Zhiyun Xiao | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

An Unbounded Archive-based Transfer Strategy for Dynamic Multi-Objective Optimization with a Changing Number of Objectives

Dynamic multi-objective optimization with a variable number of objectives is difficult because objective-dimensional variations may significantly change the Pareto front and degrade algorithm adaptability. This paper proposes an unbounded archive-based transfer strategy (UATS), which maintains an unbounded archive of offspring solutions within each environment stage and extracts feasible nondominated solutions as transferable elites when objective changes occur. UATS is embedded into SPEA2SDE to construct UATS-SPEA2SDE, enabling the algorithm to reuse historical evolutionary information while retaining the convergence and diversity advantages of shift-based density estimation. Experiments are conducted on four benchmark problems under three objective-changing settings, where UATS-SPEA2SDE is compared with a restart-based SPEA2SDE baseline and four representative dynamic multi-objective optimization algorithms. The results indicate that the archive-guided transfer improves recovery after environmental changes and enhances adaptability to objective-number variations.

cs.NE↗

arXiv2026

A Scalable Benchmark Test Suite for Dynamic Multi-Objective Optimization with a Changing Number of Objectives

Dynamic multi-objective optimization with a changing number of objectives has recently attracted increasing attention due to its relevance to real-world problems whose evaluation criteria may evolve over time. However, existing benchmark test suites for this problem setting suffer from a fundamental limitation: when the number of objectives changes, the objective functions themselves also change implicitly. This makes it difficult to isolate and evaluate an algorithm's capability to handle dynamics in the number of objectives alone. In this paper, we analyze this issue in detail and show that several theoretical properties claimed in prior studies rely on an assumption that is violated by commonly used test suites. To address this problem, we propose a scalable benchmark test suite in which the objective functions are fixed throughout the optimization process, while the number of active objectives changes over time. Our benchmark is constructed by defining a maximum-objective problem and dynamically selecting subsets of objectives. To avoid degeneracy issues in classical DTLZ and WFG problems, we adopt Minus-DTLZ and Minus-WFG formulations, in which all objectives are mutually conflicting. Extensive benchmark studies using representative algorithms from the literature demonstrate the usefulness and flexibility of the proposed test suite.

cs.NE↗