a Michelson interferometer is re-analyzed in both geometrical optics and wave optics. The classical paths of the photons in the background of gravitational wave are derived from Fermat principle, which is the same as the null geodesics in general relativity. The deformed Maxwell equations and the wave equations of electric fields in the background of gravitational wave are presented in flat-space approximation. Both methods show that the response of an interferometer depends on the frequency of a gravitational wave, however it is almost independent of the frequency of the mirror's vibrations. It implies that the vibrating mirror cannot mimic a gravitational wave very well.

gr-qc↗

Is GW151226 a really signal of gravitational wave?

Recently, the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration published the second observation on gravitational wave GW151226 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241103 (2016)] from the binary black hole coalescence with initial masses about 14 M$_\odot$ and 8 M$_\odot$. They claimed that the peak gravitational strain was reached at about 450 Hz, the inverse of which has been longer than the average time a photon staying in the Fabry-Perot cavities in two arms. In this case, the phase-difference of a photon in the two arms due to the propagation of gravitational wave does not always increase as the photon stays in the cavities. It might even be cancelled to zero in extreme cases. When the propagation effect is taken into account, we find that the claimed signal GW151226 would almost disappear.

gr-qc↗

Propagation effect of gravitational wave on detector response

The response of a detector to gravitational wave is a function of frequency. When the time a photon moving around in the Fabry-Perot cavities is the same order of the period of a gravitational wave, the phase-difference due to the gravitational wave should be an integral along the path. We present a formula description for detector response to gravitational wave with varied frequencies. The LIGO data for GW150914 and GW 151226 are reexamined in this framework. For GW150924, the traveling time of a photon in the LIGO detector is just a bit larger than a half period of the highest frequency of gravitational wave and the similar result is obtained with LIGO and Virgo collaborations. However, we are not always so luck. In the case of GW151226, the time of a photon traveling in the detector is larger than the period of the highest frequency of gravitational wave and the announced signal cannot match well the template with the initial black hole masses 14.2M$_\odot$ and 7.5M$_\odot$.

gr-qc↗